Corporate law Brisbane

Shifts in criminal liability for company officers

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawCorporate lawShifts in criminal liability for company officers

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

2–3 minutes

The Personal Liability for Corporate Fault Reform Act 2012 (PLCFRA), assented to on 10 December 2012, was implemented in an effort to ensure that personal criminal liability for corporate fault is imposed in accordance with the principles of good corporate governance.  Prior to the PLCFRA, company secretaries and directors were made criminally liable for the acts of the corporation in which they served.

The reform seeks to ensure that personal criminal liability for corporate fault is proportionate to the individual’s direct involvement in the corporate fault, as opposed to their involvement with the corporation itself.

PLCFRA amends a number of Acts, across a range of areas, including the Corporations Act 2001, the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 and the Health Insurance Act 1973.

Brief overview of changes

The imposition of personal criminal liability for corporate fault is removed, except where:

  • the director or officer knew of the offence, was involved in the offence, or failed to take reasonable steps to prevent the offence;
  • the harm that the offence aims to prevent is serious; and
  • corporate penalties alone would be ineffective in preventing the conduct in question.

Consequences of failure to comply

If the company secretary, sole director or director if no secretary has been appointed (Company Officer) is found to be personally liable for corporate fault, then they are now liable for a civil penalty of up to $3,000, or $200,000 if the breach materially prejudices the interests of the corporation, or materially prejudices the corporation’s ability to pay its creditors, or is ‘serious’ in accordance with section 1317G of the Corporations Act 2001.

Note that a defence is available if the Company Officer can show that they took reasonable steps to ensure that the company complied with the relevant amended section (amended section 188(3) of the Corporations Act 2001).

Who will be affected by the changes?

All Company Officers are affected by PLCFRA.  The reforms seek to reduce the regulatory burden and risk of personal criminal liability for Company Officers, however risk and compliance issues are far from non-existent.

Links and further references

Personal Liability for Corporate Fault Reform Act 2012

Personal Liability for Corporate Fault – Guidelines for apply the COAG Principles

Inquiry into the Personal Liability for Corporate Fault Reform Bill 2012

Further information

If you need advice on directors duties, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights on directors duties

  • WIJOAV v Goldstone – shareholder oppression in a private equity context

    WIJOAV v Goldstone – shareholder oppression in a private equity context

    The recent case of WIJOAV Services Pty Ltd v Goldstone Private Equity Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 622 (WIJOAV v Goldstone) involved a claim of shareholder oppression under section 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act).  The case established that a shareholder in a private equity fund may be oppressed by a co-investor where…

    Read more …

  • Hylepin v Doshay: excuses for shareholder oppression?

    Hylepin v Doshay: excuses for shareholder oppression?

    On 19 November 2021, the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia published its decision in the case of Hylepin Pty Ltd v Doshay Pty Ltd [2021] FCAFC 201 (Hylepin v Doshay).  Hylepin v Doshay was appealed from the decision in Hylepin Pty Ltd v Doshay Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1370 that concerned a…

    Read more …

  • Accountant liability in shareholder oppression cases

    Accountant liability in shareholder oppression cases

    The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) imposes liability on directors where they engage in shareholder oppression.[1]  While this is a director’s duty, third parties may also be held liable for the actions of a director or company where they were involved in the oppressive conduct.  Internal and external accountants of a company can and…

    Read more …

  • Can a ‘commercial purpose’ excuse shareholder oppression?

    Can a ‘commercial purpose’ excuse shareholder oppression?

    On 19 November 2021, the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia published its decision in the case of Hylepin Pty Ltd v Doshay Pty Ltd [2021] FCAFC 201 (Hylepin v Doshay).  Hylepin v Doshay was appealed from the decision in Hylepin Pty Ltd v Doshay Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1370 that concerned a…

    Read more …

  • Directors’ obligations to comply with Accounting Standards

    Directors’ obligations to comply with Accounting Standards

    Directors are personally liable for ensuring their company operates in accordance with corporate governance and accounting standards.  Obligations contained in part 2M.2 and 2M.3 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) outline obligations for companies to keep financial records and prepare annual financial and director’s reports.  Sections 180 and 344 of the Corporations Act…

    Read more …

  • Compensation and breaches of directors’ duties

    Compensation and breaches of directors’ duties

    Should it be held that a director of a company has breached their statutory duties, as contained in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act), then the question arises as to how a Court will determine the amount of compensation to be paid by the errant director.  The remedies provided for in the Act include declaratory…

    Read more …

  • Are fiduciary duties owed by former company directors?

    Are fiduciary duties owed by former company directors?

    A former director’s duties and responsibilities to their previous company may not end with their resignation. Find out how the Advanced Fuels Technology Pty Ltd v Blythe & Ors [2018] VSC 286 case explored this concept and what the Court had to say.

    Read more …

  • COVID-19 relief measures for companies

    COVID-19 relief measures for companies

    The Federal Government has passed a package of temporary measures to support businesses and relieve financial distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Find out how these measures could affect your business and what you need to know.

    Read more …

  • Insolvent trading – prison for former Kleenmaid director

    Insolvent trading – prison for former Kleenmaid director

    Former Kleenmaid director, Andrew Young, sentenced to nine years in prison for fraud, criminal insolvent trading and causing $330,000 to be withdrawn from company bank account. Learn more about Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)’s actions to ensure directors meet their obligations and the consequences of allowing companies to trade whilst insolvent.

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend