The Federal Government is proposing to introduce legislation that will target the publication of offensive or harassing material aimed at children on social media websites.
The anticipated legislation (once passed) will establish the Children’s e-Safety Commissioner (Commissioner) to administer the new legislation. It is currently proposed that the Commissioner will have the power to:
issue take down notices for offensive material to individuals and social media websites;
require a person make an apology; and
refer serious matters to the police.
The legislation is expected to include a two (2) stage monitoring process for the removal of offensive material published on social media:
firstly, a social media website will be provided with the opportunity to adhere to take-down notices issued by the Commissioner; and
secondly, failure to comply with orders of the Commissioner will result in the imposition of financial penalties.
It is proposed that fines of up to $A17,000 per day could be issued to social networking websites that repeatedly fail to adhere to take-down notices issued by the Commissioner.
The legislation plans to be a real incentive for social media giants like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram to review content and take active steps to remove offensive material that fuel online bullying.
We will provide further information on this legislation as it comes to light.
Links and further references
Australian Government, Department of Communication, “Enhancing Online Safety for Children”, January 2014
Further information
If you need further information about social media law and how it may impact on your organisation, please contact us for an obligation free and confidential discussion.
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS. Legal Practice Director T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred) M: +61 419 726 535 E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstance.
The Albanese Labor Government has proposed a Digital Games Tax Offset (DGTO) of 30%, encouraging the growth of the digital games industry in Australia. Learn more about the DGTO and how it will create more jobs and international competitiveness.
The Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code 2021 (Cth) (2021 TGA Code) brings regulations for social media endorsements of therapeutic goods. Learn more about the changes and how to ensure compliance before they take effect on 1 January 2022.
This article examines the concept of implied terms in software contracts, including the requirements for implying a term, the process of determining implied terms, and examples of implied terms applied in software agreements.
The Federal Court of Australia has made a groundbreaking ruling on the patentability of works created by Artificial Intelligence. Explore the implications of this decision and what it could mean for the future of patent law.
The Crimes Legislation Amendment (Ransomware Action Plan) Bill 2022 is set to revolutionize the way cybercrime is prosecuted. Learn more about the changes it brings and the implications they have.
Decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) are a form of digital org on the blockchain, making decisions without centralised management. This article explores their legal grey area, safety and jurisdiction, and the Australian government’s recommendations for a new DAO structure to aid in its governance and success.
From 24 March 2022, any persons with a verified connection to Australia will be able to apply for a domain name ending in .au, also known as a direct name or second level name (Direct Name). Any business can apply for a Direct Name as long as they meet the eligibility criteria under the .au…
Australian government proposed the Ransomware Payments Bill 2021 (Cth) (Bill) to enforce mandatory reporting of ransomware payments. Penalties of up to $110,000 for non-compliance.
Explore the implications of virtual artworks created with the help of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and how this has caused a legal battle between a renowned fashion house and an American artist. Learn more about the copyright and trade mark infringement issues, and the implications of this case for the future of digital art.