Corporate law Brisbane

The legal requirements of crowdfunding in business

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawCorporate lawThe legal requirements of crowdfunding in business

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–4 minutes

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) defines equity-based crowd-sourced funding (CSF) as:

… a company raising funds—usually through an online intermediary—from a large number of individual investors who make relatively small financial contributions to the company… [and] a fundraising option for start-ups or small to medium-sized companies.[1]

Part 6D.3A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) provides a regulatory framework for CSF (Regime).  Section 738G(1)(a)-(f) of the Act requires a company wishing to offer an issue of shares though CSF (CSF Offer) must:

  • issue shares that are of the specified class;
  • be an eligible company (Eligible CSF Company);
  • not offer more than the issuer cap (Issuer Cap); and
  • not reinvest in raised funds other entities or schemes.

This article discusses these requirements.

Shares issued of the specified class

Section 761E(1)-(2) of the Act defines an issue as the first time a share is made available to a person by the issuer.[2]  This makes transfers within a company or the sale of already issued shares ineligible under the Regime.[3]

Regulation 6D.3A.01(1) of the Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth) (Regulations) provides that fully paid ordinary shares are the only securities class permitted in a CSF Offer under the Regime.  This means that a company cannot offer an issue of partly paid or preference shares nor options or debentures.[4]

Eligible CSF Companies

Section 738H(1) of the Act provides Eligible CSF Companies are:

  • public companies and limited by shares; or
  • proprietary companies with at least two (2) directors.

The section also requires companies to:

  • be unlisted;
  • have its principal place of business located and the majority of director’s residing in Australia;
  • have a consolidated gross assets value of less than $25 million;[5]
  • have a consolidated annual revenue value that is less than $25 million;[6] and
  • have a primary purpose that is not investing in securities.

The Issuer Cap

Section 738G(2) of the Act provides that the sum of an Eligible CSF Company’s:

  • maximum amount sought to be raised;
  • total amounts raised one year after the CSF Offer; and
  • total amount raised in undisclosed offerings one year before the CSF Offer,

cannot exceed $5 million.

Takeaways

Only private companies limited by shares or proprietary companies with two (2) or more directors can raise funds by issuing equity through CSF.  These companies must be unlisted and primarily conduct business within Australia to utilise CSF in the country.  The company must also have gross assets and revenue values of less than $25 million, respectively.  The shares must be issued meaning the first time they are sold on the market.  The issue must be of ordinary fully paid shares meaning transfers within the company are not allowed under the Regime.  Finally, the sum of the maximum sought to be raised, amounts raised one (1) year after the CSF Offer and total raised that is undisclosed one (1) year before the CSF offer, must be equal or less to $5 million.

Links and further references

Related materials

Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Regulatory Guide 261 Crowd-sourced funding: Guide for companies (June 2020)

Legislation

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth)

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth)

Further information about equity issuing and raising

If you need advice on equity issuing and raising for your company, or obligations and rights that may apply to you, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:

[1]  Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Regulatory Guide 261 Crowd-sourced funding: Guide for companies (June 2020), RG 261.1-4.

[2] See also Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 9, 761, 1023B; The Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) s 12BAA.

[3] See also Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 761E(7); Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Regulatory Guide 261 Crowd-sourced funding: Guide for companies (June 2020), RG 261.37.

[4] Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Regulatory Guide 261 Crowd-sourced funding: Guide for companies (June 2020), RG 261.37.

[5] See also Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 738H(a)(i).

[6] See also Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 738H(b)(i).


Related insights about equity issuing and raising

  • ACCC publishes guidance on cash acceptance industry codes

    ACCC publishes guidance on cash acceptance industry codes

    From 1 January 2026, new cash acceptance obligations have commenced under industry codes applying to supermarkets and fuel retailers, overseen by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).  In March 2026, the ACCC published guidance on these newly enforced regulations, reminding retailers to consider their obligations before penalties apply on 1 July 2026.

    Read more …

  • Valuing ESS Interests

    Valuing ESS Interests

    A company, whether listed or unlisted, can grant its employees an interest in its equity (ESS Interest), including through an employee share scheme (ESS) or employee share option plan (ESOP).  There are restrictions contained in both the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) and Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) (ITAA) that determine the price…

    Read more …

  • ESS vs ESOP – what’s the difference?

    ESS vs ESOP – what’s the difference?

    Employee share schemes (ESS) and employee share option plans (ESOP) are commonly used by corporations to incentivise employees and align performance with company growth by providing them with an interest in the company.  While the terms are often used interchangeably, they have distinct legal and structural differences under Australian law.  This article explains the key…

    Read more …

  • Disputed ESOP – Selak v National Tiles Co Pty Ltd

    Disputed ESOP – Selak v National Tiles Co Pty Ltd

    In the case of Selak v National Tiles, the Vic Supreme Court considered whether a company breached an option agreement governed by the terms of an Employee Share Option Plan (ESOP) by requiring an option holder to execute an undisclosed shareholders’ agreement as a condition of exercising vested options.  

    Read more …

  • Bill to allow victims of AI deepfakes to sue for emotional damages

    Bill to allow victims of AI deepfakes to sue for emotional damages

    On 24 November 2025, Senator David Pocock introduced a private Senator’s bill, the Online Safety and Other Legislation Amendment (My Face, My Rights) Bill 2025 (Cth) (Bill) to amend the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) (Online Safety Act) and the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) (Privacy Act). 

    Read more …

  • Can a unit trust be wound up by the oppression remedies

    Can a unit trust be wound up by the oppression remedies

    The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corps Act) grants the Courts the power to award remedies under section 233, specifically designed to address situations of oppression within corporate entities under section 232.  These remedies, also known as the “Oppression Remedies”, aim to resolve situations where a company’s conduct unfairly prejudices its members or shareholders.  While primarily…

    Read more …

  • Business Lawyer

    Business Lawyer

    Business Lawyer, commercial and contracts and advisory lawyer, 4-10 years PAE, and $ negotiable performance based, depending on experience.

    Read more …

  • Directors’ obligations to comply with Accounting Standards

    Directors’ obligations to comply with Accounting Standards

    Directors are personally liable for ensuring their company operates in accordance with corporate governance and accounting standards.  Obligations contained in part 2M.2 and 2M.3 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) outline obligations for companies to keep financial records and prepare annual financial and director’s reports.  Sections 180 and 344 of the Corporations Act…

    Read more …

  • OAIC publishes new guidance for under-16s social media ban

    OAIC publishes new guidance for under-16s social media ban

    On 10 October 2025, the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC), led by Privacy Commissioner, Ms Carly Kind, released a twenty-nine (29) page Privacy Guidance on Part 4A (Social Media Minimum Age) of the Online Safety Act 2021 (New Guidance).  This New Guidance details the privacy obligations for Age-Restricted Social Media Platforms (Restricted Platforms)…

    Read more …


Posted

in

, ,
Send this to a friend