Lawyers for litigation

Mokhtari v Piacentini & Son PL [2025] FCA 26

Mokhtari v Piacentini & Son PL [2025] FCA 26

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for orders for preservation of documents – where orders made referring the issue of the extent and nature of discovery for consideration at a conference by a registrar – where applicant alleges that system updates to computing software used by the respondent may compromise the discovery process – whether likely that documents will be lost or destroyed – whether preservation orders appropriate in the circumstances – held materials in support of application do not reveal a basis for concern that critical documents will be destroyed or lost – orders as sought by the applicant would circumvent the conference to be convened before the registrar – application dismissed


Related cases – asset preservation orders

  • Scidera, Inc. v Meat and Livestock Australia Limited (No 2) [2025] FCA 1236

    PATENTS – method claims – method claims that do not result in a product – patent area – infringement – infringement where method claims are partially performed offshore – exploit – exclusive rights given by patent – object of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application for summary dismissal – novel…

  • Butler v Total Tools Holdings Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 1225

    CORPORATIONS – shareholders’ resolution authorising board of company to issue an equity-based instrument to non-executive directors upon successful financial close of an initial public offering or trade sale – where plaintiff resigned as non-executive director following failure to complete trade sale originally contemplated – where separate trade sale subsequently completed – where company refused to…

  • Australian Information Commissioner v Australian Clinical Labs Limited (No 2) [2025] FCA 1224

    PRIVACY ACT – Where an APP entity breached Australian Privacy Principle (APP) 11.1 of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) (Act) by failing to take reasonable steps to protect personal information from unauthorised access or disclosure – what constitutes “reasonable steps” – where an APP entity interfered with the privacy of 223,000 individuals under s 13(1)…

Send this to a friend