- Copyright;
- Trademarks;
- Registered Designs;
- Patents;
- Circuit layout rights;
- Plant breeders rights;
- Confidential information; and
- Trade secrets.
What are the options for commercialisation of IP?
Commercialisation can take many forms depending on what the IP needs to maximise returns for its owners. At its heart is the attempt to maximise the commercial value by converting the IP into a saleable product or service for the benefits of its owners. Generally this involves collaborating with some third party that adds value to the IP and separating the trading entity from the owner of the IP.
- IP Licensing;
- IP Sale (Assignment) and subsequent Licensing;
- Entering into a Joint Venture;
- Mergers and acquisitions; and
- Spin out entity.
Licensing
A license is in essence a right to use, therefore, the terms of licence agreements can be diverse. See our article on Licensing Agreements.
Commercialisation is not an exact science. What one person believes is the best way to exploit the inherent value in any particular IP will vary from another persons. Like all things in business there will be competing opinions which all need to be considered.
Further information
Dundas Lawyers is involved in the legal aspects of commercialisation and advises on the law in this area. For further information on how Dundas Lawyers can assist your company with any of its commercialisation needs, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.
Related insights about IP commercialisation
-
Electronic document execution by directors
The Federal Government has issued a ruling allowing companies to sign documents electronically until 6 November 2020. Find out more about how this ruling affects your business.
-
Assigning intellectual property and the right to sue
This case examines Re Taypar Pty Ltd v Benko Santic [1989] FCA 543, which determined that an assignee of intellectual property rights cannot sue for pre-assignment infringements, unless the assignment explicitly assigns a right to do so.
-
Evidence from the Wayback Machine accepted
Australian Courts are increasingly considering the use of evidence from the Wayback Machine, but questions remain as to whether they will accept such reports in practice and what will be allowed?
-
$750k awarded for fake online reviews
The Supreme Court of South Australia awarded $A750,000 in damages to a lawyer in the case of Cheng v Lok [2020] SASC 14, demonstrating the serious consequences of posting fake reviews online. Find out more about the implications of this case and alternative legal actions for companies that receive negative reviews.
-
Adaptations and computer code – copyright issues
An adaption in copyright is the exclusive right of the owner of the work in question. Section 10 of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Act) defines adaption as it relates to literary works in dramatic and non-dramatic forms, in a computer program and in relation to a musical work. The rights that apply to adaptions…
-
Computer code libraries and copyright ownership
The Australian case of Redrock Holdings Pty Ltd and Hotline Communications Ltd v Hinkley [2001] VSC 91 has shed light on how the ownership of copyright in code libraries is determined. Learn more about the dispute and its implications for copyright ownership in this blog post.
