Lawyers for litigation

Killer Queen, LLC v Taylor [2024] FCAFC 149

Killer Queen, LLC v Taylor [2024] FCAFC 149

TRADE MARKS – infringement of registered trade mark established – where registered trade mark is a name – joint tortfeasance – principles discussed

TRADE MARKS – specification of registered goods – meaning of “clothes” – role of the Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks as an aid to construction

TRADE MARKS – defence to infringement – where infringing mark is a name mark – own name defence – whether joint tortfeasor who does not use the infringing mark can rely on the defence – whether defence applies to the use of an adopted name – where person relying on defence has assigned the name mark – whether assignor can rely on continuing use of own name as a defence

TRADE MARKS – defence to infringement – where infringing mark is deceptively similar to the registered mark – whether person using the infringing mark would obtain registration – honest concurrent use – whether concurrent use established – whether honest use established

TRADE MARKS – cancellation – whether, because of reputation in prior mark, use of the registered mark would be likely to deceive or cause confusion – where ground of cancellation established – whether discretion should be exercised not to cancel the registration of the registered mark

TRADE MARKS – cancellation – whether, because of circumstances applying at the time when the application for rectification is filed, the use of the registered mark is likely to deceive or cause confusion – where ground of cancellation is established – whether discretion should be exercised not to cancel the registration of the registered mark


Related Federal Court cases on trade marks

  • ETO Group PL v ETO Gruppe Technologies GmbH [2025] FCA 1253

    TRADE MARKS – appeal from decision of delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks in an application for removal of the trade mark the subject of this appeal from the Register of Trade Marks pursuant to subs 92(4)(a) and (b) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – non-use – where respondent filed a submitting notice…

  • Progressive Green Pty Ltd v Flo Energy Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 1315

    TRADE MARKS – application for removal from Register due to lack of good faith use under s 92(4)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – whether use as a trade mark over the relevant four-day period – whether use in relation to relevant class of goods – whether use in good faith – where…

  • Thomas v Monsoon Group Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 911

    TRADE MARKS – non-use – where the respondent brought a non-use action before the Registrar of Trade Marks (the Registrar) pursuant to s 92(4)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (the Act) – whether to grant the applicant an extension of time to appeal decision of the Registrar’s delegate under r 34.25 of the Federal Court Rules…

Send this to a friend