internet law

Dark fibre contracts for telecommunications providers

HomePrivate: BlogLegal insightsDark fibre contracts for telecommunications providers

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

4–5 minutes

Dark fibre refers to access to ‘unlit’ (unused) telecommunications fibre.  Generally, large telecommunications carriers and government utilities (Supplier) have dark fibre networks laid out that can be available to carriage service providers (CSPs) to access to scale up their network.  Below we set out key elements of dark fibre and corresponding issues in telecommunications service agreements between CSPs and their business end users (End User).

Layer 2 or layer 3 ethernet compared dark fibre

Dark fibre exists in certain areas because Carriers have laid out more fibre optic infrastructure than needed.  The physical cables are then able to support CSPs who want their own connections.  In comparison, layer 2 or layer 3 ethernet service is used on a leased bandwidth basis.  The network is already activated and the CSP is not generally managing the connection or equipment.

Benefits of dark fibre

Dark fibre has many benefits, including:

  • Giving CSPs full control and freedom over their network, equipment and connection settings. The CSP can implement the type of transmission technology, protocols and features of the network and is a way of CSPs ‘building’ their own network with control over how it works, as the service won’t be shared with others;
  • Dark fibre also allows CSPs to upscale to suit the CSPs’ changing business needs. Consequently, data and speed capacities are only limited by the equipment the CSP uses over the dark fibre network;
  • Point-to-point connections are more reliable as they bypass the carriers core network routing and switching;
  • With linked point-to-point networks, data is highly secure and does not enter the public internet and the CSP can specify the security protocol and standards, including encryption standards and settings; and
  • Creating a network without buying the infrastructure.

Access to dark fibre

Access to dark fibre is a service with the underlying fibre-optic infrastructure leased or purchased from a Supplier.

Therefore, it is important to frame the licence granted to the End User to use the dark fibre service component.  End Users should ensure that that the licence gives them an exclusive licence to use a dark fibre circuit between two end points.  This ensures that the circuit is not shared and traffic impairment and latency is minimised.

Often Suppliers and CSP’s will allocate the fibre optic cores to be used in circuits on the condition that they have the discretion to modify, substitute, replace or relocate the path of the cores.  This can potentially cause service disruption for the End User, so the End User should ensure that advance notice of the change is given in order that the End User may make any required network changes.  The End User should also ensure that any change to the path of the cores can only be done if the standard of service is not materially reduced.

Service Levels

Service levels for dark fibre access provided by Supplier’s must be clearly stated, such as committed service availability and resolution times.  Service levels for a single path may be, say, 99.95%, however the End User should expect that service levels for the service which consists of multiple paths with complete physical separation should be higher, say 99.999%.

As dark fibre agreements are B2B, the End User should insist on service credits for failure to reach the service level availability target on a sliding scale dependent on the length of downtime.  In this sector, a significant downtime of, say, 4 hours in month with an availability of <99.5%, should carry with it a substantial service credit of around 50%.

From the Supplier’s perspective, it should exclude specified events from the calculation of service availability time, such as force majeure, failure of the End User’s equipment, planned maintenance, failure of third party upstream Suppliers and any permitted service suspension rights the CSP has.

Liability

CSPs should insist that the payment of any service credits is sole and exclusive remedy of the End User and exclude liability for any loss of profits, loss of business, loss of data incurred by the End User arising from the failure to achieve the service levels or provide the services.

Security and viruses

CSPs should clearly state that they do not have complete control over the security or content of data passing over the network and any systems operated by third parties.

Further, the CSP should clearly state that any property damage suffered by the End User, say damage to the End User equipment arising from a network virus, is limited and falls under the general liability cap.

Takeaways

Using dark fibre to provide a telecommunications service has many benefits, particularly around scalability, network control and reducing infrastructure spend, however Suppliers still need to ensure that there End User agreements limit their liability and risk exposure.

Links and further references

Legislation

Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth)

Further information about dark fibre agreements for telcos

If you need advice on Carrier to CSP dark fibre access agreements or CSP to End User telecommunications service agreements, please feel free to contact me for a confidential and obligation free discussion.


Related insights for telecommunication service providers

  • Office of AI announced by Federal Government

    Office of AI announced by Federal Government

    On 15 July 2026, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese (Prime Minister) announced by media release an expansion of the Federal Government’s (Government) existing artificial intelligence (AI) governance framework, including the establishment of a new Office of AI as well as plans to legislate national standards governing large-scale data centres, AI training and the use of Australian…

    Read more …

  • AI businesses should have duty of care

    AI businesses should have duty of care

    In a recent interview with InnovationAus.com, Victorian Senator Michelle Ananda-Rajah (Senator) emphasised the need to adopt digital duty of care laws for artificial intelligence (AI) companies.[1]  As a representative of the ALP and former AI start-up founder, the Senator calls for the proposed digital duty of care to apply to AI companies.  If implemented, the…

    Read more …

  • Federal Court orders winding up of crypto mining investment scheme

    Federal Court orders winding up of crypto mining investment scheme

    The Federal Court of Australia delivered judgment in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v NGS Crypto Pty Ltd (No 5) [2025] FCA 1611, on 18 December 2025 ordering the winding up of two (2) cryptocurrency related entities after finding that they operated an unlicensed financial services business and an unregistered managed investment scheme in contravention…

    Read more …

  • Online Safety – is your online business a DIS or a RES?

    Online Safety – is your online business a DIS or a RES?

    Whether your online business has to comply with the obligations contained in the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) (OSA), and related standards and industry codes will largely depend on how your business is classified because of the functionality it provides to end users in Australia.

    Read more …

  • Bill to allow victims of AI deepfakes to sue for emotional damages

    Bill to allow victims of AI deepfakes to sue for emotional damages

    On 24 November 2025, Senator David Pocock introduced a private Senator’s bill, the Online Safety and Other Legislation Amendment (My Face, My Rights) Bill 2025 (Cth) (Bill) to amend the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) (Online Safety Act) and the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) (Privacy Act). 

    Read more …

  • Malcolm Burrows on ABC’s “Legal Eagles” segment – Deepfakes

    Malcolm Burrows on ABC’s “Legal Eagles” segment – Deepfakes

    On 3 December 2025, Malcolm Burrows appeared live on Katherine Feeney’s ABC Radio program, “Legal Eagles” as the Technology and Intellectual Property Lawyer to discuss the proposed amendments to the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) through the introduction of the Online Safety and other legislation Amendment (My Face Rights) Bill (Cth) 2025 (My Face Rights…

    Read more …

  • Federal Gov rules out copyright text and data mining exception for AI

    Federal Gov rules out copyright text and data mining exception for AI

    On 26 October 2025, the Attorney-General, Hon Michelle Rowland MP, published a media release reiterating that the current Federal Government will not introduce a text and data mining (TDM) exception to copyright infringement in the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Copyright Act).  The Attorney-General’s Department will instead engage in further consultations with members of the Copyright…

    Read more …

  • Australian Government announces a digital duty of care

    Australian Government announces a digital duty of care

    The Australian Government has announced that it will soon be introducing legislation to create a digital duty of care under the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) (Act) in response to findings from an independent Statutory Review of the Online Safety Act 2021 (Review).  The Honourable Anika Wells MP announced that “big tech” companies will soon…

    Read more …

  • Dundas Lawyers achieves SMB1001 gold level cyber security certification

    Dundas Lawyers achieves SMB1001 gold level cyber security certification

    On 14 November 2025 Dundas Lawyers achieved the Gold level of the SMB1001 cybersecurity standard.

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend