With a background managing software development projects and scientific and technology companies prior to being called to the law, our Principal is uniquely qualified to advise on aspects of scientific and technical matters.
Why choose Dundas Lawyers®?
Having exerted Blood Sweat and Years® since April 2010 we are the team you want on your side for the long term to act as the ‘bodyguard’ for your business in the scientific and technical industry. Some of the reasons clients choose Dundas Lawyers® include:
- our Uncommon business acumen;
- our Uncommon expertise in transactional, compliance and litigious matters;
- our Uncommon expertise forensic case preparation;
- our Uncommon customer focus;
- the fact that we don’t just know law, we know business!
- how we leverage our Uncommon Nous® to provide client centric solutions.
Considering getting a lawyer to advise your business?
For a confidential, no obligation initial telephone call to find out how we can help your business gain an uncommon advantage in the scientific and technical industry, please phone our team on either 1300 386 529 or 07 3221 0013.
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Recent insights for scientific and technical companies
-
Use of a competitors trade marks for comparative advertising
Comparative advertising can be a powerful tool, but it must be done within the bounds of the law. Learn more about the legal implications of comparative advertising in Australia, including the case of GlaxoSmithKline Australia Pty Ltd v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 1. Read more
Recent Federal Court decisions regarding scientific and technical companies
-
RB (Hygiene Home) Australia Pty Ltd v Henkel Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2024] FCAFC 92
COSTS – application for variation to costs orders – appropriate order as to costs – where appellants failed to establish trade mark infringement at trial and on appeal but successful in resisting validity challenge – where respondent’s validity arguments raised only in response to infringement case – where appellants successful in demonstrating appealable error –…
-
McLean-Phillips v Carnival plc t/as P&O Cruises Australia (No 3) [2023] FCA 985
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for summary judgment, or alternatively to strike out the further amended statement of claim – whether the statement of claim now pleads the deficiencies in the services provided and a causal link between those deficiencies and the claimed loss – whether there is a reasonable prospect of establishing a breach…
-
Medibank Private Limited v Australian Information Commissioner [2024] FCA 117
PRIVACY – investigation by Australian Information Commissioner – breach of Australian Privacy Principles – own initiative investigation under s 40(2) of Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) – representative complaint under ss 36 and 38 of the Act – injunction to restrain investigation under representative complaint – separate Federal Court representative proceeding dealing with overlapping issues –…
