technology lawyer

What exactly is an Initial Coin Offering?

HomePrivate: BlogLegal insightsWhat exactly is an Initial Coin Offering?

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–5 minutes

With the rise of cryptocurrencies (think Bitcoin and Ethereum), start-up businesses have engaged in a new method of sourcing funding from would-be investors – Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs).  ICOs are becoming an increasingly popular method for new businesses to raise money in a short period of time with minimal effort.  As ICOs are a new concept utilising new technologies, they are yet to be regulated in Australia.  However, with the rise in popularity of ICOs in Australia, and around the world, whether or not ICOs will be regulated is a question many expected to be answered shortly.

What happens when a company does an ICO?

An ICO is a process whereby a company raises capital through the offering of secured tokens of cryptocurrencies.  According to Wikipedia, a cryptocurrency is:

a digital asset designed to work as a medium of exchange using cryptography to secure the transactions and to control the creation of additional units of the currency”.

These tokens are unique to the corporate issuer, thereby aligning the value of the tokens to the value (being the success) of the company.

Why is an ICO different from an IPO?

While an ICO may sound very similar to an IPO (Initial Public Offering) of shares on a stock exchange, there are fundamental differences that investors must be aware of.  These differences include:

  • Where an IPO entitles the purchaser to an equitable stake in the company (a share), an ICO entitles the purchaser to a cryptocurrency ‘token’ that is linked specifically to the company. Unlike the share, the token does not entitle the holder to any “ownership” rights in the company – such as the right to vote on decisions of the company or a right to receive a share of the profit.
  • Where an IPO requires a company to comply with listing rules of the relevant stock exchange and the corporate laws of the respective country, such as the requirement to prepare detailed disclosure documents (generally summarised in the form of a prospectus), there are no such guidelines for ICOs. With that said, companies undertaking an ICO will usually prepare a brief outline of the business opportunity in a ‘white paper’ in order to provide some overview to investors of the potential of the company. As there are not strict rules regulating ICOs (at this time), white papers will generally be far less detailed than their IPO counterparts.
  • Whereas shares purchased through an IPO entitle the holder to a proportion of the profits of the company (commonly referred to as dividends), holders of tokens from an ICO will not receive such payments. The profit to be made on tokens are from the rise in value of the token which will occur as demand for the token increases (similar to the share price movements from an IPO). In this sense, many consider ICOs to involve a large degree of ‘speculation’; but the same may be said of many micro-cap listings on the ASX.

Regulation of ICO’s in Australia

As ICOs are unlike capital raising methods previously used, it presents many unique scenarios for regulators – is an ICO a financial product capable of being regulated, and if so, what is the best method of regulating it?  Are they in fact equities at all?

In Australia, there is currently no detailed regulation of ICOs. While ASIC does provide some consideration of cryptocurrencies (see ASIC Information Sheet 219)(and ASIC’s MoneySmart Virtual currencies information), ASIC has yet to set out whether or not it will regulate ICOs undertaken in Australia.

While ASIC has not yet provided its view on the regulation of ICOs, ASIC Chairman Mr Greg Medcraft, in a recent interview with CoinDesk, did not close the door on regulating ICOs.  As Mr Medcraft noted, while ICOs may not be equities (within the traditional meaning), they may be considered financial products which may be regulated by ASIC.

ASIC is expected to announce whether it will regulate ICOs shortly.

Links and further references

Australian Securities and Investments Commission

Evaluating Distributed Ledger Technology – Information Sheet 219
Money Smart – Virtual currencies

Further information about financial services licencing

If you need assistance regarding financial services licencing, technology law or you are considering doing an initial coin offering, please telephone me for an obligation free and confidential discussion.


Related insights about financial services licencing

  • Data breach compliance and response plans

    Data breach compliance and response plans

    Dundas Lawyers create tailored data breach response plans to ensure compliance with the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). Plans include actions, registers, records, tests and tasks. Get an obligation-free and confidential discussion to learn more.

    Read more …

  • Are email trackers admissible as evidence?

    Are email trackers admissible as evidence?

    The Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) is silent, but the Court considers email trackers and read receipts as evidence in civil and intellectual property litigation. As seen in Jaffari v Grabowski [2013] NSWCA 114, sender’s receipt of confirmation of email relay is a matter for the recipient.

    Read more …

  • Is AI recognized as an inventor under the Patents Act 1990?

    Is AI recognized as an inventor under the Patents Act 1990?

    The ruling of Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 has opened the door for artificial intelligence-created inventions to be eligible for patent protection. Learn more about the implications of this groundbreaking decision.

    Read more …

  • The Australian Cyber Law Map – overview

    The Australian Cyber Law Map – overview

    The Australian Cyber Law Map provides clarity on ever-changing legal landscape, covering commercial enterprises, cyber offences, infrastructure, international law, national security and personal rights. A source for understanding laws and providing safety/security in the digital age.

    Read more …

  • Explaining Australia’s Media Bargaining Code

    Explaining Australia’s Media Bargaining Code

    The News Media Bargaining Code (NMBC) is quickly moving through Parliament and looks likely to become law. It requires digital platforms, such as Facebook and Google, to negotiate remuneration with News Companies for providing their media services. Non-compliance could result in hefty civil penalties.

    Read more …

  • My client poached my software developers – what can I do?

    My client poached my software developers – what can I do?

    This article examines how professional service businesses can protect their investment in employees from clients poaching them. It looks at potential clauses such as client agreements, non-solicitation of employees, restraints of trade, confidential information, copyright and more.

    Read more …

  • Patent granted for software tracking user actions

    Patent granted for software tracking user actions

    A decision by Australian Patent Office provides insight into patentable subject matter for computer-implemented inventions. Case of Facebook, Inc. [2020] APO 19 is a successful example of technical improvement in computer-implemented method, resulting in patentability even with generic computer implementation.

    Read more …

  • Use of IRUs in a telecommunications capacity

    Use of IRUs in a telecommunications capacity

    Learn how to structure IRUs for tax compliance and ensure your cable system capacity services are secure. Discover the key elements you need to include in your agreement to guarantee exclusive access and economic ownership rights.

    Read more …

  • Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth) overview

    Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth) overview

    Online gaming operators in Australia must abide by the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth). Learn more about the rules and regulations, and the consequences when they are not followed.

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend