Commercialisation is a term that is much touted in entrepreneurial circles – although it’s not quite as popular as the term “Investor ready“! It is often titled “New Venture Development”. It stems from the creation of intellectual property (IP) that enables the owner to protect the work to exploit its commercial value.
IP Australia defines Intellectual property (IP) as “the property of your mind or intellect”. It can be an invention, trade mark, original design or the practical application of a good idea”. IP can manifest itself in the following ways:
Copyright;
Trademarks;
Registered Designs;
Patents;
Circuit layout rights;
Plant breeders rights;
Confidential information; and
Trade secrets.
What are the options for commercialisation of IP?
Commercialisation can take many forms depending on what the IP needs to maximise returns for its owners. At its heart is the attempt to maximise the commercial value by converting the IP into a saleable product or service for the benefits of its owners. Generally this involves collaborating with some third party that adds value to the IP and separating the trading entity from the owner of the IP.
The main vehicles for commercialising intellectual property include:
IP Licensing;
IP Sale (Assignment) and subsequent Licensing;
Entering into a Joint Venture;
Mergers and acquisitions; and
Spin out entity.
In all of these cases, there are a minimum of two parties, the IP owner and the party that adds value to the IP by having a market for or having access to a market that will assist to realise the value in the IP.
Licensing
A license is in essence a right to use, therefore, the terms of licence agreements can be diverse. See our article on Licensing Agreements.
Commercialisation is not an exact science. What one person believes is the best way to exploit the inherent value in any particular IP will vary from another persons. Like all things in business there will be competing opinions which all need to be considered.
Further information
Dundas Lawyers is involved in the legal aspects of commercialisation and advises on the law in this area. For further information on how Dundas Lawyers can assist your company with any of its commercialisation needs, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS. Legal Practice Director T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred) M: +61 419 726 535 E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.
On 8 October 2025, the Federal Court published the judgement of Justice Halley in the case of Australian Information Commissioner v Australian Clinical Labs Limited (No 2) [2025] FCA 1224 (AIC v ACL). Australian Clinical Labs Limited (ACL) was ordered to pay $5.8 million in civil penalties in relation to a 2022 data breach. This…
On 22 October 2025, Malcolm Burrows appeared live on Katherine Feeney’s ABC Radio program, “Legal Eagles” as the Technology and Intellectual Property Lawyer to discuss legal issues associated with artificial intelligence and the justice system.
On 10 September 2025, Malcolm Burrows appeared live on Katherine Feeney’s ABC Radio program, “Legal Eagles” as the Technology and Intellectual Property Lawyer to discuss legal issues associated with copyright subsisting in artificial intelligence (AI) training data.
On 31 August 2025, the Australian Government published the Final Report (Report) on the Age Assurance Technology Trial (Trial). Conducted by the independent Age Check Certification Scheme (ACCS), the Trial offers insights into the technical feasibility, privacy implications, and operational deployment capabilities of various age assurance technologies. While the Report explicitly states it is neutral…
On 9 September 2025, the eSafety Commissioner, Mrs Julie Inman Grant (Commissioner), registered six (6) new codes (New Codes) under the Online Safety Act 2021(Cth) (Online Safety Act) aimed at protecting children from the “clear and present” dangers of harmful AI chatbots and other online adult content. On 9 March 2026, these New Codes will…
Several authors commenced class action lawsuit against Claude AI (Anthropic) in the San Francisco District Court. The authors allege Anthropic infringed their copyright by using millions of pirated and purchased books to train its artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot, Claude AI. Anthropic has agreed to settle the class action approximately $1.5 billion US dollars, avoiding further…