Corporate law Brisbane

Director resignations – effects from 18 February 2021

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawCorporate lawDirector resignations – effects from 18 February 2021

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

2–4 minutes

Last year, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Combating Illegal Phoenixing) Act 2020 (Phoenixing Act) was enacted to target illegal phoenix activities, where directors create a new company to continue the business of an existing insolvent company to escape paying outstanding debts.  The Phoenixing Act introduces several amendments to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act).  The changes introduced by the Phoenixing Act mainly seeks to prevent directors from improperly backdating resignations or resigning leaving a company without any directors.

Resignation date

From 18 February 2021, the newly commenced section 203AA of the Corporations Act provides that a resignation of a director will now take effect:

  • If, within 28 days after the day the person stopped being a director of the company, ASIC is notified of that fact, the day the person stopped being a director of the company; or
  • In any other case – the day written notice is lodged with ASIC stating that the person has stopped being a director of the company.

Therefore if the director’s resignation is notified to Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) after twenty-eight (28) days of the day the person stopped being a director, the resignation date will be taken to be the date that the written notice is lodged with ASIC.

Under section 203AA(5) of the Corporations Act, It should be noted that a person may apply to ASIC or a Court to fix a different resignation day.  The power to alter a resignation date is discretionary, must be made within a limited timeframe, and any decision is to be determined by a case-to-case basis.

Last director standing

Under section 203AB of the Corporations Act, a director’s resignation will not take effect if the resignation will leave the company with no directors on ASIC records, unless a company is being wound up or other general exceptions such as death of the last director, or where the person did not consent to act as director.

ASIC will now reject the lodgement of Form 484 ‘Change to company details’ or Form 370 ‘Notification by officeholder of resignation or retirement’, where the result would be that the last appointed director ceases their appointment without another director replacing that appointment.

This change is aimed to prevent directors ‘abandoning the ship’ before the company becoming liquidated or otherwise involving in certain wrongdoing.  It will still be applicable regardless of the number of directors resign – therefore if all directors resign on the same day, their resignations will be unsuccessful unless there is one remaining director.

In practice, where internal disputes arise within the company, directors should be mindful of being the ‘last director standing’ and having to be responsible for the former directors’ actions.

With the changes carrying out, it is particularly essential that all directors are fully aware of their obligations and potential liabilities as a director and the timing and circumstances in which they can resign from their position.

Links and further references

Legislation

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Treasury Laws Amendment (Combating Illegal Phoenixing) Act 2020

Further information about the changes to the Corporations Act

If you need advice on how the changes to the Corporations Act may affect you and your company, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about corporate law

  • Is it a debt? – legal test and creditors’ statutory demands

    Is it a debt? – legal test and creditors’ statutory demands

    This article examines a Court decision that could have a significant impact on creditors making statutory demands. Learn more about the case of Matrix Group Co Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 1042, and the implications for creditors, as well as relevant legislation and case law.

    Read more …

  • Director identification numbers now a reality

    Director identification numbers now a reality

    The Federal Government has passed a law requiring all directors to obtain a Director Identification Number (DIN). Learn more about the implications of this law, including the potential penalties for non-compliance.

    Read more …

  • Present entitlement in trusts – what it means

    Present entitlement in trusts – what it means

    Explore the High Court’s interpretation of “present entitlement” under the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth). Learn when a person has a vested interest in trust assets and how the trustee’s discretion affects the beneficiary’s entitlement.

    Read more …

  • What exactly is a franked dividend?

    What exactly is a franked dividend?

    Discover how dividend imputation works and how the amount of tax you owe on dividends can be affected by your marginal tax rate and the company tax rate. Learn about the different types of franked dividends, such as fully franked and partially franked, and how they can impact your finances.

    Read more …

  • Do I have an implied licence for software?

    Do I have an implied licence for software?

    This article examines the implications of a Federal Court case, which awarded over $1.1 million in damages for unlicensed software use. Learn more about the decision and key principles for software licencing that businesses should consider.

    Read more …

  • The Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth) – explained

    The Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth) – explained

    Australian businesses with annual consolidated revenue of AUD$100 million or more must now file a Modern Slavery Statement to the government’s online register, addressing modern slavery risks and due diligence/remediation processes. Lower revenue entities can also file voluntarily.

    Read more …

  • What are exclusive supply contracts?

    What are exclusive supply contracts?

    The Court must consider whether the applicant has no other effective remedy, and if the information is sought for criminal proceedings, that there is a reasonable potential it will lead to conviction.

    Read more …

  • Shareholder oppression – a taxonomy of corporate wrongs

    Shareholder oppression – a taxonomy of corporate wrongs

    This article examines the concept of shareholder oppression and provides examples of when the Court has found oppressive conduct, as well as when it has not. It also outlines the remedies the Court prefers when faced with oppressive conduct.

    Read more …

  • Changes for casual employment – employer’s responsibilites

    Changes for casual employment – employer’s responsibilites

    The Fair Work Amendment Act 2021 (Cth) has changed the landscape of employment for casual employees. Employers need to be aware of the amended definition of casual employees, the “casual conversion” option and the requirement to provide a Casual Employment Information Statement (CEIS).

    Read more …


Posted

in

, ,
Send this to a friend