Lawyers for litigation

Novartis AG v Pharmacor Pty Limited (No 3) [2024] FCA 1307

Novartis AG v Pharmacor Pty Limited (No 3) [2024] FCA 1307

PATENTS – infringement – standard patent for a pharmaceutical composition containing certain active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) – claim construction – whether claim covers a pharmaceutical composition where the API is in the form of a complex in which the ions are associated by non-covalent bonds

PATENTS – identity of the person skilled in the art – where the person skilled in the art is understood as a “team” – discussion of the characteristics of the person skilled in the art

PATENTS – validity – lack of inventive step – availability of prior art information – whether person skilled in the art could be reasonably expected to have ascertained and regarded as relevant certain prior art publications

PATENTS – validity – lack of inventive step – discussion of the reformulated “Cripps question” – whether obviousness established on the evidence

PATENTS – extension of patent term – whether extension validly granted – whether rectification of the Register of Patents should be ordered

Related cases

  • Nutrafruit Pty Ltd v Fivefifty5 Super Foods Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1218

    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – leave to withdraw an admission – where first to third respondents admitted that there have been at least 15,000 Queen Garnet trees on relevant property – where precise number of trees remains an issue in the proceedings – where no prejudice to the applicant

  • Dei Gratia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2024] FCA 1145

    PATENTS – a logistics facility and related systems and methods for the provision of goods or services to an end user – network of modified local outlets – manner of manufacture – s 18(a) of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) – computer-implemented scheme – patentability of a computer-implemented scheme – use of computers for their…

  • Glass Hardware Australia Pty Ltd v TCT Group Pty Ltd [2024] FCAFC 95

    PATENTS – innovation patent relating to hinges – infringement – validity – whether primary judge erred in the proper construction of the invention disclosed PATENTS – validity – lack of clear and complete description – classical sufficiency – “relevant range” – s 40(2)(a) of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) – whether primary judge erred in…

Send this to a friend