PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application to set aside order under r 39.05(f) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 – Where order entered in favour of the applicant – Where the applicant is no longer trading – Where the trademark is no longer registered – Where no benefit derived from the order – Where all parties consent to the orders proposed – Order set aside.
Related trade mark cases
-
Killer Queen, LLC v Taylor [2024] FCAFC 149
TRADE MARKS – infringement of registered trade mark established – where registered trade mark is a name – joint tortfeasance – principles discussed TRADE MARKS – specification of registered goods – meaning of “clothes” – role of the Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of…
-
Hugo Boss AG v Hardge [2024] FCA 1325
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for default judgment pursuant to r 5.23(2)(c) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where substituted service orders made – where respondent in default of appearance – allegations of trade mark infringement, misleading and deceptive conduct and passing off – whether the applicant is entitled to relief – relief…
-
The Practice Pty Ltd v The Practice Business Advisers & Tax Practitioners Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1299
TRADE MARKS – infringement claim pursuant to s 120 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (the Act) – whether the respondent used the plain word mark THE PRACTICE as a trade mark – whether the respondent’s marks are substantially identical with, or deceptively similar to, the applicant’s mark – defence under s 122(1)(b)(i)…
Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2024/2024fca0607
For more information, see the original judgement.
