Corporate law Brisbane

What ASIC’s new DIN laws mean for Australian directors

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–5 minutes

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has announced that, from 1 July 2027, obligations surrounding director identification numbers (Director IDs) will change.  The amendments to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) which are set to commence will require that companies provide Director IDs to ASIC.  This article will briefly explain the function of a Director ID and the changes that will apply to Australian businesses.

What is a Director ID?

A Director ID is a unique identifier containing fifteen (15) digits which is given to a company director or someone who intends to become a company director.  A Director ID will be a requirement where an individual is the director of:

  • an Australian company;
  • a registered Australian body;
  • a registered foreign company; or
  • an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation.

If a company has multiple directors, each director’s ID must be provided to ASIC.

What do the new changes entail?

Currently, each director must have a Director ID.  However, there is no requirement under the Corporations Act or any legislative instrument imposing that a director provide their Director ID to their company.  While a director must provide personal details, there is no need to give a specific identifier.

The Treasury Laws Amendments (Business Registries Stabilisation and Uplift) Bill 2026 (Cth) (Bill) will amend the Corporations Act.  Under section 205B of the Corporations Act, a director or alternate director will have to notify ASIC of their Director ID.[1]  The Bill also gives ASIC several powers, including the power to disqualify a person from managing corporations for up to three (3) years in the event of non-compliance.[2]

The changes can be summarised as follows:[3]

  • Each director must provide their Director ID to their company.
  • Companies and other registrable bodies must provide Director IDs to ASIC during standard reporting processes.
  • ASIC can publish Director ID information on its registers.
  • The Registrar has an express power to correct Director ID information.
  • ASIC can disqualify directors for not applying for a Director ID when directed by the Registrar.
  • A failure to comply with certain requirements of the Director ID regime may incur an infringement notice, issued by ASIC under Part 9.4AB of the Corporations Act.

The purpose of the new changes is to:

  • reduce the risk of fraud and identity misuse;
  • improve the accuracy of company records;
  • make it easier to identify company directors; and
  • improve the quality and usability of registry information“.[4]

Offences and penalties

The following offences and penalties will be introduced under the Bill:[5]

  • Section 1272C – failure to have a Director ID when required to do so – 60 penalty units
  • Section 1272D – failure to apply for a Director ID when directed by the Registrar – 60 penalty units
  • Section 1272G – applying for multiple Director IDs – 1 year imprisonment
  • Section 1272H – misrepresenting Director ID – 1 year imprisonment

Key considerations for businesses

It is a requirement that, before becoming a director, an individual applies for a Director ID.  Directors and businesses should remain aware of this requirement, noting that the Australian Business Registry Services (ABRS) is the body which issues and administers Director IDs.  Directors or prospective directors should apply for a Director ID through the ABRS website.[6]

ASIC recommends that businesses ensure company and director details are up to date by taking the following steps:[7]

  • checking that company details are up to date;
  • confirming all current directors are listed; and
  • updating any incorrect names, addresses, or contact details.

Links and further references

Legislation

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Treasury Laws Amendments (Business Registries Stabilisation and Uplift) Bill 2026 (Cth)

Further information

If you need advice on the application of Director IDs, or director’s duties more broadly, contact us for a confidential and obligation‑free discussion.

Doyles Recommended TMT Lawyer 2024


[1]  Treasury Laws Amendments (Business Registries Stabilisation and Uplift) Bill 2026 (Cth).

[2]  Treasury Laws Amendments (Business Registries Stabilisation and Uplift) Bill 2026 (Cth) s 206FA.

[3]  Explanatory Memorandum, Treasury Laws Amendment (Business Registries Stabilisation and Uplift) Bill 2026 (Cth) at Table 1.1.

[4]  Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Director Identification Numbers (Director IDs); Explanatory Memorandum, Treasury Laws Amendment (Business Registries Stabilisation and Uplift) Bill 2026 (Cth) at [1.4].

[5]  Treasury Laws Amendments (Business Registries Stabilisation and Uplift) Bill 2026 (Cth); Australian Securities and Investments  Commission, Director Identification Numbers (Director IDs).

[6]  Australian Business Registry Services, Director Identification Number.

[7]  Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Director Identification Numbers (Director IDs).


Related insights

  • What ASIC’s new DIN laws mean for Australian directors

    What ASIC’s new DIN laws mean for Australian directors

    The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has announced that, from 1 July 2027, obligations surrounding director identification numbers (Director IDs) will change.  The amendments to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) which are set to commence will require that companies provide Director IDs to ASIC.  This article will briefly explain the function of…

    Read more …

  • WIJOAV v Goldstone – shareholder oppression in a private equity context

    WIJOAV v Goldstone – shareholder oppression in a private equity context

    The recent case of WIJOAV Services Pty Ltd v Goldstone Private Equity Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 622 (WIJOAV v Goldstone) involved a claim of shareholder oppression under section 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act).  The case established that a shareholder in a private equity fund may be oppressed by a co-investor where…

    Read more …

  • Directors’ obligations to comply with Accounting Standards

    Directors’ obligations to comply with Accounting Standards

    Directors are personally liable for ensuring their company operates in accordance with corporate governance and accounting standards.  Obligations contained in part 2M.2 and 2M.3 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) outline obligations for companies to keep financial records and prepare annual financial and director’s reports.  Sections 180 and 344 of the Corporations Act…

    Read more …

  • Are fiduciary duties owed by former company directors?

    Are fiduciary duties owed by former company directors?

    A former director’s duties and responsibilities to their previous company may not end with their resignation. Find out how the Advanced Fuels Technology Pty Ltd v Blythe & Ors [2018] VSC 286 case explored this concept and what the Court had to say.

    Read more …

  • Insolvent trading – prison for former Kleenmaid director

    Insolvent trading – prison for former Kleenmaid director

    Former Kleenmaid director, Andrew Young, sentenced to nine years in prison for fraud, criminal insolvent trading and causing $330,000 to be withdrawn from company bank account. Learn more about Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)’s actions to ensure directors meet their obligations and the consequences of allowing companies to trade whilst insolvent.

    Read more …

  • Director Identification Numbers – more red tape?

    Director Identification Numbers – more red tape?

    Treasury Laws Amendment Bill proposes a Director Identification Number (DIN) regime to create transparency, detect illegal phoenix activity, and provide streamlined system for liquidators/administrators. Consultation closes 26 Oct 2018.

    Read more …

  • Restraint of trade clauses & commercial contracts

    Restraint of trade clauses & commercial contracts

    This article examines a Court decision that tested the enforceability of a 10-year restraint of trade clause in a commercial contract. Find out what the Court decided and the implications for the parties involved.

    Read more …

  • Director’s personal liability – misleading & deceptive conduct

    Director’s personal liability – misleading & deceptive conduct

    Directors: prevention is cheaper than cure! Explore ways to ensure your corporation doesn’t engage in misleading or deceptive conduct under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). Take active steps to protect yourself from personal liability.

    Read more …

  • Director loans – can they be recalled anytime?

    Director loans – can they be recalled anytime?

    This article explores the legal considerations of when loans between family members or directors of a company are due and payable on demand. Learn more about the relevant case law and express terms that may be implied by conduct.

    Read more …

Related cases

  • AEI Insurance Group Pty Ltd v Martin (No 4) [2024] FCA 1110

    Use up and down arrow keys to resize the meta box pane.

    EMPLOYMENT – alleged breaches of employment contract by respondent – alleged breaches of equitable duty of confidence, fiduciary duties and statutory obligations under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 182 and 183 – where respondent resigned his employment – where 45 clients moved from the applicant to the respondent’s new employer – whether the respondent breached…


Posted

in

, ,
Send this to a friend