Lawyers for litigation

Progressive Green Pty Ltd v Flo Energy Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 1315

Progressive Green Pty Ltd v Flo Energy Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 1315

TRADE MARKS – application for removal from Register due to lack of good faith use under s 92(4)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – whether use as a trade mark over the relevant four-day period – whether use in relation to relevant class of goods – whether use in good faith – where trade mark purchased for the purpose of litigation – whether use authorised – where trade mark purchased by third party and assigned to relevant user – where licence agreement stipulated the form of the use of the trade mark

TRADE MARKS – application for cancellation under s 88(1)(a) of the Act under the ground in s 88(2)(c) – whether use of trade mark with earlier priority date is likely to deceive or cause confusion

TRADE MARKS – application for cancellation under s 88(1)(a) of the Act under the ground in ss 88(2)(a) and 41 – whether trade marks inherently adapted to distinguish goods and services – whether rival traders with no improper motive would wish to use words for their ordinary signification – relevance of words closely resembling the trade marks – where trade marks inherently adapted to distinguish goods to some extent – factual distinctiveness – where evidence of use and intended use does not establish that trade marks were inherently adapted to distinguish at the priority date – where ground for rectification established – whether to exercise discretion not to cancel trade mark registration

TRADE MARKS – application for cancellation under s 88(1)(a) of the Act under the ground in ss 88(2)(a) and 44 – where trade marks are deceptively similar – whether, in the circumstances, it would be proper to accept the application under s 44(3)(b) – where ground for rectification established – whether to exercise discretion not to cancel trade mark registration

TRADE MARKS – infringement – deceptive similarity

TRADE MARKS – infringement – defences under ss 122(1)(e) and 122(1)(fa)


Recent cases about trademark infringement

  • Thomas v Monsoon Group Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 911

    TRADE MARKS – non-use – where the respondent brought a non-use action before the Registrar of Trade Marks (the Registrar) pursuant to s 92(4)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (the Act) – whether to grant the applicant an extension of time to appeal decision of the Registrar’s delegate under r 34.25 of the Federal Court Rules…

  • McCallum v Projector Films Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 903

    McCallum v Projector Films Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 903

  • Paige LLC v Sage and Paige Collective Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 750

    TRADE MARKS – whether composite marks containing the registered mark and other words (Opposed Marks) deceptively similar under s 44 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – whether the appellant’s trade mark acquired a reputation in Australia before the Priority Date and because of that reputation would likely deceive or cause confusion under s…

Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2025/2025fca1315For more information, see the original judgement.
Send this to a friend