media enquiries

National Classification Scheme – proposed federal reforms

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

On 29 March 2023, the Albanese Government announced its intention to reform the National Classification Scheme (Scheme).  While computer and online games often seem harmless and fun, the proposed reforms are aimed to address concerns that computer and online games simulating gambling-like content are not effectively regulated.

What is the National Classification Scheme?

Created by the Intergovernmental Agreement on Censorship, the Scheme monitors which films, computer games, and certain publications are displayed, demonstrated, sold, hired, advertised, or publicly exhibited, ensuring they are classified accordingly.  All Australian states and territories partner with the Commonwealth in this Scheme.

Classification decisions are made by the Classification Board (Board) by assessing content and applying the provisions of the National Classification Code.  Here, the Board decides on the rating of each film, game, or publication.

The Scheme guides state and territory governments in enforcing laws and outlines potential offences and penalties for any breaches.

What are the proposed reforms to the Scheme?

In a modern digital landscape, the potential exposure of young people to gambling-like experiences is far more prevalent than that of previous generations.  Unlike today, exposure to commercial gambling required practices, such as travelling to a traditional land-based venue, compliance with dress codes for the venue and providing age-related identification for entrance into the venue.

Therefore, the proposed reforms announced by the Albanese Government are in relation to the following changes:

  • a new mandatory minimum classification of R 18+ (restricted to 18 years and over) for games that simulate gambling-like content;
  • a new mandatory minimum classification of M (not recommended for individuals under 15 years of age) for computer games that contain paid loot boxes or other in-game purchases linked to chance; and
  • new definitions for terms contained in the proposed reforms, such as ‘in-game purchases linked to elements of chance’, ‘loot box’, ‘real-world currency’, and ‘simulated gambling’.

Is there a need for reform of the Scheme?

A media release from the Albanese Government alongside the release of the Stevens Review outline the objectives underlying classification reform.  The Stevens Review states:

There is a need for a future classification regulatory framework that:

  • Is able to adapt to new technologies, market developments and emerging issues of community concern.
  • Provides clear, useful and easily accessible information to enable consumers to make informed media choices for themselves and for their children.
  • Has evidence-based classification guidelines that are regularly updated taking into regard both expert knowledge and Australian community standards.
  • Enables classification arrangements that are efficient and cost-effective for industry, that are consistent across content platforms and which have the confidence of the community.
  • Enables timely decision-making on changes to the classification scheme”.

In addition, a review conducted by the Australian Gambling Research Centre found evidence of:

  • Loot box engagement, including viewing, opening, and especially purchasing, is associated with problem gambling and internet gaming disorder.
  • Simulated gambling engagement, especially in-game purchases in social casino games, is associated with problem gambling.
  • Other in-game purchases (not including expenditure on loot boxes or in simulated gambling games) are associated with problem gambling.

How do computer games simulate gambling?

Interactive features within games that resemble gambling activities are referred to as ‘simulated gambling’.  These computer games can imitate various core features of commercial gambling, such as the look, sound and activities, however, do not grant players with the opportunity to lose or win real currency.

According to the Stevens Review, there are two distinct types of games that involve simulated gambling:

  • ‘Social casino’ games are simple app games which simulate real-world casino games.
    Simulated gambling is the entire focus of these games.
  • Other games that have a broader storyline occasionally also contain simulated gambling as a minor feature.

Simulated gambling is considered by the Board under the category of ‘Themes  but is not specifically addressed in the current Guidelines for the Classification of Computer Games.

What exactly is a “loot box”?

A loot box (Loot Box) is a consumable virtual item or prize that requires real currency to be paid, or alternatively be obtained for free via gameplay.  Loot Boxes award players with modifications or functional items, such as weapons or cosmetic items, that can be used to enhance a gaming experience.  The items players receive from Loot Boxes are often random or chance-based.

The proposed reforms come as a result of concerns that Loot Boxes do not currently fall within the definition of a “Gambling Services” under the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth).

For more information on Loot Boxes, see Dundas Lawyers’ article on Australian legislation proposed to address loot boxes in video games.

Links and further references

Further information on the proposed reforms to the Scheme

Media release announcing the reforms – Albanese Government

Review of Australian classification regulation (the Stevens Review)

Legislation

Guidelines for the Classification of Computer games 2012

Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth)

Intergovernmental Agreement on Censorship

National Classification Code

National Classification Scheme

Further information about the National Classification Scheme

If your business needs advice on how the potential changes to the National Classification Scheme will affect you, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:

Doyles Recommended TMT Lawyer 2024

Related insights about the National Classification Scheme

  • Federal parliament passes cyber security laws

    Federal parliament passes cyber security laws

    On 25 November 2024, the Australian Parliament passed a suite of legislation, collectively referred to by the Australian Government as the Cyber Security Legislative Package 2024.  The purported impetus for this legislation was a series of high-profile data breaches in 2022 and 2023.

    Read more …

  • Domain name disputes – a summary of the process

    Domain name disputes – a summary of the process

    A domain name is a string of text that maps to an alphanumeric IP address, enabling users to access websites through client-side software.[1]  Domains can be valuable business assets, and they frequently become the subject of disputes regarding the legitimacy of their registration among organisations with competing rights.

    Read more …

  • New OAIC guidance on Artificial Intelligence

    New OAIC guidance on Artificial Intelligence

    On 21 October 2024, the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) published two (2) new guides on artificial intelligence (AI), purportedly in effort to make privacy compliance easier for business.

    Read more …

  • Artificial Intelligence defined – why no uniform approach?

    Artificial Intelligence defined – why no uniform approach?

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) is commonly thought of as the capacity of computer systems to execute tasks that usually need human intelligence, such as learning, reasoning, and making decisions.[1]  It covers a range of specialised fields, each focusing on different functions.  For example, machine learning allows computers to learn from data, computer vision enables them to…

    Read more …

  • New USPTO guidelines on AI assisted inventions

    New USPTO guidelines on AI assisted inventions

    In response to the Biden administration’s Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence on 30 October 2023, which outlined policies and principles to promote responsible Artificial Intelligence innovation and competition, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued inventorship guidance for artificial intelligence (AI) assisted inventions.  These…

    Read more …

  • Software developer obtains Court order – names behind IP addresses

    Software developer obtains Court order – names behind IP addresses

    Justice Burley of the Federal Court of Australia in the case of Siemens Industry Software Inc v Telstra Corporation Limited [2020] FCA 901 ordered that Telstra, within fourteen (14) days, provide to Siemens all documents in its control relating to the identity of certain Telstra Account holders.  Those account holders were suspected by Siemens of…

    Read more …

  • The Digital ID Bill 2023 (Cth)

    The Digital ID Bill 2023 (Cth)

    On 30 November 2023, the Digital ID Bill 2023 (Cth) and the Digital ID (Transitional and Consequential Provisions) Bill 2023 (Digital ID Bills) were introduced in the Australian Senate.  Digital IDs are designed to provide individuals with a convenient way to verify their identity when completing certain online transactions and dealing with government and certain…

    Read more …

  • Misinformation and Disinformation Bill 2023 – exposure draft

    Misinformation and Disinformation Bill 2023 – exposure draft

    The Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2023 (Cth) (Misinformation Bill) was announced by the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communication and the Arts (DITRDCA) in January 2023.  The Misinformation Bill is aimed at restricting the flow of misinformation and disinformation by providing the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) with increased…

    Read more …

  • What are adequate cyber security measures?

    What are adequate cyber security measures?

    The adequacy of cyber security measures was considered in the case of Australian Securities and Investments Commission v RI Advice Group Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 496 (ASIC v Ri Advice Group).  One of the issues raised was whether the respondent had adequate cyber security and cyber resilience in place across its network of financial advisors. …

    Read more …


Posted

in

, ,
Send this to a friend