Corporate law Brisbane

Governance standards for not-for-profit organisations

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawCorporate lawGovernance standards for not-for-profit organisations

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–4 minutes

The vagaries of corporate governance is a regular and sometimes controversial topic of discussion in Australian business circles.  It is also the subject of much judicial interpretation.

On 1 July 2013, the Australian Charities and Not‑for‑profits Commission Amendment Regulation 2013 (No. 1) (Cth) (Regulations) came into effect by amending the Australian Charities and Not‑for‑profits Commission Act 2013 (Cth).

One of the principal effects of the Regulations is to insert Division 45 – Governance Standards into the Regulations – creating what has become known as the “Governance Standards”.  In order for a charity to be registered with the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC) it must comply with the Governance Standards.

The ACNC is the government regulator created by the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission Act 2012 (Cth) charged with monitoring compliance with the Governance Standards.

Simplified outline of the Governance Standards

The simplified outline contained at section 45.1 of the Regulations provides that:

The governance standards support registered entities in fulfilling their objectives by providing a minimum level of assurance that they meet community expectations in relation to how a registered entity should be managed”.

The variable nature of governance

The simplified outline contained in the Regulations provides that the steps that a registered entity must take to comply with governance standards will vary according to:

  • its particular circumstances;
  • the sources of its funding;
  • the nature of its activities; and
  • the needs of the public.

Who must comply with the Governance Standards?

Section 45.1(1)(a) of the Regulations provides that the object of the governance standard is to commit a registered entity, its members and its responsible entities to the registered entity’s purposes.

What is a registered entity?

Registered entities are those that are registered with the ACNC as a charity.

Is registration with ACNC mandatory?

Registration is voluntary, however only registered entities are eligible to receive charity tax concessions.

The ACNC governance standards

The ACNC Governance Standards are comprised in five (5) parts contained in subdivision 45 B of the Regulations.

Governance standard 1 (GS1) – purposes and not for profit-nature of registered entity

GS1 provides that charities must be working towards their charitable purpose and must provide information about their purpose to the public.

Governance standard 2 (GS 2) – accountability to members

A registered entity that has members must be accountable to its members.  In addition, the members must have an adequate opportunity to raise concerns about the governance of the registered entity.  The notes to GS2 provide examples of steps which registered entities could take to ensure that they are accountable.

Governance standard 3 (GS3) – compliance with Australian laws

GS3 aims to provide members of the public trust and confidence that a registered entity is governed in a way that complies with Australian laws.

Governance standard 4 (GS4) – suitability of responsible entities

Registered Entities must ensure that their responsible entities comply with Australian law and must check that their responsible persons are not disqualified from managing a corporation under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

Governance standard 5 (GS5) – Duties of responsible persons

GS5 provides that a registered entity must take reasonable steps to ensure that responsible persons comply with their duties as described in the Governance Standards.  Further GS5 describes duties which are akin to the common law duties of a director of a company.  The words “care and diligence”, “fiduciary” and “disclose material conflicts” attempt to imply a statutory duty of care to the controllers of the registered entity.  Most notably, section 45.25(2)(g) of the Regulations provides that reasonable steps must be taken not to allow the registered entity to operate whilst insolvent.

Links and further resources

Legislation

Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission Act 2012 (Cth)

Australian Charities and Not‑for‑profits Commission Amendment Regulation 2013 (No. 1) (Cth)

Other links

Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission

ACNC media release introducing the Governance Standards.

Further information

If you need assistance to ensure you comply with the Governance Standards, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about corporate governance

  • Franchisors must provide franchisees a reasonable opportunity to make a ROI

    Franchisors must provide franchisees a reasonable opportunity to make a ROI

    Recent reforms to the Franchising Code of Conduct introduced a new obligation requiring franchisors to give franchisees a reasonable opportunity to make a return on their investment (ROI).  This change reflects concern that some franchise arrangements required franchisees to make substantial upfront investments without a realistic opportunity to make a return on this investment.

    Read more …

  • Valuing ESS Interests

    Valuing ESS Interests

    A company, whether listed or unlisted, can grant its employees an interest in its equity (ESS Interest), including through an employee share scheme (ESS) or employee share option plan (ESOP).  There are restrictions contained in both the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) and Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) (ITAA) that determine the price…

    Read more …

  • ESS vs ESOP – what’s the difference?

    ESS vs ESOP – what’s the difference?

    Employee share schemes (ESS) and employee share option plans (ESOP) are commonly used by corporations to incentivise employees and align performance with company growth by providing them with an interest in the company.  While the terms are often used interchangeably, they have distinct legal and structural differences under Australian law.  This article explains the key…

    Read more …

  • AI businesses should have duty of care

    AI businesses should have duty of care

    In a recent interview with InnovationAus.com, Victorian Senator Michelle Ananda-Rajah (Senator) emphasised the need to adopt digital duty of care laws for artificial intelligence (AI) companies.[1]  As a representative of the ALP and former AI start-up founder, the Senator calls for the proposed digital duty of care to apply to AI companies.  If implemented, the…

    Read more …

  • Disputed ESOP – Selak v National Tiles Co Pty Ltd

    Disputed ESOP – Selak v National Tiles Co Pty Ltd

    In the case of Selak v National Tiles, the Vic Supreme Court considered whether a company breached an option agreement governed by the terms of an Employee Share Option Plan (ESOP) by requiring an option holder to execute an undisclosed shareholders’ agreement as a condition of exercising vested options.  

    Read more …

  • Federal Court orders winding up of crypto mining investment scheme

    Federal Court orders winding up of crypto mining investment scheme

    The Federal Court of Australia delivered judgment in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v NGS Crypto Pty Ltd (No 5) [2025] FCA 1611, on 18 December 2025 ordering the winding up of two (2) cryptocurrency related entities after finding that they operated an unlicensed financial services business and an unregistered managed investment scheme in contravention…

    Read more …

  • Full Court clarifies confidentiality of supplier and contact info

    Full Court clarifies confidentiality of supplier and contact info

    On 10 May 2023, the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) delivered its judgment in the case of New Aim Pty Ltd v Leung [2023] FCAFC 67 (New Aim v Leung), allowing an appeal concerning alleged misuse of confidential supplier information by a former senior employee. The decision provides guidance on:…

    Read more …

  • Online Safety – is your online business a DIS or a RES?

    Online Safety – is your online business a DIS or a RES?

    Whether your online business has to comply with the obligations contained in the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) (OSA), and related standards and industry codes will largely depend on how your business is classified because of the functionality it provides to end users in Australia.

    Read more …

  • Importance of meta data in discovery – Hamlan v Levonix

    Importance of meta data in discovery – Hamlan v Levonix

    The recent copyright case of Hamlan Homes Pty Ltd trading as Hamlan Homes and Geelong Homes v Levonix Homes Pty Ltd (No 3) [2025] FedCFamC2G 565 (Hamlan v Levonix)involved a dispute between Hamlan Homes Pty Ltd 006 313 015 (Hamlan) and Levonix Homes Pty Ltd ACN 168 777 384 (Levonix) that provides insight into preservation…

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend