media enquiries

Digital games tax offset introduced by Albanese

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

5–7 minutes

The Australian Government has announced its plans to enact the country’s first ever federal, “refundable tax offset” for the development of video games.  On 28 October 2022, the Albanese Labor Government announced its support for the digital games industry by proposing new legislation to develop a Digital Games Tax Offset (DGTO) in the near future.

If enacted in its present form, the DGTO will introduce a thirty (30) per cent refundable tax offset for eligible companies that spend a minimum of $500,000 on qualifying Australian development expenditure on eligible games.  This amendment will take effect from 1 July 2022.

The proposed new offset

According to the Exposure Draft Explanatory Materials – Income Tax Assessment Amendment (Digital Games Tax Offset) Bill 2021: Measure for Consultation (Explanatory Memorandum), the intention of the DGTO is to promote the growth and development of the digital games industry in Australia. The apparent reason for this is that there is recognised talent in this industry that has:

transferrable digital capabilities that Australia could apply to a range of other sectors.”

The proposed DGTO will be implemented through amendments to the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) by the addition of a new Division 378.  The implementation is said to:

  • strengthen the Australian digital games industry;
  • expand employment opportunities for digital and creative talent; and
  • enhance the industry’s international competitiveness and make Australia an attractive destination for foreign investment.

Section 378-2(1) of the Exposure Draft for the Treasury Laws Amendment (Measures for Consultation) Bill 2022: Digital games tax offset (Exposure Draft) defines the DGTO as:

A refundable tax offset of an amount that is 30% of a company’s qualifying Australian development expenditure on:

(a)   completing a new digital game; and

(b)    porting a completed digital game to a new platform; and

(c)   ongoing development of completed digital games during an income year.

Section 378-2(2) of the exposure draft provides:

One of the requirements for entitlement to the digital games tax offset is that the company must be issued with a completion certificate, a porting certificate, or an ongoing development certificate, which state the amount of qualifying Australian development expenditure on which the offset will be determined.

How does a Game developer get the Arts Minister to issue a certificate?

(a)        Completion certificate

The Arts Minister must issue a completion to a company for an income year in relation to a digital game if:

(i)         the game is completed in the income year;

(ii)        the company has made an application for a completion certificate in relation to the game;

(iii)       the total of the company’s qualifying Australian development expenditure incurred in completing the game is at least $500,000; and

(iv)      the Minister is satisfied that the conditions in subsections (7) and (8) are met.

(b)        Porting certificate

The Arts Minister must issue a certificate (a porting certificate) to a company for an income year in relation to a digital game if:

(i)         the game is ported in the income year;

(ii)        the company has made an application for a porting certificate in relation to the game;

(iii)       the total of the company’s qualifying Australian development expenditure incurred in porting the game is at least $500,000; and

(iv)      the Minister is satisfied that the conditions in subsections (7) and (8) are met.

(c)        Ongoing development certificate

The Arts Minister must issue a certificate (an ongoing development certificate) to a company for an income year in relation to the ongoing development of one or more digital games if:

(i)         ongoing development occurs in relation to the games in the income year;

(ii)        the company has made an application for the ongoing development certificate;

(iii)       the total of the company’s qualifying Australian development expenditure on the ongoing development of the games in the income year is at least $500,000; and

(iv)      the Minister is satisfied that the conditions in subsections (7) and (8) are met for each of the games.

Which entities are eligible for the DGTO?

According to clause 1.21 of the Explanatory Memorandum, only entities that are companies for tax purposes are entitled to this offset.  A company is entitled to the offset for an income year if:

  • it is an Australian resident, or an Australian permanent establishment of a non-resident company when it lodges the income tax return and when the tax offset is due to be credited;
  • the Arts Minister has issued to the company one or more certificates; and
  • the company claims the offset in its income tax return for the income year.

Which games are eligible for the DGTO?

Clause 1.27 of the Explanatory Memorandum provides that a game will be eligible for the DGTO:

if it is a digital game that has been primarily developed to be made available to the public for entertainment or education purposes.

Further, there are three (3) requirements a digital game must satisfy in order to be eligible for the DGTO that are:

  • the game must be made available for use over the internet;
  • the game must be primarily played through the internet; or
  • the game operates only when a player is connected to the internet.

It is said that the reason for the inclusion of these requirements is to ensure that the game is made widely available.

What constitutes development expenditure?

According to section 378-30(1) of the Exposure Draft, development expenditure on a digital game is expenditure that the company incurs in, or in relation to, the development of the game.  This includes the remuneration provided to employees employed by the company with the objective of developing the digital game.  These employees include, but are not limited to:

  • software developers, programmers and engineers;
  • game designers;
  • writers;
  • artists, animators and performers (for both voice and motion capture);
  • musicians (including composers) and sound designers;
  • project managers; and
  • behaviour analysts.

Takeaways

The focus of the Albanese Government in making the DGTO only available for Game Developers who develop games to be used via the internet is interesting.  Game Developers need to take the DGTO into account in their product design process.  (Readers of this article may appreciate the irony that the image of the gaming machines that appears with this article would not be connected to the internet and therefore would not be eligible for the DGTO!)

Links and Further references

Legislation

Exposure Draft for the Treasury Laws Amendment (Measures for Consultation) Bill 2022: Digital games tax offset

Exposure Draft Explanatory Materials – Income Tax Assessment Amendment (Digital Games Tax Offset) Bill 2021: Measure for Consultation

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth)

Further information about the digital games tax offset

If you are a Game Developer and would like assistance regarding the digital games tax offset, please contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about the digital games tax offset

  • A bet or a game? The Lottoland decision

    A bet or a game? The Lottoland decision

    The Supreme Court of New South Wales has ruled in favour of Lottoland Australia Pty Ltd, affirming that its disputed products fall under the exception of an Excluded Wagering Service as defined by the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth), clarifying the distinction between ‘bets’ and ‘games’.

    Read more …

  • Abhorrent violent content prohibited

    Abhorrent violent content prohibited

    Organizations hosting abhorrent violent material, such as terrorism, murder, torture, rape and kidnapping, now face hefty fines under the Criminal Code Amendment Act 2019 (Cth), up to 50,000 penalty units or 10% of annual turnover.

    Read more …

  • Domain name disputes – the case of eazyjet.com

    Domain name disputes – the case of eazyjet.com

    Learn more about domain name disputes and the evidence required to establish confusion, rights, and bad faith. Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) and World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) provide legal elements and remedies, and the implications of failing to respond to a complaint.

    Read more …

  • EU General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) – How to comply

    EU General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) – How to comply

    The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) applies to Australian entities processing personal data of European Union (EU) citizens/residents. It outlines principles, notification obligations, penalties for non-compliance, and requirements for cross-border data transfers.

    Read more …

  • Legal challenges arising from data loss

    Legal challenges arising from data loss

    Organisations must protect confidential data from external and internal threats. Learn steps to secure data, potential data breach implications, and how a data breach notification bill may require affected entities to notify consumers.

    Read more …

  • Data Breach Bill 2016 – key data security considerations

    Data Breach Bill 2016 – key data security considerations

    The Privacy Amendment (Notifiable Data Breaches) Bill 2016 has been passed, making notification of data breaches mandatory from 23 February 2018. Find out how this could affect you and what measures you can take to protect your data.

    Read more …

  • Legal risks in the in-app purchase model

    Legal risks in the in-app purchase model

    Software developers and publishers are offering users the chance to make In-App Purchases within their software, but there are legal risks involved. Learn how to protect yourself and your business by understanding the requirements of distribution platforms and Australian consumer law.

    Read more …

  • Letting go of employees threatening to go to the media

    Letting go of employees threatening to go to the media

    When employees leak confidential information or threaten to go to the media, employers can face serious consequences. Find out what the Fair Work Commission says about this issue and what options employers have to protect themselves.

    Read more …

  • What exactly is an advertising sign-off?

    What exactly is an advertising sign-off?

    Injunctions are Court orders that can restrain almost any conduct. Prohibitory, Mandatory, and Ex Parte injunctions can be sought if serious question to be tried, urgency, damages would not suffice, and the balance of convenience favours the applicant.

    Read more …


Posted

in

, , ,
Send this to a friend