TRADE MARKS – infringement of registered trade mark established – where registered trade mark is a name – joint tortfeasance – principles discussed
TRADE MARKS – specification of registered goods – meaning of “clothes” – role of the Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks as an aid to construction
TRADE MARKS – defence to infringement – where infringing mark is a name mark – own name defence – whether joint tortfeasor who does not use the infringing mark can rely on the defence – whether defence applies to the use of an adopted name – where person relying on defence has assigned the name mark – whether assignor can rely on continuing use of own name as a defence
TRADE MARKS – defence to infringement – where infringing mark is deceptively similar to the registered mark – whether person using the infringing mark would obtain registration – honest concurrent use – whether concurrent use established – whether honest use established
TRADE MARKS – cancellation – whether, because of reputation in prior mark, use of the registered mark would be likely to deceive or cause confusion – where ground of cancellation established – whether discretion should be exercised not to cancel the registration of the registered mark
TRADE MARKS – cancellation – whether, because of circumstances applying at the time when the application for rectification is filed, the use of the registered mark is likely to deceive or cause confusion – where ground of cancellation is established – whether discretion should be exercised not to cancel the registration of the registered mark
Related Federal Court cases on trade marks
-
Koninklijke Douwe Egberts BV v Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1277
TRADE MARKS — shape marks – where the first applicant is the registered owner of a trade mark constituted by the shape of a cylindrical container with a stopper in Class 30 over coffee and instant coffee (the KDE shape mark) – where the respondent (Cantarella) released a 400-gram instant coffee product under its brand…
-
Global Retail Brands Australia Pty Ltd v Bed Bath ‘N’ Table Pty Ltd [2024] FCAFC 139
CONSUMER LAW – misleading or deceptive conduct – where, by its use of trade mark “HOUSE BED & BATH” (appellant’s mark) in relation to soft homewares in a market in which respondent’s trade mark “BED BATH ‘N’ TABLE” (respondent’s mark) has a significant reputation, appellant found to have contravened ss 18(1) and 29(1)(g) and (h)…
-
FanFirm Pty Limited v Fanatics, LLC (No 2) [2024] FCA 826
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for stay of orders pursuant to r 36.08 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether stay or rectification of the Trade Marks Register more suitable course pending determination of appeal – whether stay or injunction more suitable course pending determination of appeal – application partially granted.
