Corporate law Brisbane

The legal requirements of crowdfunding in business

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawCorporate lawThe legal requirements of crowdfunding in business

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–4 minutes

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) defines equity-based crowd-sourced funding (CSF) as:

… a company raising funds—usually through an online intermediary—from a large number of individual investors who make relatively small financial contributions to the company… [and] a fundraising option for start-ups or small to medium-sized companies.[1]

Part 6D.3A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) provides a regulatory framework for CSF (Regime).  Section 738G(1)(a)-(f) of the Act requires a company wishing to offer an issue of shares though CSF (CSF Offer) must:

  • issue shares that are of the specified class;
  • be an eligible company (Eligible CSF Company);
  • not offer more than the issuer cap (Issuer Cap); and
  • not reinvest in raised funds other entities or schemes.

This article discusses these requirements.

Shares issued of the specified class

Section 761E(1)-(2) of the Act defines an issue as the first time a share is made available to a person by the issuer.[2]  This makes transfers within a company or the sale of already issued shares ineligible under the Regime.[3]

Regulation 6D.3A.01(1) of the Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth) (Regulations) provides that fully paid ordinary shares are the only securities class permitted in a CSF Offer under the Regime.  This means that a company cannot offer an issue of partly paid or preference shares nor options or debentures.[4]

Eligible CSF Companies

Section 738H(1) of the Act provides Eligible CSF Companies are:

  • public companies and limited by shares; or
  • proprietary companies with at least two (2) directors.

The section also requires companies to:

  • be unlisted;
  • have its principal place of business located and the majority of director’s residing in Australia;
  • have a consolidated gross assets value of less than $25 million;[5]
  • have a consolidated annual revenue value that is less than $25 million;[6] and
  • have a primary purpose that is not investing in securities.

The Issuer Cap

Section 738G(2) of the Act provides that the sum of an Eligible CSF Company’s:

  • maximum amount sought to be raised;
  • total amounts raised one year after the CSF Offer; and
  • total amount raised in undisclosed offerings one year before the CSF Offer,

cannot exceed $5 million.

Takeaways

Only private companies limited by shares or proprietary companies with two (2) or more directors can raise funds by issuing equity through CSF.  These companies must be unlisted and primarily conduct business within Australia to utilise CSF in the country.  The company must also have gross assets and revenue values of less than $25 million, respectively.  The shares must be issued meaning the first time they are sold on the market.  The issue must be of ordinary fully paid shares meaning transfers within the company are not allowed under the Regime.  Finally, the sum of the maximum sought to be raised, amounts raised one (1) year after the CSF Offer and total raised that is undisclosed one (1) year before the CSF offer, must be equal or less to $5 million.

Links and further references

Related materials

Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Regulatory Guide 261 Crowd-sourced funding: Guide for companies (June 2020)

Legislation

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth)

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth)

Further information about equity issuing and raising

If you need advice on equity issuing and raising for your company, or obligations and rights that may apply to you, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:

[1]  Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Regulatory Guide 261 Crowd-sourced funding: Guide for companies (June 2020), RG 261.1-4.

[2] See also Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 9, 761, 1023B; The Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) s 12BAA.

[3] See also Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 761E(7); Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Regulatory Guide 261 Crowd-sourced funding: Guide for companies (June 2020), RG 261.37.

[4] Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Regulatory Guide 261 Crowd-sourced funding: Guide for companies (June 2020), RG 261.37.

[5] See also Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 738H(a)(i).

[6] See also Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 738H(b)(i).


Related insights about equity issuing and raising

  • Incentivising distributors – key contractual considerations

    Incentivising distributors – key contractual considerations

    Incentivising distributors is an effective way to increase sales, reduce inventory and accelerate adoption of new products. This article explores various methods, from incentive programs to vacations and gamification, plus advice on measuring performance and accountability.

    Read more …

  • Federal Court class actions – requirements explained

    Federal Court class actions – requirements explained

    This article provides an overview of the mechanics behind a Class Action in the Federal Court of Australia. It covers the requirements to commence the action, the ability for members to opt out, and the limits on Class Actions, giving readers a comprehensive understanding of the process and obligations.

    Read more …

  • Registration of .au domain names – what does this mean for businesses?

    Registration of .au domain names – what does this mean for businesses?

    From 24 March 2022, any persons with a verified connection to Australia will be able to apply for a domain name ending in .au, also known as a direct name or second level name (Direct Name).  Any business can apply for a Direct Name as long as they meet the eligibility criteria under the .au…

    Read more …

  • Director’s right to review company records

    Director’s right to review company records

    As a director, it is important to understand your obligations and rights, including the right to access the company books. Explore this further in this article, which examines the case of Oswal v Burrup Holdings Limited [2011] FCA 609 and the implications of a company refusing a director access.

    Read more …

  • Use of a competitors trade marks for comparative advertising

    Use of a competitors trade marks for comparative advertising

    Comparative advertising can be a powerful tool, but it must be done within the bounds of the law. Learn more about the legal implications of comparative advertising in Australia, including the case of GlaxoSmithKline Australia Pty Ltd v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 1.

    Read more …

  • Uber found in breach of Australian privacy laws

    Uber found in breach of Australian privacy laws

    This article provides an overview of interesting decisions of Australian Courts in Corporate Law, Technology Law and Intellectual Property. With cases on Trade Marks, Copyright, Defamation, Negligence, Joint Ventures and Confidential Information, it is an invaluable resource for anyone interested in these areas.

    Read more …

  • Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code 2021 update

    Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code 2021 update

    The Therapeutic Goods Administration has released the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code 2021 (Cth), introducing changes to distinguish between physical and online therapeutic goods, updates to medical device and medicine advertising, and more. Get the details to stay informed and ensure compliance with the new rules.

    Read more …

  • 7-Eleven customer survey: implied consent?

    7-Eleven customer survey: implied consent?

    The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner found 7-Eleven Stores Pty Ltd are in breach of the Australian Privacy Principles (APP’s). Learn more about the findings, implications, and how businesses can comply with the APP’s.

    Read more …

  • Use of confidential information – the springboard injunction

    Use of confidential information – the springboard injunction

    This article examines the UK decision of Forse & ors v Secarma Ltd & ors [2019] EWCA Civ 215, which discussed the legal concept of a springboard injunction, and its implications in Australia. The Court must consider similar principles to determine if an injunction should be granted.

    Read more …


Posted

in

, ,
Send this to a friend