As of 21 March 2021, the Corporations (Coronavirus Economic Response) Determination (No 3) 2020 (Cth) (Determination) lapsed because it reached the end of its six (6) month period as prescribed by section 9(3) of the Determination. This means that the ability for companies to execute documents electronically, or e-signing, is no longer acceptable under subsection 127(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act). Section 6(3)-(4) of the Determination authorised e-signing in response to the COVID-19 restrictions, as stated in the Explanatory Statement:
“…in this uncertain time when public health and travel restrictions and postal delays remain in place. This gives certainty that when company officers sign a document electronically (including an electronic document), the document has been validly executed.”
The Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021 (Cth) (Bill) intends to extend e-signing until 16 September 2021.[1] However, the Bill has been adjourned by the Senate until 11 May 2021.[2] As there are no other regulatory reliefs or permanent legislation in place, companies are required to return to pre-COVID conditions when executing documents. This means signatories are required to sign the same ‘static’ document.[3] The signatories must be either:
- two (2) directors of the company;
- one (1) director and one (1) secretary of the company; or
- the sole director for a proprietary company when they are also the secretary.[4]
Takeaways
Companies can no longer execute documents by e-signing. They should return to the framework for document execution provided under section 127(1) of the Act.
Links and further references
Legislation
Commonwealth, Parliamentary Debates, Senate, 18 March 2021, 99 (Amanda Stroker, Assistant Minister to the Attorney-General)
Corporations (Coronavirus Economic Response) Determination (No. 3) 2020 (Cth) Explanatory Statement
Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021 (Cth) Explanatory Memorandum
Corporations (Coronavirus Economic Response) Determination (No 3) 2020 (Cth)
Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021 (Cth)
Cases
Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited v Pickard [2019] SASC 123
Further information about directors duties
If you need advice on your obligations as the officer of a company, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.
[1] See Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021 (Cth) sch 1; see also Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021 (Cth) Explanatory Memorandum, 3.
[2] See Commonwealth, Parliamentary Debates, Senate, 18 March 2021, 99 (Amanda Stroker, Assistant Minister to the Attorney-General).
[3] See Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited v Pickard [2019] SASC 123, [70].
[4] Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 127(1).
Related insights about directors duties
-
The illegal phoenixing regime
The Treasury Laws Amendment (Combating Illegal Phoenixing) Act 2020 (Cth) (Amending Act) came into force on 18 February 2020 and was designed to prevent illegal phoenixing activity. The Amending Act introduced reforms such as creditor-defeating disposition provisions to combat phoenixing activity. Additional provisions amending the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) were aimed to encourage accountability by…
-
Unfair contract terms – automatic renewal clauses explained
9 November 2023 was a crucial date for Australian businesses because from that date significant penalties can now be imposed on businesses found to have unfair contract terms (UCT) in their contracts. The Federal Government had introduced significant changes to laws relating to UCT on 10 November 2022.
-
Australian legislation tackles loot boxes in video games
The Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Amendment (Loot Boxes) Bill 2022 (Bill) has been tabled in the House of Representatives on the 28 November 2022. The private member’s Bill acts in response to growing support for the regulation of features and elements within video games which appear to simulate gambling.
-
Consumer law updates business owners should know
The Treasury Laws Amendment (More Competition, Better Prices) Act 2022 (Cth) (Act) amends various pieces of legislation to provide stronger competition and consumer protections. In particular, the Act bolsters the penalties applicable for offences relating to unfair practices and unfair contract terms under as contained within the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA) and…
-
Is a proposed settlement fair and reasonable in the Federal Court?
Class action lawsuits commonly resolve in a settlement between the members of a class and the respondents to a claim. However, there are strict requirements to proposed settlements, including that they are ‘fair and reasonable’, which will be subject to judicial oversight.
-
Incentivising distributors – key contractual considerations
Incentivising distributors is an effective way to increase sales, reduce inventory and accelerate adoption of new products. This article explores various methods, from incentive programs to vacations and gamification, plus advice on measuring performance and accountability.
-
Federal Court class actions – requirements explained
This article provides an overview of the mechanics behind a Class Action in the Federal Court of Australia. It covers the requirements to commence the action, the ability for members to opt out, and the limits on Class Actions, giving readers a comprehensive understanding of the process and obligations.
-
Registration of .au domain names – what does this mean for businesses?
From 24 March 2022, any persons with a verified connection to Australia will be able to apply for a domain name ending in .au, also known as a direct name or second level name (Direct Name). Any business can apply for a Direct Name as long as they meet the eligibility criteria under the .au…
-
Use of a competitors trade marks for comparative advertising
Comparative advertising can be a powerful tool, but it must be done within the bounds of the law. Learn more about the legal implications of comparative advertising in Australia, including the case of GlaxoSmithKline Australia Pty Ltd v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 1.
