Lawyers for litigation

Wear v Montere E-College Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 434

Wear v Montere E-College Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 434

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for default judgment under r 5.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where the respondent has not participated in the proceeding or indicated any intention to defend claim – where applicant has sufficiently pleaded claim – application granted

Related cases – default judgement

  • Wear v Montere E-College Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 434

    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for default judgment under r 5.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where the respondent has not participated in the proceeding or indicated any intention to defend claim – where applicant has sufficiently pleaded claim – application granted Related cases – default judgement Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2025/2025fca0434For…

  • Paco Nominees PL v Ella Secret Australia PL (Default Judgment) [2025] FCA 366

    TRADE MARKS – default judgment – respondents’ failure to comply with orders and appear – claim of trade mark infringement – default judgment granted PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for default judgment pursuant to r 5.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether appropriate to grant injunction – whether satisfied that an order…

  • Hugo Boss AG v Hardge [2024] FCA 1325

    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for default judgment pursuant to r 5.23(2)(c) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where substituted service orders made – where respondent in default of appearance – allegations of trade mark infringement, misleading and deceptive conduct and passing off – whether the applicant is entitled to relief – relief…

Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2025/2025fca0434For more information, see the original judgement.

Posted

in

Send this to a friend