PRACTICE – leave sought pursuant to r 23.03(2)(a) to cross-examine Court expert – expert valued shares in a company which was the subject of oppression proceedings – proposed cross-examination to address valuation methodology – no point of principle
Related cases on Shareholder oppression
-
Our Jim & Felicja Superfund Pty Ltd as trustee for the Jim & Felicja Superannuation Fund v Lindenfels Pte Ltd [2026] FCA 307
CORPORATIONS – application for relief under s 233 of the Corporations Act 2001(Cth) (Corporations Act) for claim of oppression of minority shareholders – intersection between contractual rights and fiduciary obligations – intersection between fiduciary obligations and statutory causes of action for oppression – where agency agreement appointed a company as marketing agent for the marketing…
-
Ugle v South West Aboriginal Medical Service Limited [2026] FCA 101
CORPORATIONS – oppression – application to make orders under s 233(1) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to fix a date for an annual general meeting and to modify the company constitution to provide for election of directors – where corporation is a public company limited by guarantee – where corporation is a registered charity – where corporation…
-
First Class Securities Limited v Global Future Holdings Pty Ltd (Freezing Orders) [2026] FCA 48
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for freezing orders pursuant to r 7.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where ex parte freezing orders and asset disclosure orders have been made against the respondents – whether applicant has established good arguable case, risk of undermining the Court’s processes – whether balance of convenience favours…
