TRADE MARKS — s 62(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – where an Examiner considered that a trade mark under examination was not inherently adapted to distinguish in respect of a certain class, and sought evidence or representations as to the trade mark applicant’s prior use of the mark – where the representations as to prior use by the trade mark applicant were false – where the primary judge held that the trade mark in question was inherently adapted to distinguish, and so evidence of prior use was irrelevant to the registrability of the mark – whether the primary judge erred in holding that evidence or representations are not “false in material particulars” unless false in a way that affects the registrability of the trade mark – Colorado Group Ltd v Strandbags Group Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 160; 67 IPR 628 and Colorado Group Ltd v Strandbags Group Pty Ltd [2007] FCAFC 184; 164 FCR 506, considered – held: the ground of opposition in s 62(b) can be established even where the evidence or representations in ques
Related cases about trademark infringement
-
The Agency Group Australia Ltd v H.A.S. Real Estate Pty Ltd [2023] FCAFC 203
TRADE MARKS – appeal – where primary judge found that the respondent had not infringed the second appellant’s registered trade marks – whether primary judge erred in finding that the word mark THE NORTH AGENCY used by the respondent was not deceptively similar to the second appellant’s registered trade mark – no error established –…
-
Vitaco Health IP Pty Ltd v AFI Cosmetic Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 1463
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for interlocutory injunction – ex parte application – strong prima facie case of trade mark and copyright infringement, and breach of s 18 and s 29 of the Australian Consumer Law – First Respondent’s two websites use the applicants’ logos and other branded content, and falsely indicate the First Respondent…
-
Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd v Lavazza Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2023] FCA 1258
TRADE MARKS – infringement – whether the respondents have infringed the applicant’s registered trade marks comprising the word ORO TRADE MARKS – infringement – defences to infringement – whether the respondents can establish the defences under ss 122(1)(b)(i), 122(1)(e), 122(1)(f) and (fa), and 124 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) TRADE MARKS – validity…
Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/full/2024/2024fcafc0156
For more information, see the original judgement.
