Corporate law Brisbane

How large must a company be to list on the ASX?

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawCorporate lawHow large must a company be to list on the ASX?

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–4 minutes

Last updated 6 September 2024

For many organisations, achieving an exit for its members via a listing of its securities on the stock exchange may be highly desirable, but for the uninitiated, it can be a complex and somewhat daunting process.  A consultation paper released by the ASX on 12 May 2016 proposes changes to these criteria.  Read our summary of the proposed changes to the eligibility requirements.

Regulatory requirements are imposed by both the Australia Securities Exchange (ASX) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).  The main requirements that need to be considered to determine whether your organisation is suitable to list on the ASX are described below.

How big does a business need to be to list?

Chapter 1 of the ASX Listing rules (Rules) describes the threshold and regulatory tests which must be satisfied (or waived) to be eligible to apply for listing.  To meet the financial thresholds, the organisation must satisfy either the profits test described in Rule 1.2 or the assets test in Rule 1.3 as provided for in Condition 8 of Listing Rule 1.

Profits test

The profits test provides that the following items must be submitted to the ASX:

  • the organisation must be a going concern;
  • the organisation’s main business activity must have been the same for the last three (3) years;
  • three (3) years of audited accounts must be provided to the ASX;
  • the organisation’s aggregate profit from the last three (3) full financial years must have been at least $1 million; and
  • the organisation’s consolidated profit from its continuing operations for the twelve (12) months to a date of no more than two (2) months before the date the entity applied for admission must exceed $A500,000.

To view the complete profits test click here.

Assets test

Provided that the organisation is not an investment entity, the assets test provides that:

  • It must have a market capitalisation of $15Million or net tangible assets of $4Million (after the costs of fundraising); and
  • less than half of the entities assets must be in cash (or in forms readily converted to cash); or
  • half or more of the entities total tangible assets (after fund raising) are in cash, and the entity has commitments to spend half of its cash consistent with its statement of business objectives that it must provide to the ASX; and
  • the entity’s prospectus, product disclosure statement or information memorandum must include a statement that it has enough working capital to carry out its stated objectives; or
  • the entity must have at least $1.5Million in working capital (note there may be exceptions).

In addition condition 1.3.5 of Listing Rule 1.1 must be satisfied by:

  • providing to the ASX with three (3) years of audited accounts – note that there may be other requirements depending on the situation;
  • if the accounts have not been audited, the ASX must be notified; and
  • a proforma balance sheet, together with a review by a Registered Company Auditor, unless the ASX agrees that the proforma balance sheet is not required.

Shareholder spread requirements

Condition 7 of Listing Rule1.1 provides, in the case of a new applicant for a listing, there must be at least 300 holders of securities, each of which holds a parcel of the main class of securities with a value of at least $A2,000.

Listing an organisation’s securities on the ASX can be a complicated yet rewarding process.  Done well, it is a great mechanism for unlocking the value of the members’ equity and enabling the organisation to raise capital through secondary issues.

Further information

If you require advice regarding the listing of your organisations securities on the ASX, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about corporate law

  • ASIC v Macdonald – have the lessons really been forgotten?

    ASIC v Macdonald – have the lessons really been forgotten?

    The case of Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 11) [2009] NSWSC 287 highlights the importance of properly documenting Directors’ meetings to ensure they are legally compliant. This article examines the facts of the case, the basis of The Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s argument, and the principles of preparing minutes of Directors’…

    Read more …

  • The Crowd-sourced Funding Bill 2016 – overview

    The Crowd-sourced Funding Bill 2016 – overview

    Revised from the 2015 Bill, the 2016 Bill provides a regulatory framework for Crowd Sourced Funding (CSF) with eligibility requirements, obligations for Intermediaries facilitating the CSF Offers, and restrictions on advertising to protect retail investors.

    Read more …

  • Shadow directors and de facto directors explained

    Shadow directors and de facto directors explained

    This article examines the legal reality of de facto directors and shadow directors, which go beyond those validly appointed. It also considers whether advisory board members can be classed as such, and the implications of this status, with reference to relevant case law.

    Read more …

  • What are Share Subscription Agreements?

    What are Share Subscription Agreements?

    A share subscription agreement is a binding promise between a potential shareholder and a company. It outlines the number of shares issued, order and timing of funds advanced,along with common clauses such as conditions precedent, confidentiality, no-shop, and more.

    Read more …

  • What exactly is a Preference Share?

    What exactly is a Preference Share?

    Discover the advantages and risks of preference shares and their implications for capital gains tax. This article from Dundas Lawyers explains the hybrid rights associated with preference shares, how they are issued, and their potential benefits for shareholders.

    Read more …

  • What are Shareholders Agreements?

    What are Shareholders Agreements?

    Shareholders agreements are legal contracts that regulate the rights and obligations of shareholders, including confidentiality, dispute resolution, dividend policies, pre-emptive rights, and more.

    Read more …

  • Tag along rights in shareholder agreements

    Tag along rights in shareholder agreements

    Learn how tag along rights protect minority shareholders and ensure that the controlling interest of a company remains in the hands of the original shareholders. Find out more by reading this article.

    Read more …

  • Shareholder disputes – a fight for control

    Shareholder disputes – a fight for control

    Shareholder Disputes are a common issue for Australian proprietary limited companies. This article outlines the laws, tactics and remedies available to help resolve them.

    Read more …

  • Shareholders’ agreements and inconsistency clauses explained

    Shareholders’ agreements and inconsistency clauses explained

    When shareholders are restricted from accessing company information, it may be a sign of a dispute. The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) provides mechanisms for minority shareholders to obtain relevant information, but they must prove they are acting in ‘good faith’ and ‘for a proper purpose’.

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend