Corporate law Brisbane

Governance standards for not-for-profit organisations

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawCorporate lawGovernance standards for not-for-profit organisations

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–4 minutes

The vagaries of corporate governance is a regular and sometimes controversial topic of discussion in Australian business circles.  It is also the subject of much judicial interpretation.

On 1 July 2013, the Australian Charities and Not‑for‑profits Commission Amendment Regulation 2013 (No. 1) (Cth) (Regulations) came into effect by amending the Australian Charities and Not‑for‑profits Commission Act 2013 (Cth).

One of the principal effects of the Regulations is to insert Division 45 – Governance Standards into the Regulations – creating what has become known as the “Governance Standards”.  In order for a charity to be registered with the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC) it must comply with the Governance Standards.

The ACNC is the government regulator created by the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission Act 2012 (Cth) charged with monitoring compliance with the Governance Standards.

Simplified outline of the Governance Standards

The simplified outline contained at section 45.1 of the Regulations provides that:

The governance standards support registered entities in fulfilling their objectives by providing a minimum level of assurance that they meet community expectations in relation to how a registered entity should be managed”.

The variable nature of governance

The simplified outline contained in the Regulations provides that the steps that a registered entity must take to comply with governance standards will vary according to:

  • its particular circumstances;
  • the sources of its funding;
  • the nature of its activities; and
  • the needs of the public.

Who must comply with the Governance Standards?

Section 45.1(1)(a) of the Regulations provides that the object of the governance standard is to commit a registered entity, its members and its responsible entities to the registered entity’s purposes.

What is a registered entity?

Registered entities are those that are registered with the ACNC as a charity.

Is registration with ACNC mandatory?

Registration is voluntary, however only registered entities are eligible to receive charity tax concessions.

The ACNC governance standards

The ACNC Governance Standards are comprised in five (5) parts contained in subdivision 45 B of the Regulations.

Governance standard 1 (GS1) – purposes and not for profit-nature of registered entity

GS1 provides that charities must be working towards their charitable purpose and must provide information about their purpose to the public.

Governance standard 2 (GS 2) – accountability to members

A registered entity that has members must be accountable to its members.  In addition, the members must have an adequate opportunity to raise concerns about the governance of the registered entity.  The notes to GS2 provide examples of steps which registered entities could take to ensure that they are accountable.

Governance standard 3 (GS3) – compliance with Australian laws

GS3 aims to provide members of the public trust and confidence that a registered entity is governed in a way that complies with Australian laws.

Governance standard 4 (GS4) – suitability of responsible entities

Registered Entities must ensure that their responsible entities comply with Australian law and must check that their responsible persons are not disqualified from managing a corporation under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

Governance standard 5 (GS5) – Duties of responsible persons

GS5 provides that a registered entity must take reasonable steps to ensure that responsible persons comply with their duties as described in the Governance Standards.  Further GS5 describes duties which are akin to the common law duties of a director of a company.  The words “care and diligence”, “fiduciary” and “disclose material conflicts” attempt to imply a statutory duty of care to the controllers of the registered entity.  Most notably, section 45.25(2)(g) of the Regulations provides that reasonable steps must be taken not to allow the registered entity to operate whilst insolvent.

Links and further resources

Legislation

Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission Act 2012 (Cth)

Australian Charities and Not‑for‑profits Commission Amendment Regulation 2013 (No. 1) (Cth)

Other links

Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission

ACNC media release introducing the Governance Standards.

Further information

If you need assistance to ensure you comply with the Governance Standards, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about corporate governance

  • Office of AI announced by Federal Government

    Office of AI announced by Federal Government

    On 15 July 2026, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese (Prime Minister) announced by media release an expansion of the Federal Government’s (Government) existing artificial intelligence (AI) governance framework, including the establishment of a new Office of AI as well as plans to legislate national standards governing large-scale data centres, AI training and the use of Australian…

    Read more …

  • What amounts to use of a trade mark outside of Australia?

    What amounts to use of a trade mark outside of Australia?

    The case of Lamont v Malishus & Ors (No 4) [2019] FCCA 3206 (Lamont v Malishus) involved an action for infringement of a registered trade mark in Australia under the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (TMA).  This case raised several issues, including, whether using a word as part of a domain name constituted “use” as…

    Read more …

  • WIJOAV v Goldstone – shareholder oppression in a private equity context

    WIJOAV v Goldstone – shareholder oppression in a private equity context

    The recent case of WIJOAV Services Pty Ltd v Goldstone Private Equity Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 622 (WIJOAV v Goldstone) involved a claim of shareholder oppression under section 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act).  The case established that a shareholder in a private equity fund may be oppressed by a co-investor where…

    Read more …

  • Mere puffery vs misleading and deceptive conduct – where is the line?

    Mere puffery vs misleading and deceptive conduct – where is the line?

    In the case of Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54 (ACCC v TPG), the High Court of Australia (High Court) drew a distinction between mere puffery and representations with the intention of marketing.  This article explores the decision in ACCC v TPG and the distinction between puffery and…

    Read more …

  • Federal Court dismisses continuous disclosure claim

    Federal Court dismisses continuous disclosure claim

    The Federal Court recently dismissed Australia Securities and Investment Commission’s (ASIC) claim in Australian Securities and Investment Commission v Nuix Limited [2026] FCA 490 (ASIC v Nuix) that Nuix Limited breached its obligations under section 674 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act).  Nuix Limited (Nuix) successfully contested ASIC’s allegation that it had breached…

    Read more …

  • Clash of jurisdictions and trade mark infringement

    Clash of jurisdictions and trade mark infringement

    The case of International Hair Cosmetics Group Pty Ltd v International Hair Cosmetics Limited [2011] FCA 339 (Case) considered whether use of Australian registered trade marks on a British website constituted “use in Australia” under section 120 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (TMA).  It was ultimately held that, despite use of the two…

    Read more …

  • Individual Flexibility Arrangements: an overview

    Individual Flexibility Arrangements: an overview

    Modern awards and enterprise agreements set out the minimum terms and conditions of employment for most Australian workers performing different roles.  The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) provides a mechanism by which an employer and an individual employee may, by agreement, adjust the operation of certain terms in their Award to better suit theircircumstances. …

    Read more …

  • Coercive control and shareholder oppression

    Coercive control and shareholder oppression

    The Criminal Law (Coercive Control and Affirmative Consent) and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2024 (Qld) came into effect on 18 March 2024, by adding chapter 29A to the Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) (Criminal Code).  This chapter establishes a separate offence of “coercive control’, which stems from domestic violence offences and involves the use of…

    Read more …

  • Budget bills introduced to House of Representatives

    Budget bills introduced to House of Representatives

    On 28 May 2026, the Commonwealth Government introduced the following two (2) tax reform bills into the House of Representatives: These two (2) Bills have been tabled as part of the Albanese Government’s tax reform package announced in the 2026–27 Federal Budget on 12 May 2026.   Minimum CGT Bill The Minimum CGT Bill amends…

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend