Corporate law Brisbane

How large must a company be to list on the ASX?

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawCorporate lawHow large must a company be to list on the ASX?

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–4 minutes

Last updated 6 September 2024

For many organisations, achieving an exit for its members via a listing of its securities on the stock exchange may be highly desirable, but for the uninitiated, it can be a complex and somewhat daunting process.  A consultation paper released by the ASX on 12 May 2016 proposes changes to these criteria.  Read our summary of the proposed changes to the eligibility requirements.

Regulatory requirements are imposed by both the Australia Securities Exchange (ASX) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).  The main requirements that need to be considered to determine whether your organisation is suitable to list on the ASX are described below.

How big does a business need to be to list?

Chapter 1 of the ASX Listing rules (Rules) describes the threshold and regulatory tests which must be satisfied (or waived) to be eligible to apply for listing.  To meet the financial thresholds, the organisation must satisfy either the profits test described in Rule 1.2 or the assets test in Rule 1.3 as provided for in Condition 8 of Listing Rule 1.

Profits test

The profits test provides that the following items must be submitted to the ASX:

  • the organisation must be a going concern;
  • the organisation’s main business activity must have been the same for the last three (3) years;
  • three (3) years of audited accounts must be provided to the ASX;
  • the organisation’s aggregate profit from the last three (3) full financial years must have been at least $1 million; and
  • the organisation’s consolidated profit from its continuing operations for the twelve (12) months to a date of no more than two (2) months before the date the entity applied for admission must exceed $A500,000.

To view the complete profits test click here.

Assets test

Provided that the organisation is not an investment entity, the assets test provides that:

  • It must have a market capitalisation of $15Million or net tangible assets of $4Million (after the costs of fundraising); and
  • less than half of the entities assets must be in cash (or in forms readily converted to cash); or
  • half or more of the entities total tangible assets (after fund raising) are in cash, and the entity has commitments to spend half of its cash consistent with its statement of business objectives that it must provide to the ASX; and
  • the entity’s prospectus, product disclosure statement or information memorandum must include a statement that it has enough working capital to carry out its stated objectives; or
  • the entity must have at least $1.5Million in working capital (note there may be exceptions).

In addition condition 1.3.5 of Listing Rule 1.1 must be satisfied by:

  • providing to the ASX with three (3) years of audited accounts – note that there may be other requirements depending on the situation;
  • if the accounts have not been audited, the ASX must be notified; and
  • a proforma balance sheet, together with a review by a Registered Company Auditor, unless the ASX agrees that the proforma balance sheet is not required.

Shareholder spread requirements

Condition 7 of Listing Rule1.1 provides, in the case of a new applicant for a listing, there must be at least 300 holders of securities, each of which holds a parcel of the main class of securities with a value of at least $A2,000.

Listing an organisation’s securities on the ASX can be a complicated yet rewarding process.  Done well, it is a great mechanism for unlocking the value of the members’ equity and enabling the organisation to raise capital through secondary issues.

Further information

If you require advice regarding the listing of your organisations securities on the ASX, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about corporate law

  • Drag-along provisions challenged in Mobile Asset Case

    Drag-along provisions challenged in Mobile Asset Case

    The case of Mobile Asset Holdings Ltd [2026] ATP 7 (Mobile Asset Case) concerned a proposed special resolution to insert drag-along and tag-along rights into the company constitution of Mobile Asset Holdings Ltd ACN 614 791 043 (Mobile Asset).[1]  Ultimately, the Australian Takeovers Panel (Panel) decided that Mobile Asset could not hold a general meeting…

    Read more …

  • What ASIC’s new DIN laws mean for Australian directors

    What ASIC’s new DIN laws mean for Australian directors

    The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has announced that, from 1 July 2027, obligations surrounding director identification numbers (Director IDs) will change.  The amendments to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) which are set to commence will require that companies provide Director IDs to ASIC.  This article will briefly explain the function of…

    Read more …

  • WIJOAV v Goldstone – shareholder oppression in a private equity context

    WIJOAV v Goldstone – shareholder oppression in a private equity context

    The recent case of WIJOAV Services Pty Ltd v Goldstone Private Equity Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 622 (WIJOAV v Goldstone) involved a claim of shareholder oppression under section 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act).  The case established that a shareholder in a private equity fund may be oppressed by a co-investor where…

    Read more …

  • Disputed ESOP – Selak v National Tiles Co Pty Ltd

    Disputed ESOP – Selak v National Tiles Co Pty Ltd

    In the case of Selak v National Tiles, the Vic Supreme Court considered whether a company breached an option agreement governed by the terms of an Employee Share Option Plan (ESOP) by requiring an option holder to execute an undisclosed shareholders’ agreement as a condition of exercising vested options.  

    Read more …

  • Directors’ obligations to comply with Accounting Standards

    Directors’ obligations to comply with Accounting Standards

    Directors are personally liable for ensuring their company operates in accordance with corporate governance and accounting standards.  Obligations contained in part 2M.2 and 2M.3 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) outline obligations for companies to keep financial records and prepare annual financial and director’s reports.  Sections 180 and 344 of the Corporations Act…

    Read more …

  • Are fiduciary duties owed by former company directors?

    Are fiduciary duties owed by former company directors?

    A former director’s duties and responsibilities to their previous company may not end with their resignation. Find out how the Advanced Fuels Technology Pty Ltd v Blythe & Ors [2018] VSC 286 case explored this concept and what the Court had to say.

    Read more …

  • Director Identification Numbers – more red tape?

    Director Identification Numbers – more red tape?

    Treasury Laws Amendment Bill proposes a Director Identification Number (DIN) regime to create transparency, detect illegal phoenix activity, and provide streamlined system for liquidators/administrators. Consultation closes 26 Oct 2018.

    Read more …

  • Director’s personal liability – misleading & deceptive conduct

    Director’s personal liability – misleading & deceptive conduct

    Directors: prevention is cheaper than cure! Explore ways to ensure your corporation doesn’t engage in misleading or deceptive conduct under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). Take active steps to protect yourself from personal liability.

    Read more …

  • Director loans – can they be recalled anytime?

    Director loans – can they be recalled anytime?

    This article explores the legal considerations of when loans between family members or directors of a company are due and payable on demand. Learn more about the relevant case law and express terms that may be implied by conduct.

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend