technology lawyer

Custom end user licence agreements for the iStore

HomePrivate: BlogTechnology lawSoftware development lawCustom end user licence agreements for the iStore

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

When Software Developers (Developers) or their clients launch a new application (App) in the iStore, the default terms and conditions are Apple’s standard End User Licence Agreement (EULA).  However, a number of situations arise where it may be in the best interests of the owner of the App to provide their own EULA in place of the default one.  

Why would you need to deviate from the standard EULA?

Apple’s EULA deals with most of the usual licensing issues, however it may not align perfectly with Australian law.  For example, regardless of the customer (End User) agreeing to the jurisdiction of the Courts of California and the law of the United States, various terms will apply including the statutory guarantees as provided in schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth).  Further to this, because of the evolution of the case law in the area of unfair contract terms, it’s possible that some of the terms and conditions in the default EULA will become “unfair” and unenforceable by default.

Apple requirements for bespoke EULA’s

Prior to inclusion of the App in the iStore, Apple has provided a guide for Developers who intend to supply their own EULA with an App.  In short, the guide describes the minimum requirements which the bespoke EULA must meet:

  • the EULA should acknowledge that parties to the agreement are the Developer and the End User and not Apple;
  • the Developer is solely responsible for the App;
  • the EULA must not conflict (be less restrictive) that the terms and conditions of the iStore;
  • the scope fo the EULA is to be limited to a non-transferrable licence to use the App on the device which it is downloaded;
  • the Developer is solely responsible for support;
  • the parties must acknowledge that Apple is not responsible for supporting the App;
  • the Developer must be responsible for product warranties;
  • should the App fail, Apple will refund the purchase price of the App and thereafter Apple will have no further responsibility;
  • the EULA must not attempt to limit the Developers liability over and what is allowable under statute;
  • in the event of any claimed intellectual property infringement, the Developer must be responsible for investigating the defending the matter and not Apple;
  • the Developer must warrant that they are outside of the United States and in particular that they are not in a country which is “embargoed by the United States” or is deemed to be a “terrorist supporting country”;
  • the contact details of the Developer and customer service information in the event that the end user needs to contact the developer;
  • the EULA must provide that the Apple is a third party beneficiary to the EULA and agree that Apple and any of its subsidiaries may enforce the terms of against any end user.

In short, there is quite a few issues to consider when drafting bespoke EULA’s to comply with Apple’s requirements.  The complete guide is available  on the Apple website.

Ensuring that the terms and conditions are legally binding

The usual rules of bringing the EULA to the attention of end users apply in this instance.  The Developer must do all that is reasonably possible to bring the EULA to the attention of the end user.  See our article: “Are your website terms and conditions binding?”

Further information

If you would like to discuss having a lawyer draft a bespoke EULA that complies with the rules for the iStore, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about technology law

  • The Digital ID Bill 2023 (Cth) – key points

    The Digital ID Bill 2023 (Cth) – key points

    On 30 November 2023, the Digital ID Bill 2023 (Cth) and the Digital ID (Transitional and Consequential Provisions) Bill 2023 (Digital ID Bills) were introduced in the Australian Senate.  Digital IDs are designed to provide individuals with a convenient way to verify their identity when completing certain online transactions and dealing with government and certain…

    Read more …

  • What are adequate cybersecurity measures?

    What are adequate cybersecurity measures?

    The adequacy of cyber security measures was considered in the case of Australian Securities and Investments Commission v RI Advice Group Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 496 (ASIC v Ri Advice Group).  One of the issues raised was whether the respondent had adequate cyber security and cyber resilience in place across its network of financial advisors. …

    Read more …

  • National Classification Scheme – proposed federal changes

    National Classification Scheme – proposed federal changes

    Albanese Government announces intention to reform National Classification Scheme, proposing R18+ for games simulating gambling and M for computer games with paid loot boxes/in-game purchases linked to chance. Learn more about proposed reforms and if simulated gambling needs to be addressed.

    Read more …

  • Digital Platform Services Inquiry – submissions sought

    Digital Platform Services Inquiry – submissions sought

    The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is investigating the activities of digital platform service providers and their impact on competition, consumerism, and business. Have your say and make a submission by 5 April 2023. Learn more in the seventh report of the Digital Platform Services Inquiry.

    Read more …

  • Australian legislation tackles loot boxes in video games

    Australian legislation tackles loot boxes in video games

    The Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Amendment (Loot Boxes) Bill 2022 (Bill)  has been tabled in the House of Representatives on the 28 November 2022.  The private member’s Bill acts in response to growing support for the regulation of features and elements within video games which appear to simulate gambling.

    Read more …

  • Influencers now regulated when promoting therapeutic goods

    Influencers now regulated when promoting therapeutic goods

    The Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code 2021 (Cth) (2021 TGA Code) brings regulations for social media endorsements of therapeutic goods. Learn more about the changes and how to ensure compliance before they take effect on 1 January 2022.

    Read more …

  • Implied terms in software contracts – part two

    Implied terms in software contracts – part two

    This article examines the concept of implied terms in software contracts, including the requirements for implying a term, the process of determining implied terms, and examples of implied terms applied in software agreements.

    Read more …

  • Australian Court: AI can’t be “inventor” in Australian patent

    Australian Court: AI can’t be “inventor” in Australian patent

    The Federal Court of Australia has made a groundbreaking ruling on the patentability of works created by Artificial Intelligence. Explore the implications of this decision and what it could mean for the future of patent law.

    Read more …

  • Introduction of cryptocurrency and hacking offences to Parliament

    Introduction of cryptocurrency and hacking offences to Parliament

    The Crimes Legislation Amendment (Ransomware Action Plan) Bill 2022 is set to revolutionize the way cybercrime is prosecuted. Learn more about the changes it brings and the implications they have.

    Read more …

Send this to a friend