artificial intelligence law

New OAIC guidance on Artificial Intelligence

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–5 minutes

On 21 October 2024, the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) published two (2) new guides on artificial intelligence (AI), purportedly in effort to make privacy compliance easier for business.[1]

What does the OAIC AI guidance provide?

The first guide is claimed to ‘make it easier for businesses to comply with their privacy obligations when using commercially available AI products and help them select an appropriate product‘.

The second guide claims to provide ‘guidance to developers using personal information to train generative AI models‘.  Both guides include checklists for readers, and together they aim to provide comprehensive coverage of the entire AI process, from development in the second guide to deployment in the first guide.[2]

2024-11-04-ai-development-to-deployment

Image Source: Department of Industry, Science and Resources, Safe and responsible AI in Australia: Proposals paper for introducing mandatory guardrails for AI in high-risk settings, September 2024.

Guidance on privacy and the use of commercially available AI products

The first guide claims to set itself apart from the main regulatory legislation for privacy, that being the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), by instead of targeting all uses of AI which involve the handling of personal information as the Privacy Act does, the guide focuses particularly on the use of generative AI tools and general-purpose AI tools.

The key points from the first guide state:

  • “Privacy obligations will apply to any personal information input into an AI system, as well as the output data generated by AI (where it contains personal information);
  • businesses should update their privacy policies and notifications with clear and transparent information about their use of AI;
  • if AI systems are used to generate or infer personal information, including images, this is a collection of personal information and must comply with APP 3;
  • if personal information is being input into an AI system, APP 6 requires entities to only use or disclose the information for the primary purpose for which it was collected; and
  • as a matter of best practice, the OAIC recommends that organisations do not enter personal information, and particularly sensitive information, into publicly available generative AI tools.”

The checklists provided by the first guide include a:

Guidance on privacy and developing and training generative AI models

The second guide aims to assist in compliance with the Privacy Act, along with assisting Australian Privacy Principle (APP) entities in complying with specifically with APPs 1, 3, 5, 6 and 10.

The key points of the second guide state that:

  • “Developers must take reasonable steps to ensure accuracy in generative AI models;
  • just because data is publicly available or otherwise accessible does not mean it can legally be used to train or fine-tune generative AI models or systems;
  • developers must take particular care with sensitive information, which generally requires consent to be collected;
  • where developers are seeking to use personal information that they already hold for the purpose of training an AI model, and this was not a primary purpose of collection, they need to carefully consider their privacy obligations; and
  • where a developer cannot clearly establish that a secondary use for an AI-related purpose was within reasonable expectations and related to a primary purpose, to avoid regulatory risk they should seek consent for that use and/or offer individuals a meaningful and informed ability to opt-out of such a use.”

The second guide provides a checklist for privacy considerations when training AI models.[4]

Conclusion

In conclusion, the new guidance from the OAIC can be used as a resource to assist businesses and developers navigating privacy compliance in artificial intelligence.  By providing practical checklists for selecting AI products and training generative AI models, these guides can help organisations meet their obligations under the Privacy Act.  Emphasising responsible use and transparency, the OAIC’s recommendations aim to foster trust and accountability as AI technology continues to evolve.

Links and further references

Legislation

Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)

Further information about artificial intelligence

If you need advice on the existing guidance about artificial intelligence, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free and discussion:

[1] OAIC (21 Oct 2024) New AI guidance makes privacy compliance easier for business, https://www.oaic.gov.au/news/media-centre/new-ai-guidance-makes-privacy-compliance-easier-for-business.
[2] Ibid.
[3] OAIC (21 Oct 2024) Guidance on privacy and the use of commercially available ai products, https://www.oaic.gov.au/privacy/privacy-guidance-for-organisations-and-government-agencies/guidance-on-privacy-and-the-use-of-commercially-available-ai-products.

[4] OAIC (21 Oct 2024) Guidance on privacy and developing and training generative ai models, https://www.oaic.gov.au/privacy/privacy-guidance-for-organisations-and-government-agencies/guidance-on-privacy-and-developing-and-training-generative-ai-models.


Related insights about artificial intelligence

  • Office of AI announced by Federal Government

    Office of AI announced by Federal Government

    On 15 July 2026, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese (Prime Minister) announced by media release an expansion of the Federal Government’s (Government) existing artificial intelligence (AI) governance framework, including the establishment of a new Office of AI as well as plans to legislate national standards governing large-scale data centres, AI training and the use of Australian…

    Read more …

  • Federal Court publishes GenAI Practice Note

    Federal Court publishes GenAI Practice Note

    On 16 April 2026, the Federal Court of Australia (Court) published the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Practice Note (GPN-AI) (Cth) (GenAI Practice Note). 

    Read more …

  • AI businesses should have duty of care

    AI businesses should have duty of care

    In a recent interview with InnovationAus.com, Victorian Senator Michelle Ananda-Rajah (Senator) emphasised the need to adopt digital duty of care laws for artificial intelligence (AI) companies.[1]  As a representative of the ALP and former AI start-up founder, the Senator calls for the proposed digital duty of care to apply to AI companies.  If implemented, the…

    Read more …

  • Bill to allow victims of AI deepfakes to sue for emotional damages

    Bill to allow victims of AI deepfakes to sue for emotional damages

    On 24 November 2025, Senator David Pocock introduced a private Senator’s bill, the Online Safety and Other Legislation Amendment (My Face, My Rights) Bill 2025 (Cth) (Bill) to amend the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) (Online Safety Act) and the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) (Privacy Act). 

    Read more …

  • Malcolm Burrows on ABC’s “Legal Eagles” segment – Deepfakes

    Malcolm Burrows on ABC’s “Legal Eagles” segment – Deepfakes

    On 3 December 2025, Malcolm Burrows appeared live on Katherine Feeney’s ABC Radio program, “Legal Eagles” as the Technology and Intellectual Property Lawyer to discuss the proposed amendments to the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) through the introduction of the Online Safety and other legislation Amendment (My Face Rights) Bill (Cth) 2025 (My Face Rights…

    Read more …

  • Federal Gov rules out copyright text and data mining exception for AI

    Federal Gov rules out copyright text and data mining exception for AI

    On 26 October 2025, the Attorney-General, Hon Michelle Rowland MP, published a media release reiterating that the current Federal Government will not introduce a text and data mining (TDM) exception to copyright infringement in the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Copyright Act).  The Attorney-General’s Department will instead engage in further consultations with members of the Copyright…

    Read more …

  • Malcolm Burrows on ABC’s “Legal Eagles” segment – Can artificial intelligence give you justice?

    Malcolm Burrows on ABC’s “Legal Eagles” segment – Can artificial intelligence give you justice?

    On 22 October 2025, Malcolm Burrows appeared live on Katherine Feeney’s ABC Radio program, “Legal Eagles” as the Technology and Intellectual Property Lawyer to discuss legal issues associated with artificial intelligence and the justice system.

    Read more …

  • Malcolm Burrows on ABC’s “Legal Eagles” segment – copyright law and the Anthropic case

    Malcolm Burrows on ABC’s “Legal Eagles” segment – copyright law and the Anthropic case

    On 10 September 2025, Malcolm Burrows appeared live on Katherine Feeney’s ABC Radio program, “Legal Eagles” as the Technology and Intellectual Property Lawyer to discuss legal issues associated with copyright subsisting in artificial intelligence (AI) training data.

    Read more …

  • Claude AI agrees to pay US $1.5B to settle copyright class action

    Claude AI agrees to pay US $1.5B to settle copyright class action

    Several authors commenced class action lawsuit against Claude AI (Anthropic) in the San Francisco District Court.  The authors allege Anthropic infringed their copyright by using millions of pirated and purchased books to train its artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot, Claude AI.  Anthropic has agreed to settle the class action approximately $1.5 billion US dollars, avoiding further…

    Read more …

Send this to a friend