The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has released its seventh report of the Digital Platform Services Inquiry and has invited submission from interested stakeholders by 5 April 2023. The information sought by the ACCC revolves around the activities of digital platform service providers use of strategies like bundling to limit competition and create technological lock-in. Information is also sought about the extent of penetration into the smart home devices, cloud storage sectors by Digital Platforms.
What is a digital platform ecosystem?
The ACCC defines digital platform ecosystem to mean:
“the wide range of interrelated products and services – whether interrelated through technical interoperability or by commercial practices such as bundling – offered by a single or related group of companies.”
What is the significance of digital platform services?
The ACCC acknowledges how some of the top digital service providers in the world such as Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Apple, Meta (Facebook) and Microsoft are expanding the possible services that they may make available. This includes developing products in areas like AI, VR, virtual assistants, education, health, fitness, media streaming, home connected devices, gaming, clouds, and financial technology. The ACCC’s focus for submissions from stakeholders is on smart home devices and cloud storage.
The reason for seeking submission is to explore relationships between interconnected digital service platforms and any potential competition or consumer law issues that may arise.
What is the purpose of the inquiry?
The ACCC is aiming to investigate how expansive digital ecosystems may be potentially harmful to competition, consumerism, and business in general. The issued report acknowledges that whilst platform expansion can encourage competition, these global large providers can inhibit competitors from participating in the market and may limit the opportunity to create a competitive market. The inquiry aims to understand what specific consumer risks there are and their potential impact.
Some issues raised by ACCC include:
- Risk of dark patterns – when user interfaces (UIs) are made to confuse users and make it difficult to express their preferences.
- Certain ecosystems may limit choice for consumers (for example the fact that a consumer owns a Samsung phone limits them from buying an Apple Watch if they wish since the Apple Watch is only compatible with the iPhone).
You can find further information on the Digital Platform Services Inquiry and how to make a submission here: Digital platform services inquiry 2020-25. The ACCC encourages stakeholders to make submissions by 5 April 2023.
Links and further references
Digital platform services inquiry 2020-25
Further information about online business
If your business needs advice on compliance with any aspect of online business, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.
Related insights about online business
-
Parliament passes Government surveillance bill
The Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Bill 2021 added three (3) warrants, allowing law enforcement to access data and take control of online accounts to obtain evidence of serious online crime.
-
Data breach compliance and response plans
Dundas Lawyers create tailored data breach response plans to ensure compliance with the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). Plans include actions, registers, records, tests and tasks. Get an obligation-free and confidential discussion to learn more.
-
Are email trackers admissible as evidence?
The Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) is silent, but the Court considers email trackers and read receipts as evidence in civil and intellectual property litigation. As seen in Jaffari v Grabowski [2013] NSWCA 114, sender’s receipt of confirmation of email relay is a matter for the recipient.
-
Is AI recognized as an inventor under the Patents Act 1990?
The ruling of Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 has opened the door for artificial intelligence-created inventions to be eligible for patent protection. Learn more about the implications of this groundbreaking decision.
-
The Australian Cyber Law Map – overview
The Australian Cyber Law Map provides clarity on ever-changing legal landscape, covering commercial enterprises, cyber offences, infrastructure, international law, national security and personal rights. A source for understanding laws and providing safety/security in the digital age.
-
Explaining Australia’s Media Bargaining Code
The News Media Bargaining Code (NMBC) is quickly moving through Parliament and looks likely to become law. It requires digital platforms, such as Facebook and Google, to negotiate remuneration with News Companies for providing their media services. Non-compliance could result in hefty civil penalties.
-
Kogan fined $310k for Spam Act breaches
Kogan Australia Pty Ltd has been issued a hefty penalty and an enforceable undertaking for not complying with the Spam Act 2003 (Cth). Find out what this means for your business and what the consequences are for failing to comply.
-
Warning – Facebook trolls ordered to pay $150k damages
An online defamation case has resulted in two trolls being ordered to pay a hefty sum in damages. Learn more about the case and the potential consequences of making false claims online.
-
My client poached my software developers – what can I do?
This article examines how professional service businesses can protect their investment in employees from clients poaching them. It looks at potential clauses such as client agreements, non-solicitation of employees, restraints of trade, confidential information, copyright and more.
