At Dundas Lawyers®, we understand that Cyber Security is becoming an increasing threat to businesses alongside complex regulatory and compliance issues. We specialise in offering a broad range of knowledge and expertise to allow businesses to focus on their core craft whilst meeting the relevant security and compliance requirements. With our unique multidisciplinary approach, we advise clients on how to detect vulnerabilities and identify gaps in their businesses IT ecosystem.
Why choose Dundas Lawyers®?
Having exerted Blood Sweat and Years® since April 2010 we are the team you want on your side for the long term to act as the ‘bodyguard’ for your business in cyber security consultancy. Some of the reasons clients choose Dundas Lawyers® include:
- our Uncommon business acumen;
- our Uncommon expertise in transactional, compliance and litigious matters;
- our Uncommon expertise in forensic case preparation;
- our Uncommon customer focus;
- the fact that we don’t just know law, we know business!;
- how we leverage our Uncommon Nous® to provide client-centric solutions.
Considering getting a lawyer to advise your business?
For a confidential, no-obligation initial telephone call to find out how we can help your business gain an uncommon advantage in cyber security consultancy, please phone our team on either 1300 386 529 or 07 3221 0013.

Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au

Legislation
- Security of Critical Infrastructure (SOCI) Act 2018 (Cth)
- Security of Critical Infrastructure Rules 2018 (Cth)
- Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Act 2021 (Cth)
- Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth)
- Criminal Code Regulations 2019 (Cth)
- Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
- Competition and Consumer Regulations 2010 (Cth)
- Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)
- Privacy Regulations 2006 (Cth)
Recent insights for cyber security consultants
Recent Federal Court decisions regarding cyber security consultants
-
Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Robertson [2024] FCAFC 58
PRIVILEGE – legal professional privilege – third party report – investigation into cyber-attack – whether the report was created for the dominant purpose of legal advice – multiple purposes for commissioning report – unchallenged evidence – adverse inference – failure to adduce specific and focused evidence – time for assessing dominant purpose PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE…
-
Khan v Google LLC [2023] FCA 785
Leave to proceed granted in Federal Court of Australia on application served outside Australia. Court orders preliminary discovery on more confined terms than those initially sought.