TRADE MARKS – infringement of registered trade mark established – where registered trade mark is a name – joint tortfeasance – principles discussed
TRADE MARKS – specification of registered goods – meaning of “clothes” – role of the Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks as an aid to construction
TRADE MARKS – defence to infringement – where infringing mark is a name mark – own name defence – whether joint tortfeasor who does not use the infringing mark can rely on the defence – whether defence applies to the use of an adopted name – where person relying on defence has assigned the name mark – whether assignor can rely on continuing use of own name as a defence
TRADE MARKS – defence to infringement – where infringing mark is deceptively similar to the registered mark – whether person using the infringing mark would obtain registration – honest concurrent use – whether concurrent use established – whether honest use established
TRADE MARKS – cancellation – whether, because of reputation in prior mark, use of the registered mark would be likely to deceive or cause confusion – where ground of cancellation established – whether discretion should be exercised not to cancel the registration of the registered mark
TRADE MARKS – cancellation – whether, because of circumstances applying at the time when the application for rectification is filed, the use of the registered mark is likely to deceive or cause confusion – where ground of cancellation is established – whether discretion should be exercised not to cancel the registration of the registered mark
Related Federal Court cases on trade marks
-
Koninklijke Douwe Egberts BV v Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd (Costs) [2025] FCA 38
COSTS — where the applicants brought a claim of trade mark infringement against the respondent – where the respondent brought a cross-claim seeking the cancellation of the first applicant’s registered trade mark – where both the applicants’ claim and the respondent’s cross-claim failed – where the cross-claim was only ever defensive – whether the respondent…
-
Maxim Media Inc. v Nuclear Enterprises Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1443
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – application for interlocutory injunction on grounds of contravention of ss 18 and 29 of the Australian Consumer Law (Sch 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)), passing off and infringement of a registered trade mark under s 120 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – consideration of relevant factors…
-
Caporaso Pty Ltd v Mercato Centrale Australia Pty Ltd [2024] FCAFC 156
TRADE MARKS — s 62(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – where an Examiner considered that a trade mark under examination was not inherently adapted to distinguish in respect of a certain class, and sought evidence or representations as to the trade mark applicant’s prior use of the mark – where the representations…
