commercial-law

Consumer law changes – what business owners need to know

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

The Treasury Laws Amendment (More Competition, Better Prices) Act 2022 (Cth) (Act) amends various pieces of legislation to provide stronger competition and consumer protections.  In particular, the Act bolsters the penalties applicable for offences relating to unfair practices and unfair contract terms under as contained within the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA) and the Australian Consumer Law (ACL), contained within Schedule 2 of the CCA.[1]

Penalties for unfair practices

By the newly amended section 76 of the CCA, the penalties that apply to the conduct that contravenes provisions relating to it have been amended:

  • restrictive trade practices;[2]
  • certain news media and digital platforms mandatory bargaining code;[3]
  • compliance with gas market instruments;[4]
  • excessive surcharge payments;[5]
  • consumer data rights;[6]
  • motor vehicle service and repair information sharing scheme;[7]
  • price exploitation or false and/or misleading representations about the effect of the carbon tax repeal on prices;[8] and
  • providing information to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission or a Tribunal.[9]

The table below summarises the maximum penalties applicable under the CCA both pre-enactment and post-enactment of the Act, against corporations found to have breached the CCA, being the greater of:

Pre-enactment of the ActPost-enactment of the Act
$10 million; Three times the value of the benefit obtained; or If the value of the benefit cannot be determined, 10% of annual turnover.$50 million; Three times the value of the benefit obtained; or If the value of the benefit cannot be determined, 30% of the adjusted turnover during the breach turnover period.

Post-enactment of the Act, it is clear that steeper penalties are a direct result of the amendment.  It is less clear when the penalty to apply in circumstances where the benefit obtained by conduct breaching relevant provisions of the CCA is unable to be determined.  That penalty is to be calculated with reference to the ‘adjusted turnover’ and the ‘breach turnover period’.  But what do those terms mean?

Adjusted turnover and breach turnover period

By section 4 of the CCA, adjusted turnover is defined as:

… the sum of the values of all the supplies that the body corporate, and any body related to the body corporate, have made, or are likely to make, during the period, other than:

  • supplies made from any of those bodies corporate to any other of those bodies corporate;
  • supplies that are input taxed;
  • supplies that are not for consideration;
  • supplies that are not made in connection with an enterprise that the body corporate carries on; or
  • supplies that are not connected with the indirect tax zone.

In short, where a company (or body corporate) makes a supply of goods or services in exchange for consideration, which is ordinarily money, and will be counted towards its adjusted turnover unless it falls into the above listed excluded categories.

The breach turnover period in relation to contravening conduct varies in accordance with peculiarities of each contravention but it is generally a period of 12 months ending at the end of the month in which the contravening conduct ceases.[10]

Unfair contract terms

The Act provides an express provision for penalty in circumstances in particular circumstances where, amongst other things, a contract or part of it, is found to be unfair.  In fact, a person or company will contravene section 23(2A) of the ACL if:

  • the person makes a contract;
  • the contract is a consumer contract or small business contract;
  • the contract is a standard form contract;
  • a term of the contract is unfair; and
  • the person (or company) proposed the unfair term.

A term of a contract will be unfair if it creates a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations under the agreement, is not reasonably necessary, and would cause detriment.[11]

A court may order a person found to be contravening protections against unfair contracting by section 224 of the ACL and have them be liable to pecuniary penalties as the court determines to be appropriate or the unfair part of the contract may be declared void.

Takeaways

Changes to the various pieces of legislation implemented by the Act strengthen the pecuniary penalties open to courts in redressing unfair conduct and the use of unfair contract terms in standard form contracts.  The amendments substantially increase the severity of the penalties which may be imposed and expand remedial powers of the courts to address unfair contract terms by establishing an express obligation that standard form contracts do not contain unfair terms.

Links and further references

Legislation

Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)

Treasury Laws Amendment (More Competition, Better Prices) Act 2022 (Cth)

Further information about Australian Consumer Law

If you need advice on the changes to the ACL and what it means for your business, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:

Doyles Recommended TMT Lawyer 2024

[1]               Part IV of the CCA.

[2]               Certain sections of Part IVBA of the CCA as specified in section 76(4A).

[3]               CCA ss 53ZQ(1)-(3), 53ZV, 53ZQ(1).

[4]               CCA s 55B.

[5]               CCA ss 56BO(1), 56BU(1), 56CD.

[6]               Part IVE of the CCA.

[7]               CCA ss 60C and 60K.

[8]               CCA s 92.

[9]               CCA s 4 “breach turnover period”.

[10]             ACL s 24(1)(a)-(b).


Related insights about Australian Consumer Law

  • Scam Prevention Framework – issues for businesses

    Scam Prevention Framework – issues for businesses

    On 13 February 2025, the Australian Parliament passed the Scams Prevention Framework 2025 (Cth) (Act) in response to the national “scam pandemic” that has purportedly cost the country billions of dollars over the past few years. The Act amends the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA) and other related Acts.  The amendments to the…

    Read more …

  • Damages for competitor misleading conduct under the ACL

    Damages for competitor misleading conduct under the ACL

    Section 236 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) entitles any person, including corporations – to claim compensation for loss or damage suffered from misleading or deceptive conduct.  The High Court has developed numerous general principles for assessing loss or damage which we will discuss in this article.

    Read more …

  • Unfair contract terms, penalties and ACCC v Employsure 2020

    Unfair contract terms, penalties and ACCC v Employsure 2020

    When deciding whether a contractual term is unfair, a Court will likely consider if the term would cause a significant unbalance, if it is not reasonably necessary to protect legitimate interests, or if it would cause detriment.  Careful consideration should be given to the inclusion of clauses of this nature in standard form contracts, especially…

    Read more …

  • Biologi’s Bf & Bk serums contain no Vitamin C – Court Orders prove it!

    Biologi’s Bf & Bk serums contain no Vitamin C – Court Orders prove it!

    The recent decision of the Federal Court of Australia Native Extracts Pty Ltd v Plant Extracts Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 1265 where final declarations and orders were made against Mr Ross Macdougald (Macdougald), Plant Extracts Pty Ltd ACN 613 551 349 (Plant Extracts) and skincare brand Biologi Pty Ltd ACN 618 697 297 (Biologi) sheds…

    Read more …

  • ACCC seeks input on environmental and sustainability guidance

    ACCC seeks input on environmental and sustainability guidance

    The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission releases Draft Guidance to help businesses make environmental and sustainability claims without misleading consumers. Seeking input from stakeholders to ensure guidance is effective and up-to-date with consumer law.

    Read more …

  • Misleading and deceptive conduct – Invisalign v SmileDirectClub

    Misleading and deceptive conduct – Invisalign v SmileDirectClub

    The case of Invisalign Australia Pty Limited v SmileDirectClub LLC [2023] FCA 395 (Invisalign v SDC) involved two (2) companies that offer what’s referred to as the “clear aligner teeth straightening treatment” (Clear Aligner).  On 23 December 2021, Invisalign Australia Pty Limited (Invisalign) commenced proceedings against SmileDirectClub Australia Pty Ltd and its US parent company…

    Read more …

  • What are the ACCC’s 2023/2024 enforcement priorities?

    What are the ACCC’s 2023/2024 enforcement priorities?

    The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission’s (ACCC) enforcement priorities for 2023/2024 include environmental and sustainability claims, scam detection and disruption, consumer law issues in the digital economy, unfair contract terms, essential services, energy and telecommunications and wholesale gas markets.

    Read more …

  • Consumer law changes – what business owners need to know

    Consumer law changes – what business owners need to know

    The Treasury Laws Amendment (More Competition, Better Prices) Act 2022 (Cth) (Act) amends various pieces of legislation to provide stronger competition and consumer protections.  In particular, the Act bolsters the penalties applicable for offences relating to unfair practices and unfair contract terms under as contained within the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA) and…

    Read more …

  • Greenwashing: the ACCC’s new priority

    Greenwashing: the ACCC’s new priority

    The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is taking aim at businesses that mislead consumers with false environmental and sustainability claims. Find out what this could mean for businesses and what actions they need to take to stay compliant with the Australian Consumer Law.

    Read more …

Send this to a friend