PATENTS – application for an interlocutory injunction by patent holder – where generic recently launched – where patent holder is claiming for infringement – where patent alleged to be invalid – whether balance of convenience favours the grant of an injunction – where there has been substantial delay on the part of the patent holder – where detriment to the patent holder if the injunction is not granted is much more readily quantifiable in damages than the detriment to the generic – application dismissed
Related cases
-
Sanofi v Amgen Inc. [2023] FCA 264
PATENTS – whether order for discovery of documents should be made in appeal pursuant to s 60(4) of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) – whether appellant should be granted leave to rely on experimental proof pursuant to r 34.50(2)(b) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) in said appeal Held: discovery refused – leave under r 34.50(2)(b) granted…
-
The Noco Company v Hong Kong Haowei Technology Co., Ltd. [2023] FCA 533
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – service out of the jurisdiction – substituted service – where the respondents are registered in Hong Kong and China – where the applicant claims that the respondents are infringing its Australian patents by conduct in Australia and seeks injunctive relief – where the applicant contends that it is not practicable to…
-
Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Globaltech Corporation Pty Ltd (No 4) [2023] FCA 517
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE —– application for freezing orders against respondents to a proceeding for patent infringement and a third party —– third party holds security interests over intellectual property assets of first respondent and member of same group of companies as respondents —– liability previously determined in favour of applicant against respondents —– hearing on…
