The vagaries of corporate governance is a regular and sometimes controversial topic of discussion in Australian business circles. It is also the subject of much judicial interpretation.
On 1 July 2013, the Australian Charities and Not‑for‑profits Commission Amendment Regulation 2013 (No. 1) (Cth) (Regulations) came into effect by amending the Australian Charities and Not‑for‑profits Commission Act 2013 (Cth).
One of the principal effects of the Regulations is to insert Division 45 – Governance Standards into the Regulations – creating what has become known as the “Governance Standards”. In order for a charity to be registered with the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC) it must comply with the Governance Standards.
The ACNC is the government regulator created by the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission Act 2012 (Cth) charged with monitoring compliance with the Governance Standards.
Simplified outline of the Governance Standards
The simplified outline contained at section 45.1 of the Regulations provides that:
“The governance standards support registered entities in fulfilling their objectives by providing a minimum level of assurance that they meet community expectations in relation to how a registered entity should be managed”.
The variable nature of governance
The simplified outline contained in the Regulations provides that the steps that a registered entity must take to comply with governance standards will vary according to:
- its particular circumstances;
- the sources of its funding;
- the nature of its activities; and
- the needs of the public.
Who must comply with the Governance Standards?
Section 45.1(1)(a) of the Regulations provides that the object of the governance standard is to commit a registered entity, its members and its responsible entities to the registered entity’s purposes.
What is a registered entity?
Registered entities are those that are registered with the ACNC as a charity.
Is registration with ACNC mandatory?
Registration is voluntary, however only registered entities are eligible to receive charity tax concessions.
The ACNC governance standards
The ACNC Governance Standards are comprised in five (5) parts contained in subdivision 45 B of the Regulations.
Governance standard 1 (GS1) – purposes and not for profit-nature of registered entity
GS1 provides that charities must be working towards their charitable purpose and must provide information about their purpose to the public.
Governance standard 2 (GS 2) – accountability to members
A registered entity that has members must be accountable to its members. In addition, the members must have an adequate opportunity to raise concerns about the governance of the registered entity. The notes to GS2 provide examples of steps which registered entities could take to ensure that they are accountable.
Governance standard 3 (GS3) – compliance with Australian laws
GS3 aims to provide members of the public trust and confidence that a registered entity is governed in a way that complies with Australian laws.
Governance standard 4 (GS4) – suitability of responsible entities
Registered Entities must ensure that their responsible entities comply with Australian law and must check that their responsible persons are not disqualified from managing a corporation under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
Governance standard 5 (GS5) – Duties of responsible persons
GS5 provides that a registered entity must take reasonable steps to ensure that responsible persons comply with their duties as described in the Governance Standards. Further GS5 describes duties which are akin to the common law duties of a director of a company. The words “care and diligence”, “fiduciary” and “disclose material conflicts” attempt to imply a statutory duty of care to the controllers of the registered entity. Most notably, section 45.25(2)(g) of the Regulations provides that reasonable steps must be taken not to allow the registered entity to operate whilst insolvent.
Links and further resources
Legislation
Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission Act 2012 (Cth)
Australian Charities and Not‑for‑profits Commission Amendment Regulation 2013 (No. 1) (Cth)
Other links
Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission
ACNC media release introducing the Governance Standards.
Further information
If you need assistance to ensure you comply with the Governance Standards, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.
Related insights about corporate governance
-
Assigning intellectual property and the right to sue
This case examines Re Taypar Pty Ltd v Benko Santic [1989] FCA 543, which determined that an assignee of intellectual property rights cannot sue for pre-assignment infringements, unless the assignment explicitly assigns a right to do so.
-
Overview of negligence claims in domestic building disputes
A domestic building contract gone wrong: Cerda v Jacob [2020] QCATA 57 highlights the difficulties homeowners face when contracts don’t comply with the Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act (Qld) 1991, leading to issues with enforcing the contract and asserting rights to quality works or remedy defective construction.
-
Ending a domestic building contract
Ending a domestic building contract can be complicated. Discover the requirements for a home warranty insurance claim and the implications of the Harper Property Builders Pty Ltd v Queensland Building and Construction Commission [2018] QCATA 70. Find out how to navigate a building contract “divorce” with good faith.
-
Think twice before claiming delay due to COVID-19
In response to COVID-19, the Federal Court of Australia has adopted virtual proceedings and is reluctant to grant stays or adjournments. Read this article to learn more about the Court’s view and the pros and cons of virtual trials.
-
Evidence from the Wayback Machine accepted
Australian Courts are increasingly considering the use of evidence from the Wayback Machine, but questions remain as to whether they will accept such reports in practice and what will be allowed?
-
Arbitration clauses in building disputes
The QCAT decision of 4D Electrical Qld v Greyburn Pty Ltd [2020] QCAT 74 shows arbitration can be a more efficient alternative to Court/tribunal litigation. Courts uphold contractual obligations agreed to by parties, proving arbitration is a viable option.
-
Particulars – their importance in civil litigation
This article provides an overview of the Federal Court’s rules and procedures for preliminary discovery, which allows potential applicants to determine if there is a good cause of action before filing a claim. Learn how to navigate the process and understand the Court’s expectations.
-
COVID-19 relief measures for companies
The Federal Government has passed a package of temporary measures to support businesses and relieve financial distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Find out how these measures could affect your business and what you need to know.
-
$750k awarded for fake online reviews
The Supreme Court of South Australia awarded $A750,000 in damages to a lawyer in the case of Cheng v Lok [2020] SASC 14, demonstrating the serious consequences of posting fake reviews online. Find out more about the implications of this case and alternative legal actions for companies that receive negative reviews.
