The Productivity Commission (Commission) has released its draft report (Report) on the workplace relations framework.
In December 2014 the federal government requested the Commission to undertake an inquiry into the workplace relations framework, with the Commission releasing an issues paper on 22 January 2015.
Amongst the issues addressed in the Report are the fiercely debated changes to penalty rates for hospitality and retail workers and the future of minimum wages. Other recommendations include the introduction of the “Enterprise Contract” which aims to assist small businesses in varying the award of its employees and a host of changes to the unfair dismissal regime.
In the release, the Commission reports that the current workplace relations framework is not dysfunctional and the identified deficiencies can be addressed through repair rather than replacement. The Commission recommends, amongst other things:
- the retention of minimum wages and the introduction of complimentary policies rather than any increases to the minimum wage;
- the reduction of Sunday penalty rates for the hospitality, entertainment and retail industries to align with Saturday rates;
- changes to the penalty regime for unfair dismissal and the removal of the emphasis on reinstatement in unfair dismissal cases;
- changes to procedural aspects of the general protections regime and a cap on compensation payable in general protections cases;
- a recalibration of the test for sham contracting to limit the circumstances where an employer can “escape” prosecution for sham contracting;
- the introduction of a “no-disadvantage” test to replace the better of overall test for enterprise bargaining; and
- institutional reform of the Fair Work Commission;
The Commission is inviting public comment on the Report up until 18 September 2015 with the final report due by the end of November 2015. The Report can be viewed in its entirety at the Commission’s website.
Further information
If you would like further information or advice on employment and industrial relations law, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.
Related insights about employment law for employers
-
The “right to disconnect” from modern workplaces
The right to disconnect, as contained in Part 8 of the Fair Work Amendment (Closing Loopholes No. 2) Bill (Bill), gives employees the right to refuse contact from their employers (or related parties) outside of their working hours, unless the refusal is unreasonable. The changes in Part 8 amend various sections of the Fair Work…
-
Paid family and domestic violence leave for small business owners
The Fair Work Amendment (Paid Family and Domestic Violence Leave) Act 2022 (Cth) (Amending Act) provides that employers must provide 10 days paid leave to all employees. Part-time and casuals also eligible. Confidentiality and ability to take leave in single and separate periods must be respected.
-
Pay secrecy laws come into effect
The Fair Work Legislation Amendment Act 2022 (Cth) has been passed, introducing workplace laws and changing existing rules. Employers must now ensure job ads include minimum wage info and protect confidential info when determining pay. This article provides an overview of the implications.
-
Employers to provide for paid domestic violence leave
The Federal Government has proposed a bill that provides eligible employees with paid family and domestic violence leave. Find out more about the proposed changes and how they could affect your business.
-
Ex-employees and IP protection
Ex-employees can be a threat to a company’s intellectual property, but with the right contractual clauses, employers can protect their trademarks, copyright, patent, and design. Learn more about how to safeguard your company’s intellectual property.
-
High Court clarifies meaning of casual employment
The High Court has ruled on the definition of a casual employee – but what does it mean for your employment relationship?
-
Costs in unfair dismissal applications – part 4
This article examines the rare but possible situation in which an employee could be liable to pay the employer’s costs in an Application under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). Find out more about this situation and the case of Ewan Chapman v Ignis Labs Pty Ltd t/a Ignis Labs [2021] FWCFB 932.
-
Costs in unfair dismissal applications – part 3
This article looks at when costs orders can be imposed on a party to an unfair dismissal application, with an example of how costs orders can be imposed on a complainant employee.
-
Costs in unfair dismissal applications – part 2
The case of Clair Petersen v Kizuri Capital Pty Ltd, Maycorp Pty Ltd and Cricklewood Capital Pty Ltd T/A Allpet Products [2021] FWC 526 highlights the importance of parties engaging meaningfully and reasonably throughout the unfair dismissal process. A costs order was made against an employer who ignored settlement offers, demonstrating that such behaviour can…
