The Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld) (QCAT Act) established the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT). QCAT has subsumed the jurisdiction of nineteen (19) former tribunals and aims to provide the public with an expedient mechanism for resolving disputes at the minimum expense.
QCAT’s jurisdiction
QCAT hears various matters including, but not limited to, building disputes, anti-discrimination matters, dividing fence disputes, residential tenancy disputes, occupational regulation matters and minor civil disputes.
Minor civil disputes are those that exist either between individuals or an individual and a trader or business and valued up to and including $A25,000. Minor civil disputes can include claims for property damage, consumer complaints and residential tenancy disputes.
Enforcing orders of QCAT
Sections 131 and 132 of the QCAT Act set out the procedure involved in order to enforce:
- a monetary decision; and
- a non-monetary decision.
Both sections require an individual who seeks to enforce a QCAT decision to file a copy of the decision and an affidavit in relation to non-compliance in a court of competent jurisdiction.
Proposed amendments
The Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2014 (Qld) (Bill) once passed will help reconcile ambiguities in QCAT Act and assist in the efficient allocation of resources and resolution of disputes. The amendments will also provide immunity to QCAT conciliators and costs assessors as other QCAT members.
Clause 109 of the Bill proposes to amend sections 131 and 132 of the QCAT Act. If passed, the amendments will remove the requirement that that a copy of the decision and an affidavit of non-compliance be filed in the relevant court.
The amendments will mean, in effect, that a decision of QCAT represents an enforceable court order under Chapter 19 and 20 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld).
The benefit of removing this administrative requirement is highlighted in the Explanatory Notes for the Bill. The Explanatory Note states the amendment of the QCAT Act is to “reduce red tape by streamlining the process for enforcing a final decision of the tribunal in a court”.
Links and further references
Legislation
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld)
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld)
Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2014 (Qld)
Further information
If you need advice on enforcing QCAT decisions, please contact us for an obligation free and confidential discussion.
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstance.
Related insights about enforcing QCAT decisions
-
Point in time valuation and minority shareholder oppression
Shareholder oppression, or minority shareholder oppression, is generally thought to occur when the majority shareholders misuse their power to oppress or control the minority.
-
Tortious interference with contract – injunctive relief
The wrongful or “tortious” interference with a contract occurs when a third party intentionally causes a contracting party to commit a breach of contract. The third party will be liable if they intentionally induced or disrupted a party’s ability to perform the terms of a binding contract. Remedies for tortious interference are available to ensure…
-
Software developer obtains Court order – names behind IP addresses
Justice Burley of the Federal Court of Australia in the case of Siemens Industry Software Inc v Telstra Corporation Limited [2020] FCA 901 ordered that Telstra, within fourteen (14) days, provide to Siemens all documents in its control relating to the identity of certain Telstra Account holders. Those account holders were suspected by Siemens of…
-
Skincare brand Biologi breached the ACL – ordered to publish 5 corrective notices
In a recent decision of the Federal Court in Native Extracts Pty Ltd v Plant Extracts Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 1265 Downes J issued an initial judgement and made orders for declaratory relief and the publication of eight (8) corrective notices by Plant Extracts Pty Ltd ACN 613 551 349 (Plant Extracts) and skincare brand…
-
Is a proposed settlement fair and reasonable – Federal Court
Class action lawsuits commonly resolve in a settlement between the members of a class and the respondents to a claim. However, there are strict requirements to proposed settlements, including that they are ‘fair and reasonable’, which will be subject to judicial oversight.
-
Is a proposed settlement fair and reasonable – what will the Federal Court consider?
Parties seeking to settle a class action must apply to the Federal Court for approval. Judges will assess the fairness of the settlement by examining factors such as the best possible recovery, risks of litigation, class reaction, and independent advice.
-
Legal costs – discontinuing by consent in the Federal Court
Businesses must take care when making forecasts, as potential legal consequences may arise if records of the basis for them are not kept.
-
What is standard discovery in the Federal Court?
This article provides an in-depth look into the requirements of standard discovery in the Federal Court of Australia. Learn more about the relevance of documents, what constitutes ‘readily accessible’ documents, and relevant case law for narrowing the scope of discovery for a just resolution of disputes.
-
Inspection of documents in the Federal Court
Document inspection in civil litigation before the Federal Court of Australia: rights of parties, rights of non-parties, court rules, and the two exceptions to presumption of access for non-parties.
