Corporate law Brisbane

What are Teaming Agreements?

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawCorporate lawWhat are Teaming Agreements?

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–4 minutes

A teaming agreement (Teaming Agreement) is a contract between two or more parties (Team Members) that is used to regulate the rights and obligations where one of them pursues a tender or contract with a with a third party (Prime Contract).  Once the Prime Contract is entered into between the third party and Team Member # 1, a sub-contract is executed between Team Member # 1 and the other Team Member(s) to enable Team Member # 1 to discharge its obligations under the Prime Contract. 

The benefits of Teaming Agreements are that they allow parties to pool resources for a limited purpose (Permitted Purpose), without necessarily requiring the establishment of a joint venture entity – however, the Team Members could do this if they wanted to.

Common clauses in Teaming Agreements

A Teaming Agreement is flexible depending on the resources of the Team Members and the contract they hope to pursue, however, common clauses include:

  • confidentiality – neither Team Member may disclose the confidential information of the other;
  • dispute resolution – which jurisdiction’s laws govern the agreement and are there are any mandatory pre-filing dispute resolution practices, such as mediation or arbitration;
  • intellectual property – who owns the intellectual property created during the term of the Agreement, and is any intellectual property assigned or licenced from one Team Member to the other;
  • liability – neither Team Member is liable to the other in respect of any loss or damage suffered or incurred in respect of goods or services supplied pursuant to this Agreement, except to the extent that the loss or damage is caused by resources contributed by one Team Member infringing any intellectual property rights;
  • leadership – who controls the contracting process and how is communication to be regulated;
  • management – a group of representatives from each Team Member (Teaming Committee) usually meets regularly to manage the pursuit of the contractor;
  • non-circumvention – neither Party should submit or participate in independent proposals to the third party and both parties should act in good faith when discharging their obligations under the Agreement;
  • parties – the relationship between the parties is that of prime contractor and subcontractor, not that of principal and agent;
  • resource contributions – what property, human resources and financial resources are the Team Members required to provide in order to tender for the Prime Contract, and does the other Team Member have a licence to use these resources; and
  • termination – what events trigger a right to termination and how much notice (if any) is required.

Common issues with Teaming Agreements

One limitation with Teaming Agreements is that they need to be renegotiated for every new Prime Contract.  There is also the risk that one Team Member will go around or circumvent the other Team Member in order to contract directly with the third party, or that one Team Member will solicit clients or employees from the other.  This is why clear non-circumvention clauses are important elements of Teaming Agreements.

Links and further references

Cases

BNWP Enterprises Pty Ltd v Unisys Australia Ltd [1997] FCA 1– in this case the parties’ tender on the Prime Contract was successful but they were unable to conclude negotiations on a Sub-contract.  The Federal Court held that the Teaming Agreement was a contract for a joint bid, therefore the Prime Contract was subject to the parties entering into a binding Sub-contract.

Awards

Lawyer Monthly Legal Awards 2016 - Winner Joint Ventures Law Firm of the Year

Further information about Teaming Agreements and Joint Ventures

If you need assistance preparing a Teaming Agreement or a Joint Venture, please telephone me for an obligation free and confidential discussion.


Related insights about Teaming Agreements and Joint Ventures

  • Shareholders’ right to information

    Shareholders’ right to information

    When shareholders are restricted from accessing company information, it may be a sign of a dispute. The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) provides mechanisms for minority shareholders to obtain relevant information, but they must prove they are acting in ‘good faith’ and ‘for a proper purpose’.

    Read more …

  • Is your liquidated damages clause a penalty?

    Is your liquidated damages clause a penalty?

    This article explores the enforceability of liquidated damages clauses in contracts, examining tests, and precedent cases to determine when a clause is a “genuine pre-estimate of damages” and not a penalty.

    Read more …

  • Director loans – can they be recalled anytime?

    Director loans – can they be recalled anytime?

    This article explores the legal considerations of when loans between family members or directors of a company are due and payable on demand. Learn more about the relevant case law and express terms that may be implied by conduct.

    Read more …

  • What exactly is a partly-paid share?

    What exactly is a partly-paid share?

    Investing in partly-paid shares can come with unique benefits, such as voting rights and profits. Learn more about the legal and financial implications of this type of investment and the payment process involved.

    Read more …

  • Can a third party be held accountable for breaching director duties?

    Can a third party be held accountable for breaching director duties?

    This article examines how the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) holds third parties “knowingly involved” in director misconduct accountable. Learn more about the tests, cases, and damages that can result from company business gone wrong.

    Read more …

  • Preventing ex-employees from using your client list

    Preventing ex-employees from using your client list

    This article examines a Federal Court of Australia decision to grant an interlocutory injunction against a former employee. Learn how the Court reached its decision, what businesses can take away from the case, and find out how to protect your business from similar breaches.

    Read more …

  • Holding company responsibility for subsidiary debts

    Holding company responsibility for subsidiary debts

    Uncover the factors that affect a holding company’s liability for its subsidiary’s debts. Learn when a holding company can be liable and what defences are available to protect it.

    Read more …

  • ASIC v Macdonald – have the lessons really been forgotten?

    ASIC v Macdonald – have the lessons really been forgotten?

    The case of Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 11) [2009] NSWSC 287 highlights the importance of properly documenting Directors’ meetings to ensure they are legally compliant. This article examines the facts of the case, the basis of The Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s argument, and the principles of preparing minutes of Directors’…

    Read more …

  • The Crowd-sourced Funding Bill 2016 – overview

    The Crowd-sourced Funding Bill 2016 – overview

    Revised from the 2015 Bill, the 2016 Bill provides a regulatory framework for Crowd Sourced Funding (CSF) with eligibility requirements, obligations for Intermediaries facilitating the CSF Offers, and restrictions on advertising to protect retail investors.

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend