Corporate law Brisbane

What ASIC’s new DIN laws mean for Australian directors

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–5 minutes

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has announced that, from 1 July 2027, obligations surrounding director identification numbers (Director IDs) will change.  The amendments to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) which are set to commence will require that companies provide Director IDs to ASIC.  This article will briefly explain the function of a Director ID and the changes that will apply to Australian businesses.

What is a Director ID?

A Director ID is a unique identifier containing fifteen (15) digits which is given to a company director or someone who intends to become a company director.  A Director ID will be a requirement where an individual is the director of:

  • an Australian company;
  • a registered Australian body;
  • a registered foreign company; or
  • an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation.

If a company has multiple directors, each director’s ID must be provided to ASIC.

What do the new changes entail?

Currently, each director must have a Director ID.  However, there is no requirement under the Corporations Act or any legislative instrument imposing that a director provide their Director ID to their company.  While a director must provide personal details, there is no need to give a specific identifier.

The Treasury Laws Amendments (Business Registries Stabilisation and Uplift) Bill 2026 (Cth) (Bill) will amend the Corporations Act.  Under section 205B of the Corporations Act, a director or alternate director will have to notify ASIC of their Director ID.[1]  The Bill also gives ASIC several powers, including the power to disqualify a person from managing corporations for up to three (3) years in the event of non-compliance.[2]

The changes can be summarised as follows:[3]

  • Each director must provide their Director ID to their company.
  • Companies and other registrable bodies must provide Director IDs to ASIC during standard reporting processes.
  • ASIC can publish Director ID information on its registers.
  • The Registrar has an express power to correct Director ID information.
  • ASIC can disqualify directors for not applying for a Director ID when directed by the Registrar.
  • A failure to comply with certain requirements of the Director ID regime may incur an infringement notice, issued by ASIC under Part 9.4AB of the Corporations Act.

The purpose of the new changes is to:

  • reduce the risk of fraud and identity misuse;
  • improve the accuracy of company records;
  • make it easier to identify company directors; and
  • improve the quality and usability of registry information“.[4]

Offences and penalties

The following offences and penalties will be introduced under the Bill:[5]

  • Section 1272C – failure to have a Director ID when required to do so – 60 penalty units
  • Section 1272D – failure to apply for a Director ID when directed by the Registrar – 60 penalty units
  • Section 1272G – applying for multiple Director IDs – 1 year imprisonment
  • Section 1272H – misrepresenting Director ID – 1 year imprisonment

Key considerations for businesses

It is a requirement that, before becoming a director, an individual applies for a Director ID.  Directors and businesses should remain aware of this requirement, noting that the Australian Business Registry Services (ABRS) is the body which issues and administers Director IDs.  Directors or prospective directors should apply for a Director ID through the ABRS website.[6]

ASIC recommends that businesses ensure company and director details are up to date by taking the following steps:[7]

  • checking that company details are up to date;
  • confirming all current directors are listed; and
  • updating any incorrect names, addresses, or contact details.

Links and further references

Legislation

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Treasury Laws Amendments (Business Registries Stabilisation and Uplift) Bill 2026 (Cth)

Further information

If you need advice on the application of Director IDs, or director’s duties more broadly, contact us for a confidential and obligation‑free discussion.

Doyles Recommended TMT Lawyer 2024


[1]  Treasury Laws Amendments (Business Registries Stabilisation and Uplift) Bill 2026 (Cth).

[2]  Treasury Laws Amendments (Business Registries Stabilisation and Uplift) Bill 2026 (Cth) s 206FA.

[3]  Explanatory Memorandum, Treasury Laws Amendment (Business Registries Stabilisation and Uplift) Bill 2026 (Cth) at Table 1.1.

[4]  Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Director Identification Numbers (Director IDs); Explanatory Memorandum, Treasury Laws Amendment (Business Registries Stabilisation and Uplift) Bill 2026 (Cth) at [1.4].

[5]  Treasury Laws Amendments (Business Registries Stabilisation and Uplift) Bill 2026 (Cth); Australian Securities and Investments  Commission, Director Identification Numbers (Director IDs).

[6]  Australian Business Registry Services, Director Identification Number.

[7]  Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Director Identification Numbers (Director IDs).


Related insights

  • Can a third party be held accountable for breaching director duties?

    Can a third party be held accountable for breaching director duties?

    This article examines how the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) holds third parties “knowingly involved” in director misconduct accountable. Learn more about the tests, cases, and damages that can result from company business gone wrong.

    Read more …

  • Holding company responsibility for subsidiary debts

    Holding company responsibility for subsidiary debts

    Uncover the factors that affect a holding company’s liability for its subsidiary’s debts. Learn when a holding company can be liable and what defences are available to protect it.

    Read more …

  • ASIC v Macdonald – have the lessons really been forgotten?

    ASIC v Macdonald – have the lessons really been forgotten?

    The case of Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 11) [2009] NSWSC 287 highlights the importance of properly documenting Directors’ meetings to ensure they are legally compliant. This article examines the facts of the case, the basis of The Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s argument, and the principles of preparing minutes of Directors’…

    Read more …

  • Shadow directors and de facto directors explained

    Shadow directors and de facto directors explained

    This article examines the legal reality of de facto directors and shadow directors, which go beyond those validly appointed. It also considers whether advisory board members can be classed as such, and the implications of this status, with reference to relevant case law.

    Read more …

  • Director’s duty to prevent insolvent trading

    Director’s duty to prevent insolvent trading

    This article provides an overview of directors’ duty to prevent insolvent trading under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), including the test for solvency, indicators of potential insolvency, and potential defences.

    Read more …

  • Directors’ Duties in Australia

    Directors’ Duties in Australia

    Directors of unlisted companies in Australia have a range of legal obligations to uphold. This article examines the duties of directors, as well as the potential penalties for breaching them. Discover more about the three sources of law that apply and how to ensure compliance.

    Read more …

Related cases

  • AEI Insurance Group Pty Ltd v Martin (No 4) [2024] FCA 1110

    Use up and down arrow keys to resize the meta box pane.

    EMPLOYMENT – alleged breaches of employment contract by respondent – alleged breaches of equitable duty of confidence, fiduciary duties and statutory obligations under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 182 and 183 – where respondent resigned his employment – where 45 clients moved from the applicant to the respondent’s new employer – whether the respondent breached…


Posted

in

, ,
Send this to a friend