technology lawyer

App developers – take care with Apple Developer License

HomePrivate: BlogLegal insightsApp developers – take care with Apple Developer License

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–5 minutes

Software Developers (Developers) who build iOS Applications (Apps) for use on Apple devices must adhere to strict requirements set by Apple.

There are a number of licences which provide for development and distribution of Apps, including:

  • the Apple Developer Agreement;
  • the Apple Developer Program Licence Agreement; and
  • the Apple Developer Enterprise Program Licence (ADEPL).

These licences can be viewed on the Apple website, (however you must first sign in using an Apple ID).

App Store Review Guidelines

Apple exercises a high degree of control over the development of Apps for its iOS platform (which operates on Apple iPhones, iPads, and other mobile devices).  The App Store Review Guidelines (ASRG) contain a prescriptive list of requirements, written in plain English, which must be met before Apple will allow an App to be submitted to its “App Store“.

Unless an iOS device has been ‘jailbroken’, the device will only run applications which have been digitally signed by software developers authorised by Apple.  Therefore, before an App can be distributed via Apple’s App Store or “B2B Store”, the applications must be submitted to Apple for review and approval.  Apple will reject any Apps that they consider, amongst other things:

  • to be unreliable;
  • does not perform as expected; or
  • to contain offensive material.

Some have questioned whether there is a way to circumnavigate the review and approval process by developing Apps under the Apple Developer Enterprise Program Licence (ADEPL). The consequences of this are discussed below.

Apple Developer Enterprise Program License

The ADEPL is a program designed to allow organisations to develop and deploy custom iOS applications for use solely within their own organisation.  Apps distributed using the ADEPL are not required to be submitted to Apple for review and approval before distribution, which has raised questions about whether this licence can be utilised to distribute Apps without Apple’s scrutiny.

Unfortunately, Apps distributed under the ADEPL are limited by the terms of the ADEPL to be used only within the organisation for which it is developed.  In other words, the ADEPL cannot be used to commercially distribute iOS applications to the public.  This conclusion is partially based on the following provisions found in the ADEPL agreement:

  • “Internal Use Application” means a program “… that is developed by You on a custom basis for Your own business purposes … solely for internal use by Your Employees or Permitted Users, or as otherwise expressly permitted …” and which specifically excludes “any programs or applications that may be used, distributed, or otherwise made available to other companies …”
  • the “Purpose” preamble states: “If You want to distribute applications for iOS, watchOS or tvOS to third parties or obtain an application from a third party, then You must use the App Store or B2B Program for distribution.”
  • Clause 7 of the ADEPL also prohibits the distribution of applications developed using the Apple Software, except as permitted by the ADEPL.

Consequences of breaching the ADEPL

If Apple became aware that a user was commercially distributing iOS applications in breach of the ADEPL, it may terminate the agreement with the Developer for breaching its terms.  Apple could also revoke any digital certificates that were used to sign an application for distribution.  Either way there are significant adverse consequences for the Developer and their client.

Therefore if a Developer wishes to distribute an application for commercial purposes, distribution via the App or B2B Store, in compliance with Apple’s term and conditions, would be the safest course of action.

What does this mean for Developers?

In combination, the stringent controls Apple exercises over the App and B2B store, coupled with the limited availability of the ADEPL, result in a strictly controlled platform for all budding Developers looking to distribute their Apps on iOS devices.

There is no way distribute iOS applications without first having them approved by Apple.  Therefore, it is imperative that Developers understand the rights and obligations that arise from any agreement with Apple and the consequences of violating such agreements.

Further information about software development law

If you require further information about whether your App complies with the Apple Developer Program Licence or you require a bespoke EULA that complies with Apple’s requirements, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about software development law

  • Parliament passes Government surveillance bill

    Parliament passes Government surveillance bill

    The Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Bill 2021 added three (3) warrants, allowing law enforcement to access data and take control of online accounts to obtain evidence of serious online crime.

    Read more …

  • Data breach compliance and response plans

    Data breach compliance and response plans

    Dundas Lawyers create tailored data breach response plans to ensure compliance with the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). Plans include actions, registers, records, tests and tasks. Get an obligation-free and confidential discussion to learn more.

    Read more …

  • Are email trackers admissible as evidence?

    Are email trackers admissible as evidence?

    The Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) is silent, but the Court considers email trackers and read receipts as evidence in civil and intellectual property litigation. As seen in Jaffari v Grabowski [2013] NSWCA 114, sender’s receipt of confirmation of email relay is a matter for the recipient.

    Read more …

  • Is AI recognized as an inventor under the Patents Act 1990?

    Is AI recognized as an inventor under the Patents Act 1990?

    The ruling of Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 has opened the door for artificial intelligence-created inventions to be eligible for patent protection. Learn more about the implications of this groundbreaking decision.

    Read more …

  • Software royalties and income tax – explained

    Software royalties and income tax – explained

    Discover how the Australian Taxation Office (ATO)’s draft Taxation Ruling 2021/D4 could affect your business. Learn more about the expanded scope of what is considered a royalty for income tax purposes and the potential tax implications.

    Read more …

  • The Australian Cyber Law Map – overview

    The Australian Cyber Law Map – overview

    The Australian Cyber Law Map provides clarity on ever-changing legal landscape, covering commercial enterprises, cyber offences, infrastructure, international law, national security and personal rights. A source for understanding laws and providing safety/security in the digital age.

    Read more …

  • Explaining Australia’s Media Bargaining Code

    Explaining Australia’s Media Bargaining Code

    The News Media Bargaining Code (NMBC) is quickly moving through Parliament and looks likely to become law. It requires digital platforms, such as Facebook and Google, to negotiate remuneration with News Companies for providing their media services. Non-compliance could result in hefty civil penalties.

    Read more …

  • Warning – Facebook trolls ordered to pay $150k damages

    Warning – Facebook trolls ordered to pay $150k damages

    An online defamation case has resulted in two trolls being ordered to pay a hefty sum in damages. Learn more about the case and the potential consequences of making false claims online.

    Read more …

  • My client poached my software developers – what can I do?

    My client poached my software developers – what can I do?

    This article examines how professional service businesses can protect their investment in employees from clients poaching them. It looks at potential clauses such as client agreements, non-solicitation of employees, restraints of trade, confidential information, copyright and more.

    Read more …

Send this to a friend