Lawyers for litigation

ETO Group PL v ETO Gruppe Technologies GmbH [2025] FCA 1253

ETO Group PL v ETO Gruppe Technologies GmbH [2025] FCA 1253

TRADE MARKS – appeal from decision of delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks in an application for removal of the trade mark the subject of this appeal from the Register of Trade Marks pursuant to subs 92(4)(a) and (b) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – non-use – where respondent filed a submitting notice – where Registrar did not seek to intervene – satisfied no self evident reason not to reverse delegate’s decision – appeal allowed


Recent cases about trademark revocation

  • ETO Group PL v ETO Gruppe Technologies GmbH [2025] FCA 1253

    TRADE MARKS – appeal from decision of delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks in an application for removal of the trade mark the subject of this appeal from the Register of Trade Marks pursuant to subs 92(4)(a) and (b) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – non-use – where respondent filed a submitting notice…

  • Progressive Green Pty Ltd v Flo Energy Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 1315

    TRADE MARKS – application for removal from Register due to lack of good faith use under s 92(4)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – whether use as a trade mark over the relevant four-day period – whether use in relation to relevant class of goods – whether use in good faith – where…

  • Koninklijke Douwe Egberts BV v Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1277

    TRADE MARKS — shape marks – where the first applicant is the registered owner of a trade mark constituted by the shape of a cylindrical container with a stopper in Class 30 over coffee and instant coffee (the KDE shape mark) – where the respondent (Cantarella) released a 400-gram instant coffee product under its brand…

Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2025/2025fca1253For more information, see the original judgement.

Send this to a friend