Corporate law Brisbane

Is your ACN on all your public documents?

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

2–4 minutes
In Australia every company is issued with a unique, nine-digit number known as an Australian Company Number (ACN).  The ACN must appear on all public documents.  The purpose of the ACN is to ensure that companies are identified when conducting business transactions.1  On registration, new companies are issued with an ACN by the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC).2

Section 153 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) provides that a company must set out its name and ACN on all its public documents and negotiable instruments.

What is a public document?

Section 88A of the Act defines a public document as:

(a)       an instrument which is required by the Act, the Australian Securities & Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth), or any other Australian Law; or

(b)       an  instrument for the purposes of a particular transaction or dealing; or

(c)       a business letter, statement of account, invoice, receipt, order for goods, order for services or official notice of, or purporting to be signed or issued by or on behalf of, the body.

ASIC Regulatory Guide 13 provides that the items on which the ACN should appear include:

(a)     all documents required to be lodged with ASIC;

(b)       contracts and dealings where the company intends to be contractually bound;

(c)       business letterheads;

(d)       official company notices;

(e)       statements of account, including invoices;

(f)        orders for goods and services;

(g)       cheques, promissory notes and bills of exchange; and

(h)      receipts (which are not machine-produced);

(i)        written advertisements which make a specific offer that is capable of being accepted (such as an order form).

The following additional guidelines are provided by ASIC:

(a)       the ACN following the company’s name must be shown on the first page, if a company’s name appears on a document with two (2) or more pages;

(b)       the ACN should be clear, easy to read, and obvious as to the company to which it relates; and

(c)       the ACN should be identified by the words ‘Australian Company Number’, or by the abbreviations ‘ACN’ or ‘A.C.N.’ which is permitted by section 149 of the Act.

When is the ACN not required?

Section 88A(2) of the Act provides that a thing is not a public document of a body if it:

(a)       is applied, or to be applied:

(i)        to goods; or

(ii)        to a package, label, reel or thing in or with which goods are, or are to be, supplied; and

(b)       is so applied, or is intended or required to be so applied, for a purpose connected with the supply of the goods.

As described in Regulatory Guide 13, the items on which the ACN is not required include:

(a)       packaging and labelling, including envelopes and transport documents;

(b)       advertisements which do not make a specific offer which is capable of being accepted (such as advertisements which only promote the company and its goods or services in general);

(c)       machine-generated receipts;

(d)       business cards and ‘with compliments’ slips;

(e)       credit cards and credit card vouchers; and

(f)        items which are not documents.

What are the penalties for non-compliance?

The penalty for non-compliance is ten (10) penalty units ($1,100) or three months imprisonment, or both, pursuant to Schedule 3 Item 17 of the Act.[3]

Further information


Related insights about corporate law

  • Drag-along provisions challenged in Mobile Asset Case

    Drag-along provisions challenged in Mobile Asset Case

    The case of Mobile Asset Holdings Ltd [2026] ATP 7 (Mobile Asset Case) concerned a proposed special resolution to insert drag-along and tag-along rights into the company constitution of Mobile Asset Holdings Ltd ACN 614 791 043 (Mobile Asset).[1]  Ultimately, the Australian Takeovers Panel (Panel) decided that Mobile Asset could not hold a general meeting…

    Read more …

  • What ASIC’s new DIN laws mean for Australian directors

    What ASIC’s new DIN laws mean for Australian directors

    The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has announced that, from 1 July 2027, obligations surrounding director identification numbers (Director IDs) will change.  The amendments to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) which are set to commence will require that companies provide Director IDs to ASIC.  This article will briefly explain the function of…

    Read more …

  • WIJOAV v Goldstone – shareholder oppression in a private equity context

    WIJOAV v Goldstone – shareholder oppression in a private equity context

    The recent case of WIJOAV Services Pty Ltd v Goldstone Private Equity Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 622 (WIJOAV v Goldstone) involved a claim of shareholder oppression under section 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act).  The case established that a shareholder in a private equity fund may be oppressed by a co-investor where…

    Read more …

  • Federal Court dismisses continuous disclosure claim

    Federal Court dismisses continuous disclosure claim

    The Federal Court recently dismissed Australia Securities and Investment Commission’s (ASIC) claim in Australian Securities and Investment Commission v Nuix Limited [2026] FCA 490 (ASIC v Nuix) that Nuix Limited breached its obligations under section 674 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act).  Nuix Limited (Nuix) successfully contested ASIC’s allegation that it had breached…

    Read more …

  • Does your start-up meet the ESIC tax-offset criteria?

    Does your start-up meet the ESIC tax-offset criteria?

    Federal government introduced the Tax Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives for Innovation) Act 2016 (Cth) to provide tax incentives for investors in an eligible early stage innovation company (ESIC), including 20% up-front non-refundable tax offset and capital gains tax (CGT) exemption for all types of investors meeting criteria.

    Read more …

  • Valuing ESS Interests

    Valuing ESS Interests

    A company, whether listed or unlisted, can grant its employees an interest in its equity (ESS Interest), including through an employee share scheme (ESS) or employee share option plan (ESOP).  There are restrictions contained in both the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) and Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) (ITAA) that determine the price…

    Read more …

  • ESS vs ESOP – what’s the difference?

    ESS vs ESOP – what’s the difference?

    Employee share schemes (ESS) and employee share option plans (ESOP) are commonly used by corporations to incentivise employees and align performance with company growth by providing them with an interest in the company.  While the terms are often used interchangeably, they have distinct legal and structural differences under Australian law.  This article explains the key…

    Read more …

  • Disputed ESOP – Selak v National Tiles Co Pty Ltd

    Disputed ESOP – Selak v National Tiles Co Pty Ltd

    In the case of Selak v National Tiles, the Vic Supreme Court considered whether a company breached an option agreement governed by the terms of an Employee Share Option Plan (ESOP) by requiring an option holder to execute an undisclosed shareholders’ agreement as a condition of exercising vested options.  

    Read more …

  • Can a unit trust be wound up by the oppression remedies

    Can a unit trust be wound up by the oppression remedies

    The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corps Act) grants the Courts the power to award remedies under section 233, specifically designed to address situations of oppression within corporate entities under section 232.  These remedies, also known as the “Oppression Remedies”, aim to resolve situations where a company’s conduct unfairly prejudices its members or shareholders.  While primarily…

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend