shareholder oppression

Tag along rights in shareholders’ agreements

HomeBlogCommercial lawCorporate lawTag along rights in shareholders’ agreements

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

“Tag along rights” are rights that are commonly included in shareholders’ agreements. As the name suggests, tag along rights effectively empower minority shareholders to “tag along” with a majority shareholders’ (Seller) sale of shares to a third party (Third Party). 

In this sense the aim is to protect minority shareholders, who may use them to:

  • take advantage of a favourable deal negotiated between the Seller and a Third Party; and
  • attempt to prevent the controlling interest in the company being transferred to a Third Party.

Tag along rights can be a source of confusion in a shareholders’ agreement depending on how they are drafted.

Because the exact rights vary between individual agreements, tag along rights generally allow minority shareholders to restrict the sale of the Seller’s shares to a Third Party, in circumstances where that Third Party will also purchase a proportionate amount of the minority shareholders’ shares on identical terms.  If the Third Party refuses to purchase the shares of minority shareholders who have exercised their tag along rights (Tagging Shareholders), the Seller can be restrained from selling.

Generally, the trigger for tag along rights will be limited to situations where the Seller is selling an amount of shares that is equal to or greater than a fixed percentage, such as 70%, of the total shares on issue in the Company (Trigger Percentage).

How tag along rights can disadvantage majority shareholders

Tag along rights usually favour the minority they can be a source of frustration for a prospective Seller, especially where the Trigger Percentage is relatively low.

In such circumstances the Seller may struggle to procure a favourable deal for the sale, as any diligent Third Party will negotiate the terms of sale on the assumption that they may be required to purchase the shares of Tagging Shareholders as well.

In other circumstances the exercise of tag along rights by a Tagging Shareholder may result in the collapse of an already negotiated deal. This can have catastrophic results for a Seller who has over-committed to a prospective sale, often leaving them in a position where they must either breach the shareholders’ agreement or back out of the sale.

Links and further references

Legislation

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Further information about shareholders agreements

If you require further information concerning tag along rights or shareholders’ agreements generally, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:

Doyles Recommended TMT Lawyer 2024

Related insights about shareholders agreements

  • What is a Preference Share?

    What is a Preference Share?

    Discover the advantages and risks of preference shares and their implications for capital gains tax. This article from Dundas Lawyers explains the hybrid rights associated with preference shares, how they are issued, and their potential benefits for shareholders.

    Read more …

  • What is a Shareholders Agreement?

    What is a Shareholders Agreement?

    Shareholders agreements are legal contracts that regulate the rights and obligations of shareholders, including confidentiality, dispute resolution, dividend policies, pre-emptive rights, and more.

    Read more …

  • Tag along rights in shareholders’ agreements

    Tag along rights in shareholders’ agreements

    Learn how tag along rights protect minority shareholders and ensure that the controlling interest of a company remains in the hands of the original shareholders. Find out more by reading this article.

    Read more …

  • Shareholder disputes – the fight for control

    Shareholder disputes – the fight for control

    Shareholder Disputes are a common issue for Australian proprietary limited companies. This article outlines the laws, tactics and remedies available to help resolve them.

    Read more …

  • Shareholders’ agreements and inconsistency clauses

    Shareholders’ agreements and inconsistency clauses

    When shareholders are restricted from accessing company information, it may be a sign of a dispute. The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) provides mechanisms for minority shareholders to obtain relevant information, but they must prove they are acting in ‘good faith’ and ‘for a proper purpose’.

    Read more …

  • Top 7 mistakes made in Shareholders’ Agreements

    Top 7 mistakes made in Shareholders’ Agreements

    This article outlines the top 7 mistakes made in Shareholders’ Agreements, covering common pitfalls such as not having an agreement at all, failing to consider a tailored constitution, and overlooking the impact of future events. It provides insights into the importance of having a well-thought-out agreement to protect shareholders and ensure the long-term success of…

    Read more …

  • Tailored Constitutions vs Shareholders’ Agreements

    Tailored Constitutions vs Shareholders’ Agreements

    Discover the differences between a Constitution and a Shareholders’ Agreement and how they can be tailored to a Company’s needs. Find out why it may be beneficial to have both documents in place and explore related articles for further information.

    Read more …

  • What do Shareholders’ Agreements protect against?

    What do Shareholders’ Agreements protect against?

    A Shareholders’ Agreement is a powerful tool for protecting shareholders and creating shareholder value. Learn more about the advantages of having one and what to consider when preparing one in this article.

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend