employment law

Employment changes may trigger a constructive dismissal claim

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawEmployment law for employersEmployment changes may trigger a constructive dismissal claim

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Employers need to take care when making changes to an employee’s contract of employment as it may give rise to allegations of constructive dismissal.

Section 386(1)(b) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) provides that a person has been dismissed if they were forced to resign from their employment because of conduct, or a course of conduct, by their employer. This is commonly known as constructive dismissal.

The Act reflects the common law concept of constructive dismissal, allowing for a finding that an employee was dismissed in situations where:

  • The employer expressly asks the employee to resign or face a threatened or impending dismissal, or;
  • The employer’s conduct may leave the employee feeling that he or she has no reasonable choice but to resign.

View on Dundas Lawyers Youtube Channel – Constructive Dismissal

Examples of conduct which could give rise to constructive dismissal

Importantly the definition of “conduct” includes both an act and a failure to act.  Unacceptable conduct of the employer may be an unauthorised variation to employment conditions, such as:

  • Repeated failure to pay wages;
  • A pay-cut;
  • Demotion;
  • Change of working hours;
  • Relocation; or
  • Reducing the responsibilities and duties of an employee who returned from maternity leave.

It may also be unacceptable personal treatment of the employee such as:

  • Harassment by a fellow worker that the employer has unreasonably failed to prevent or punish; or
  • Continued failure to investigate allegations of bullying or to take appropriate steps to protect the employee from the bullying.

Not a separate legal claim

Constructive dismissal is not a separate claim, but is an argument put as part of an unfair dismissal or a general protections (adverse action) claim.

In lodging a claim, an employee must prove on the balance of probabilities that he or she did not leave their employment voluntarily but rather was forced to leave because of the employer’s conduct.

It is a high threshold to prove the employer’s conduct fundamentally damaged the employment relationship to the extent that what the employer did, or failed to do, left the employee with no other option but to resign.

Importantly, the employer’s conduct must involve a significant breach of the employment contract and must be the principal contributing factor leading to the employee’s resignation.

In summary, constructive dismissal cases are rarely straight-forward with each case assessed on its own facts. It is recommended that employers and employees alike seek legal advice whether submitting or defending a claim.

Links and further references

Cases

Australian Hearing v Peary (2009) 185 IR 359

Hobbs v Achilleus Taxation Pty Ltd ATF the Achilleus Taxation Trust; Achilleus Accounting Pty Ltd ATF the Achilleus Accounting Trust [2012] FWA 2907

O’Meara v Stanley Works Pty Ltd [2006] AIRCFB PR973462 (11 August 2006)

Doumit v ABB Engineering Construction Pty Ltd (unreported, AIRCFB, Munro J, Duncan DP, Merriman C, 9 December 1996) Print N6999 12

Mohazbad v Dick Smith Electronics [1995] IRCA 272

Legislation

Fair Work Act 2009

Further information

If you are an employer or a senior executive and need any assistance regarding a constructive dismissal claim, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about employment law for employers

  • Cost awards in unfair dismissal cases – part 3

    Cost awards in unfair dismissal cases – part 3

    This article looks at when costs orders can be imposed on a party to an unfair dismissal application, with an example of how costs orders can be imposed on a complainant employee.

    Read more …

  • Cost awards in unfair dismissal cases – part 2

    Cost awards in unfair dismissal cases – part 2

    The case of Clair Petersen v Kizuri Capital Pty Ltd, Maycorp Pty Ltd and Cricklewood Capital Pty Ltd T/A Allpet Products [2021] FWC 526 highlights the importance of parties engaging meaningfully and reasonably throughout the unfair dismissal process. A costs order was made against an employer who ignored settlement offers, demonstrating that such behaviour can…

    Read more …

  • Changes for casual employment – employer’s responsibilites

    Changes for casual employment – employer’s responsibilites

    The Fair Work Amendment Act 2021 (Cth) has changed the landscape of employment for casual employees. Employers need to be aware of the amended definition of casual employees, the “casual conversion” option and the requirement to provide a Casual Employment Information Statement (CEIS).

    Read more …

  • Who is an “officer” in business dealings?

    Who is an “officer” in business dealings?

    The High Court’s decision in Deputy Commissioner v Huang [2021] HCA 43 confirms the Federal Court may make worldwide asset freezing orders. This is an important development in Australian law.

    Read more …

  • Standing down employees – when can it be done?

    Standing down employees – when can it be done?

    This article provides an overview of the legal framework around standing down employees without pay. It examines the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and relevant case law, and emphasises the importance of consulting with employees and exploring alternative arrangements.

    Read more …

  • New Fair Work information statement

    New Fair Work information statement

    In December 2019, the Fair Work Ombudsman updated the Fair Work Information Statement (FWIS).  The new FWIS sets out information for businesses about the conditions of employment for new employees.  Businesses must issue a copy of the FWIS to all new employees before, or as soon as possible after, they commence employment.  This article discusses…

    Read more …

  • Know-how vs confidential information

    Know-how vs confidential information

    Understand the difference between “know-how” and confidential information when it comes to employer-employee relationships. Find out how to protect confidential trade secrets and use broad contractual terms to ensure protection. Click through to get the full details.

    Read more …

  • The doctrine of repudiation – when deals go bad

    The doctrine of repudiation – when deals go bad

    Contracting in business can be tricky, but the doctrine of repudiation may provide a way to end a contract and seek compensation. Learn more about this complex topic.

    Read more …

  • Bullying in the workplace by a body corporate

    Bullying in the workplace by a body corporate

    This investigation reveals the legal implications of workplace bullying in a body corporate. Find out what the Obligations of Reasonableness and the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) mean for workers and how to apply for an order to stop the bullying.

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend