employment law

Why employers must follow process

HomeBlogCommercial lawEmployment law for employersWhy employers must follow process

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Employers appearing at the Fair Work Commission may be shocked when the unfair dismissal claim against them is upheld despite the dismissal being for a valid reason.

This occurred recently in F v Bunnings Group Ltd, t/a Bunnings [2014], (Bunnings) where the employer had a valid reason for dismissing an employee after a brawling incident, however the dismissal was considered to be harsh, unjust and unreasonable because the investigation and disciplinary procedure was not appropriately conducted.

In cases like this, terminations are found to be unfair on the basis that the employee has not been given procedural fairness. There may have been no paper trial or documentation or the employee was not notified of the reason why their employment may be terminated or not provided with an opportunity to respond to their actions or to rectify their behaviour.

Employers have learnt, often at great cost to their business, that procedural fairness, also known as natural justice or due process, is generally just as important as having a valid reason for termination.

When disciplining employees for misconduct or poor performance, employers must follow a clear and consistent process which complies with the procedural fairness requirements stipulated in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

To assist employers develop a compliant process, consider the following:

  • put the allegations or issues to the employee in sufficient detail, preferably in writing;
  • provide the employee with an opportunity to respond to the allegations before any decision is made;
  • allow the employee to have a support person at any meetings where the misconduct or poor performance is discussed;
  • warn the employee that failure to improve may result in termination of employment;
  • an incremental process is advisable including performance appraisals and warning/s;
  • practical efforts should be made to help the employee improve their performance;
  • do not rely on prior warnings which have been addressed by improved conduct;
  • take the employee’s response into account before a decision is made about termination; and
  • make sure there is a paper trail of file notes, warnings, and meetings to demonstrate a process has been followed.

By having the structures and processes in place to manage and monitor an employees’ performance, such as position descriptions, policies and procedures, and performance reviews, employers will be well positioned to defend any potential unfair dismissal claim. Once in place, it is equally important to ensure management follow the processes and utilise the documents as the employer can use these as evidence in their defence.

Links and further references

Cases

F v Bunnings Group Ltd, t/a Bunnings [2014] FWC 1869

George Szentpaly v Basin Sands Logistics Pty Ltd [2013] FWC 4213

Legislation

Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)

Fair Work Commission Unfair Dismissals Benchbook

Further information

Terminating employees can be a complex process and every situation is different, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:

Doyles Recommended TMT Lawyer 2024

Related insights about employment law for employers

  • The “right to disconnect” from modern workplaces

    The “right to disconnect” from modern workplaces

    The right to disconnect, as contained in Part 8 of the  Fair Work Amendment (Closing Loopholes No. 2) Bill (Bill), gives employees the right to refuse contact from their employers (or related parties) outside of their working hours, unless the refusal is unreasonable.  The changes in Part 8 amend various sections of the Fair Work…

    Read more …

  • Paid family and domestic violence leave for small business owners

    Paid family and domestic violence leave for small business owners

    The Fair Work Amendment (Paid Family and Domestic Violence Leave) Act 2022 (Cth) (Amending Act) provides that employers must provide 10 days paid leave to all employees. Part-time and casuals also eligible. Confidentiality and ability to take leave in single and separate periods must be respected.

    Read more …

  • Pay secrecy laws come into effect

    Pay secrecy laws come into effect

    The Fair Work Legislation Amendment Act 2022 (Cth) has been passed, introducing workplace laws and changing existing rules. Employers must now ensure job ads include minimum wage info and protect confidential info when determining pay. This article provides an overview of the implications.

    Read more …

  • Employers to provide for paid domestic violence leave

    Employers to provide for paid domestic violence leave

    The Federal Government has proposed a bill that provides eligible employees with paid family and domestic violence leave. Find out more about the proposed changes and how they could affect your business.

    Read more …

  • Ex-employees and IP protection

    Ex-employees and IP protection

    Ex-employees can be a threat to a company’s intellectual property, but with the right contractual clauses, employers can protect their trademarks, copyright, patent, and design. Learn more about how to safeguard your company’s intellectual property.

    Read more …

  • High Court clarifies meaning of casual employment

    High Court clarifies meaning of casual employment

    The High Court has ruled on the definition of a casual employee – but what does it mean for your employment relationship?

    Read more …

  • Costs in unfair dismissal applications – part 4

    Costs in unfair dismissal applications – part 4

    This article examines the rare but possible situation in which an employee could be liable to pay the employer’s costs in an Application under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). Find out more about this situation and the case of Ewan Chapman v Ignis Labs Pty Ltd t/a Ignis Labs [2021] FWCFB 932.

    Read more …

  • Costs in unfair dismissal applications – part 3

    Costs in unfair dismissal applications – part 3

    This article looks at when costs orders can be imposed on a party to an unfair dismissal application, with an example of how costs orders can be imposed on a complainant employee.

    Read more …

  • Costs in unfair dismissal applications – part 2

    Costs in unfair dismissal applications – part 2

    The case of Clair Petersen v Kizuri Capital Pty Ltd, Maycorp Pty Ltd and Cricklewood Capital Pty Ltd T/A Allpet Products [2021] FWC 526 highlights the importance of parties engaging meaningfully and reasonably throughout the unfair dismissal process. A costs order was made against an employer who ignored settlement offers, demonstrating that such behaviour can…

    Read more …

Send this to a friend