Lawyers for litigation

Mokhtari v Piacentini & Son PL [2025] FCA 26

Mokhtari v Piacentini & Son PL [2025] FCA 26

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for orders for preservation of documents – where orders made referring the issue of the extent and nature of discovery for consideration at a conference by a registrar – where applicant alleges that system updates to computing software used by the respondent may compromise the discovery process – whether likely that documents will be lost or destroyed – whether preservation orders appropriate in the circumstances – held materials in support of application do not reveal a basis for concern that critical documents will be destroyed or lost – orders as sought by the applicant would circumvent the conference to be convened before the registrar – application dismissed


Related cases – asset preservation orders

  • Bodum AG v H.A.G Import Corpn (Australia) Pty Ltd [2026] FCA 238

    INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – application for injunctive relief for breaches of ss 18, 29(1)(a), (g) and (h) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 (Australian Consumer Law) and passing off CONSUMER LAW – misleading or deceptive conduct – passing off – use of the shape and design features of the applicants’ double walled…

  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Bekier (Liability Judgment) [2026] FCA 196

    CORPORATIONS – where ASIC commenced civil penalty proceedings against eleven members of the executive team and board of Star Entertainment Group Limited (Star) in respect of alleged contraventions during dealings with junkets and the Group’s principal banker CORPORATIONS – whether directors and officers of Star contravened s 180(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) by…

  • Trafalgar Group Pty Ltd v Boss Fire & Safety Pty Ltd [2026] FCA 202

    TRADE MARKS – appeal from decision of Registrar – non-use – mark used in relevant period as part of composite marks – “mark within a mark” – appeal allowed TRADE MARKS – whether second word in each of composite marks used after trade mark were additions or alterations “substantially affecting its identity” – held that…

Send this to a friend