PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for default judgment pursuant to r 5.23(2)(c) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where second, third and fourth respondents have failed to comply with Court orders and failed to appear – where second, third and fourth respondents have failed to file notice of address for service – where second, third and fourth respondents in default of appearance – applicant entitled to relief in relation to oppression and derivative claims for breaches of fiduciary duties and ss 180-183 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – relief granted
Related cases on shareholder oppression
-
Lawrence v Melbourne Football Club Ltd [2024] FCA 945
CORPORATIONS – where member of Australian Rules football club brought proceeding seeking a declaration pursuant to s 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) that certain conduct of the club was contrary to the interests of its members as a whole, and oppressive to members including himself and other “non-aligned” candidates seeking election to its…
-
Leviston v PQ Management Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] FCA 295
PRACTICE – leave sought pursuant to r 23.03(2)(a) to cross-examine Court expert – expert valued shares in a company which was the subject of oppression proceedings – proposed cross-examination to address valuation methodology – no point of principle Related cases on Shareholder oppression
-
Haycraft v AF1 Services Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 774
CORPORATIONS – application for winding up of a company on just and equitable grounds under s 461(1)(k) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – where directors of the company disagree on aspects of the conduct of the business – where relevant business is profitable, solvent and has many employees – applicable principles to just and…
