employment law

Productivity Commission publish report on the Workplace Relations Framework

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawEmployment law for employersProductivity Commission publish report on the Workplace Relations Framework

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

1–2 minutes

The Productivity Commission (Commission) has released its draft report (Report) on the workplace relations framework.

In December 2014 the federal government requested the Commission to undertake an inquiry into the workplace relations framework, with the Commission releasing an issues paper on 22 January 2015.

Amongst the issues addressed in the Report are the fiercely debated changes to penalty rates for hospitality and retail workers and the future of minimum wages.  Other recommendations include the introduction of the “Enterprise Contract” which aims to assist small businesses in varying the award of its employees and a host of changes to the unfair dismissal regime.

In the release, the Commission reports that the current workplace relations framework is not dysfunctional and the identified deficiencies can be addressed through repair rather than replacement.  The Commission recommends, amongst other things:

  • the retention of minimum wages and the introduction of complimentary policies rather than any increases to the minimum wage;
  • the reduction of Sunday penalty rates for the hospitality, entertainment and retail industries to align with Saturday rates;
  • changes to the penalty regime for unfair dismissal and the removal of the emphasis on reinstatement in unfair dismissal cases;
  • changes to procedural aspects of the general protections regime and a cap on compensation payable in general protections cases;
  • a recalibration of the test for sham contracting to limit the circumstances where an employer can “escape” prosecution for sham contracting;
  • the introduction of a “no-disadvantage” test to replace the better of overall test for enterprise bargaining; and
  • institutional reform of the Fair Work Commission;

The Commission is inviting public comment on the Report up until 18 September 2015 with the final report due by the end of November 2015.  The Report can be viewed in its entirety at the Commission’s website.

Further information

If you would like further information or advice on employment and industrial relations law, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion: 

Disclaimer

This article contains general commentary only.  You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.


Related insights about employment law for employers

  • Mere puffery vs misleading and deceptive conduct – where is the line

    Mere puffery vs misleading and deceptive conduct – where is the line

    In the case of Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54 (ACCC v TPG), the High Court of Australia (High Court) drew a distinction between mere puffery and representations with the intention of marketing.  This article explores the decision in ACCC v TPG and the distinction between puffery and…

    Read more …

  • Contractual and equitable obligations of confidence

    Contractual and equitable obligations of confidence

    This is an update to the article “Full Court clarifies confidentiality of supplier and contact info” published by Dundas Lawyers on 24 February 2026. On 20 April 2026, the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia (Court) allowed an appeal in the case of New Aim Pty Ltd v Leung (No 4) [2026] FCAFC…

    Read more …

  • AI evidence misleading Court:  Ba v Sterling Parts Australia

    AI evidence misleading Court: Ba v Sterling Parts Australia

    On 17 June 2026, Symons J delivered judgment in the case of Ba v Sterling Parts Australia Pty Ltd [2026] FedCFamC2G 1245 (Ba v Sterling Parts).  Ba v Sterling Parts was a proceeding brought by Weiman Ba (Applicant) in the second division of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Court).  Symons J dismissed…

    Read more …

  • Individual Flexibility Arrangements: an overview

    Individual Flexibility Arrangements: an overview

    Modern awards and enterprise agreements set out the minimum terms and conditions of employment for most Australian workers performing different roles.  The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) provides a mechanism by which an employer and an individual employee may, by agreement, adjust the operation of certain terms in their Award to better suit theircircumstances. …

    Read more …

  • White-Anting: An employer’s lawful termination guide

    White-Anting: An employer’s lawful termination guide

    Employees who use White Anting tactics to deliberately undermine management or disrupt workplace harmony may be summarily dismissed, provided the relevant legal conditions are met and a proper process is followed.  Following our 28 April 2026 article “White Anting: serious misconduct?“, this article provides practical “how to” steps for employers to lawfully dismiss employees who…

    Read more …

  • White Anting: serious misconduct?

    White Anting: serious misconduct?

    White Anting is an Australian term meaning to sabotage, undermine, or destroy an organisation, project, or person from within.  White Anting in the workplace often involves the quiet, insidious undermining of a colleague or superior through gossip, withholding information, exclusion, or spreading doubt.  White Anting  has been recognised by psychologists as a psychosocial hazard and…

    Read more …

  • The “right to disconnect” from modern workplaces

    The “right to disconnect” from modern workplaces

    The right to disconnect, as contained in Part 8 of the  Fair Work Amendment (Closing Loopholes No. 2) Bill (Bill), gives employees the right to refuse contact from their employers (or related parties) outside of their working hours, unless the refusal is unreasonable.  The changes in Part 8 amend various sections of the Fair Work…

    Read more …

  • Paid family and domestic violence leave for small businesses

    Paid family and domestic violence leave for small businesses

    The Fair Work Amendment (Paid Family and Domestic Violence Leave) Act 2022 (Cth) (Amending Act) provides that employers must provide 10 days paid leave to all employees. Part-time and casuals also eligible. Confidentiality and ability to take leave in single and separate periods must be respected.

    Read more …

  • Pay secrecy laws come into effect

    Pay secrecy laws come into effect

    The Fair Work Legislation Amendment Act 2022 (Cth) has been passed, introducing workplace laws and changing existing rules. Employers must now ensure job ads include minimum wage info and protect confidential info when determining pay. This article provides an overview of the implications.

    Read more …


Send this to a friend