The Australian Treasury has today, 4 August 2015, released a consultation paper providing the first details of the impending legislative framework for crowd-sourced equity funding (CSEF) for public companies. The introduction of a legislative framework for CSEF’s is part of the 2015-16 federal budget package.
The consultation paper outlines some of the key provisions that will apply to companies participating in CSEF’s, these include:
- the availability of CSEF is restricted to Australian public companies that qualify as small enterprises who are yet to raise funds through a previous public offer;
- a number of exemptions from certain public company compliance costs for newly registered or converted public companies;
- a maximum of five (5) million dollars in a twelve (12) month period can be raised through CSEF;
- a limit of one class of fully paid ordinary shares per round of CSEF with equal price, terms and conditions; and
- a tailored disclosure package that applies specifically to CSEF.
Further details will be forthcoming in the draft legislation to be released later in the year. Presently the Australian Treasury is inviting comments from interested stakeholders until 31 August 2015. It is anticipated that the legislation will be introduced to Parliament in the Spring sittings.
Further information
If you need advice on your rights and obligations in light of the proposed crowd funding laws, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.
Related insights about corporate law
-
How not to terminate for non-payment
A telecommunications carrier was held liable for almost $1.5M in damages for terminating a contract without scrupulously following the contractual process. In Lime Telecom Pty Ltd v Powertel Limited [No 1] [2008] NSWSC 324, the carrier refused to accept payment.
-
Failure to redeem – default on redeemable preference shares
This article examines the legal issues surrounding Redeemable Preference Shares (REDP’s) and the consequences of a failure to redeem them. The remedies available to aggrieved shareholders are explored.
-
Roll ups in M&A transactions explained
Roll Up and List strategy requires careful consideration of legal and financial structures. Dundas Lawyers discuss different techniques Acquirers can use to ensure success.
-
Share vesting agreements – is compulsory acquisition a penalty?
Drafting a Share Vesting Agreement requires consideration of several factors, including securities, copyright, class of shares, taxation, congruence, Events of Default, issuing all shares, and Events of Default/Forfeiture clauses to avoid penalties.
-
Shareholder disputes – a fight for control
Shareholder Disputes are a common issue for Australian proprietary limited companies. This article outlines the laws, tactics and remedies available to help resolve them.
-
Queensland tech company exits
Brisbane and South East Queensland (SEQ) tech companies have seen major success in recent years, like Wotif.com’s A$703 million sale. For confidential advice on tech sales, contact Dundas Lawyers to learn more about achieving business success and exiting with a profit.
-
Shareholder oppression – Victorian Supreme Court adopts pilot program to resolve oppression disputes
The Victorian Supreme Court has launched a pilot program to help resolve shareholder oppression disputes in a more efficient and cost-effective way. Find out more about the program and its implications for shareholders.
-
Overview of convertible notes
This article examines the features, accounting treatment, benefits, and legal issues of Convertible Notes – a complex financial instrument. It explores how both issuer and holder may benefit, and potential legal issues associated with their use.
-
Misleading and deceptive conduct in commercial dealings
Business dealings between two or more parties often involve statements or representations during negotiations prior to reaching a concluded bargain. This article considers some case examples of conduct found to be misleading and deceptive in a variety of common business and commercial settings
