software development disputes

Selling into the EU – what do the cookie laws mean for your website?

HomePrivate: BlogTechnology lawInternet lawSelling into the EU – what do the cookie laws mean for your website?

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

In May 2012, the United Kingdom’s statutory adoption of the  European Union (EU’s) Cookie Laws came into force.  The effect of the law is that website operators must obtain the express consent for a cookie to be saved and used on a users computer.  The law applies to organisations that host websites from within the EU and also to organisations based in the UK that host outside the jurisdiction.

According to wikipedia “a cookie  also known as an HTTP cookie, web cookie, or browser cookie, is a small piece of data sent from a website and stored in a user’s web browser while a user is browsing a website”.  The principle behind a cookie is that it assists the operator of the website to store information on a users use of a website which enhances the users experience, by for example remembering information which may have been added to a shopping cart.

In essence Directive 2009/136/EC of the Eurpoean Parliament and of the Council is a Privacy Law aimed at protecting consumers aninomity whilst browsing websites.  The UK’s adoption of Directive 2009 has received legislative recognition in the The Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (PECR Regulations).  The defininition contained in the PECR Regulations is somewhat broader in that it includes similar technologies for storing information, which, in effect is a catch all.

How to comply with the PECR Regulations?

At first glance there appears to be several ways to comply:

  • stop your webite’s use of cookies;
  • obtain consent in the form of an explicit Privacy Policy or Terms of Use; or
  • obtain implied consent;
  • obtain consent through ensuring that users have appropriate browser privacy settings;
  • obtain an express consent through the use of an express “I agree” link to an explanation of what information the cookie collects and how it operates.

Anyone with any experience in running a website will acknowledge that the last option is likely to be a barrier to adoption.  That said, the First Information Commissioner has issued a guide to compliance which provides a useful assistance for those wishing to comply with the PECR requirements.

What are the Penalties?

The UK’s First Information Commissioner has the power to issue penalties of up to 500,ooo pounds – so it’s far from a toothless tiger!

Does it apply to your website?

If you are an Australian company targetting the UK market it is not settled whether the PECR Regulations will apply to you.  The First Information Commissioner’s Guide provides that:

Organisations based outside of Europe with websites designed for the European market, or providing products or services to customers in Europe, should consider that their users in the UK and Europe will clearly expect information and choices about cookies to be provided“.

Therefore, it is unclear (other than on a choice of laws argument) whether the Cookie Laws apply to Australian organisations selling into the European market.

Further the PECR Regulations may have broader implications for developers of CMS Systems who may inadvertantly omit functionality which may allow for compliance with the Cookie Laws.

Further information

The UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office has provided a guide entitled “Guidance on the rules on use of cookies and similar technologies” to assist organisations to comply with the new cookie laws, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about technology law

  • AI businesses should have duty of care

    AI businesses should have duty of care

    In a recent interview with InnovationAus.com, Victorian Senator Michelle Ananda-Rajah (Senator) emphasised the need to adopt digital duty of care laws for artificial intelligence (AI) companies.[1]  As a representative of the ALP and former AI start-up founder, the Senator calls for the proposed digital duty of care to apply to AI companies.  If implemented, the…

    Read more …

  • Federal Court orders winding up of crypto mining investment scheme

    Federal Court orders winding up of crypto mining investment scheme

    The Federal Court of Australia delivered judgment in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v NGS Crypto Pty Ltd (No 5) [2025] FCA 1611, on 18 December 2025 ordering the winding up of two (2) cryptocurrency related entities after finding that they operated an unlicensed financial services business and an unregistered managed investment scheme in contravention…

    Read more …

  • Online Safety – is your online business a DIS or a RES?

    Online Safety – is your online business a DIS or a RES?

    Whether your online business has to comply with the obligations contained in the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) (OSA), and related standards and industry codes will largely depend on how your business is classified because of the functionality it provides to end users in Australia.

    Read more …

  • Bill to allow victims of AI deepfakes to sue for emotional damages

    Bill to allow victims of AI deepfakes to sue for emotional damages

    On 24 November 2025, Senator David Pocock introduced a private Senator’s bill, the Online Safety and Other Legislation Amendment (My Face, My Rights) Bill 2025 (Cth) (Bill) to amend the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) (Online Safety Act) and the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) (Privacy Act). 

    Read more …

  • Malcolm Burrows on ABC’s “Legal Eagles” segment – Deepfakes

    Malcolm Burrows on ABC’s “Legal Eagles” segment – Deepfakes

    On 3 December 2025, Malcolm Burrows appeared live on Katherine Feeney’s ABC Radio program, “Legal Eagles” as the Technology and Intellectual Property Lawyer to discuss the proposed amendments to the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) through the introduction of the Online Safety and other legislation Amendment (My Face Rights) Bill (Cth) 2025 (My Face Rights…

    Read more …

  • Federal Gov rules out copyright text and data mining exception for AI

    Federal Gov rules out copyright text and data mining exception for AI

    On 26 October 2025, the Attorney-General, Hon Michelle Rowland MP, published a media release reiterating that the current Federal Government will not introduce a text and data mining (TDM) exception to copyright infringement in the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Copyright Act).  The Attorney-General’s Department will instead engage in further consultations with members of the Copyright…

    Read more …


Posted

in

, ,
Send this to a friend